The_Pauser wrote:Huh?? We needed points earlier than with 3 minutes left in the game if we wanted to win. I'm sorry, but for 57 minutes of a football game, putting up a mere 15 points against the worst defense in the league is downright pathetic.David wrote: Couldn't put up the points when needed? Huh?? He drove the Leos down the field and put 10 points on the board in the final couple of minutes.
I'll grant you, I am not a fan of our scheme. Way too pedestrian. Far too conservative. Thank God for all the outlet passes to Roberson. But Lulay executed well within the system. If you're arguing - like I think you are - that Printers would have done a better job last night than Lulay, who can tell? But my own feeling is that with Printers's turnover issues lately, Lulay was the better choice (based on last night's performance), even if Printers was on the bench.
Also, hard to put a lot of points on the board when Edmonton controlled the clock. Time of possession was tilted far in the Eskimos' favour, especially in the 3rd quarter.
DH
I'm not a fan of our scheme either, but that's the same scheme Casey Printers had to play with. Except when we had Printers in he often didn't have the luxury of those outlet passes to Robertson on most downs.
I'm not saying Printers would have done a better job. There's no point in arguing that because we'll never have the answer. What I'm arguing is that Lulay did NOT put in the best QB performance by a Lion this season, last night. Lulay did NOT prove that he's a better choice than Printers either. All Lulay did prove is that he continues to struggle to put up points over a long period of time, and that Casey Printers was not the reason our team has been losing games either. Yes Lulay put up points in the final 3 minutes of the game when he went into a hurry up offense and basically called his own plays, but Casey played very very well in the hurry up as well.
I'll give you that Printers seemed to have a short stint of turnover problems, but you do realize that Lulay has turned the ball over more than Printers this season, in less playing time as well, do you?
Sorry to butt in, but I do have to challenge you on the highlighted comment, Pauser. If I remember correctly...actually I have evidence on my PVR...where Casey DID have the luxury of one of those outlet passes to Robertson on that last play of the game in WINN but didn't commit to it. Robertson AND Black were his 1st and 2nd reads, so I was informed, and they were WIDE OPEN but for some reason Casey overlooked them and threw the ball towards the side line to Wilson for that unfortunate INT. (Apparently, according to my resources, Casey did this a lot where he would overlook his 1st and 2nd reads and just throw it to whoever he thought was open.)
Hey, I'm just sayin...I gotta go with David on this one as far as agreeing with him that Lulay executed well within the system and managed the game as well as he could have with the time he had to work with in the second half of the game. It's hard to put up points on a consistent basis when the other team was eating up the time clock with their running game and our defense was having a difficult time stopping them. Oh, ya, and I still think the brutal calls and missed calls by the refs contributed to our loss. (The unnecessary roughness call on Banks, the PI on Phillips and the dead ball call on Black. I could go on but what's the point?) This game is over and at the end of the day the overall performance of the team was just not good enough to win. We just have to look forward to Friday's game against Calgary and hope for the best. Hopefully the players will show up in full force and pull out a win this time.













