Mike Bell

The Place for BC Lion Discussion. A forum for Lions fans to talk and chat about our team.
Discussion, News, Information and Speculation regarding the BC Lions and the CFL.
Prowl, Growl and Roar!

Moderator: Team Captains

Post Reply
Lions33
Starter
Posts: 109
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 10:40 am

Mike Bell

What are the chances of getting Mike Bell?
nelson95
Legend
Posts: 1533
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 3:28 am
Location: Overpriced Valley

Re: Mike Bell

why?

can he catch?
Give the ball to LeeRoy!
User avatar
Tighthead
Legend
Posts: 2173
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2006 8:24 pm

Re: Mike Bell

We can only use one import RB, and we have two, so why get Bell?
User avatar
Rammer
Team Captain
Posts: 22328
Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2002 6:04 pm
Location: Coquitlam, B.C.

Re: Mike Bell

Tighthead wrote:We can only use one import RB, and we have two, so why get Bell?
If you are getting rid of Smith, you need a competent backup that is getting minimum CFL salary. If either Terrence Whitehead or Mike Bell provide the insurance that Wally is obviously looking for, don't expect to see Smith around much longer, IMO.
Entertainment value = an all time low
TheLionKing
Hall of Famer
Posts: 25536
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 10:13 pm
Location: Vancouver

Re: Mike Bell

Tighthead wrote:We can only use one import RB, and we have two, so why get Bell?
Depth
User avatar
Toppy Vann
Hall of Famer
Posts: 10347
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 12:56 pm

Re: Mike Bell

Rammer wrote:
Tighthead wrote:We can only use one import RB, and we have two, so why get Bell?
If you are getting rid of Smith, you need a competent backup that is getting minimum CFL salary. If either Terrence Whitehead or Mike Bell provide the insurance that Wally is obviously looking for, don't expect to see Smith around much longer, IMO.
Hey, it's not like learning the Lions running plays is very hard. They are using too few plays to be concerned about a new guy fitting in fast.
User avatar
Rammer
Team Captain
Posts: 22328
Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2002 6:04 pm
Location: Coquitlam, B.C.

Re: Mike Bell

Toppy Vann wrote:
Rammer wrote:
Tighthead wrote:We can only use one import RB, and we have two, so why get Bell?
If you are getting rid of Smith, you need a competent backup that is getting minimum CFL salary. If either Terrence Whitehead or Mike Bell provide the insurance that Wally is obviously looking for, don't expect to see Smith around much longer, IMO.
Hey, it's not like learning the Lions running plays is very hard. They are using too few plays to be concerned about a new guy fitting in fast.
:lol: True that, however I think it is more if he has talent. Being able to shift/block/catch and most importantly hold onto the ball.
Entertainment value = an all time low
User avatar
Wakesbetterthanyou
Legend
Posts: 1788
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2008 6:08 pm

Re: Mike Bell

Toppy Vann wrote:
Rammer wrote:
Tighthead wrote:We can only use one import RB, and we have two, so why get Bell?
If you are getting rid of Smith, you need a competent backup that is getting minimum CFL salary. If either Terrence Whitehead or Mike Bell provide the insurance that Wally is obviously looking for, don't expect to see Smith around much longer, IMO.
Hey, it's not like learning the Lions running plays is very hard. They are using too few plays to be concerned about a new guy fitting in fast.

Yea, thats one of the main probs with the leos o. Too vanilla, teams kno what they are gonna do before they do it most of the time....tho i doubt we'll see bell now that whitehead has been signed.
Check out my lions art http://lionbackers.com/bc_lions/viewtop ... =4&t=15940

How does a rider fan spell dynasty????

O N E
TheLionKing
Hall of Famer
Posts: 25536
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 10:13 pm
Location: Vancouver

Re: Mike Bell

Toppy Vann wrote:
Rammer wrote:
Tighthead wrote:We can only use one import RB, and we have two, so why get Bell?
If you are getting rid of Smith, you need a competent backup that is getting minimum CFL salary. If either Terrence Whitehead or Mike Bell provide the insurance that Wally is obviously looking for, don't expect to see Smith around much longer, IMO.
Hey, it's not like learning the Lions running plays is very hard. They are using too few plays to be concerned about a new guy fitting in fast.
Precisely ! How difficult is it to learn off left tackle, off right tackle and diddle, diddle, straight up the middle ?
User avatar
Ravi
Legend
Posts: 1051
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 9:01 pm
Location: St Catharines, Ontario

Re: Mike Bell

Who is Mike Bell? Seriously.
TheLionKing
Hall of Famer
Posts: 25536
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 10:13 pm
Location: Vancouver

Re: Mike Bell

He is recent NFL cut and is on the Lions negotiation list.
No Ka Oi
Starter
Posts: 219
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 1:00 pm
Location: Crescent Beach

Re: Mike Bell

If Bell was any good, why was he released before the preseason? Most of the best NFL prospects are kept until the final cutdown day. Did Whitehead even make an NFL training camp this year? We already have the CFL's top rusher on our roster, like 1600 yds and 18 td's last year. Plus Joe hardly ever fumbles, is a good pass blocker, isn't prone to mental mistakes, never complains (except maybe about his dead bean plants.) , etc, etc. I guess we can only hope S. Logan can stay healthy for another 13 games.

Bell or Whitehead will likely be a step down in every category compared to Joe, other than they will probably sign for the league minimum. This reminds me of the Lions futile search for a competant receiver, then they let Thelwell go for nothing. If this is a salary cap issue, why did the Lions sign Joe to lucrative long-term deal this season?
Blitz
Team Captain
Posts: 9208
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 8:44 am

Re: Mike Bell

No Ka Oi wrote:If Bell was any good, why was he released before the preseason? Most of the best NFL prospects are kept until the final cutdown day. Did Whitehead even make an NFL training camp this year? We already have the CFL's top rusher on our roster, like 1600 yds and 18 td's last year. Plus Joe hardly ever fumbles, is a good pass blocker, isn't prone to mental mistakes, never complains (except maybe about his dead bean plants.) , etc, etc. I guess we can only hope S. Logan can stay healthy for another 13 games.

Bell or Whitehead will likely be a step down in every category compared to Joe, other than they will probably sign for the league minimum. This reminds me of the Lions futile search for a competant receiver, then they let Thelwell go for nothing. If this is a salary cap issue, why did the Lions sign Joe to lucrative long-term deal this season?
Our Leos signed Joe Smith to a lucrative contract because he ran for so many yards last season, led the league in touchdowns scored, and our running attack was the key reason our offence scored the most touchdowns and the most points in the league last year.

However, our Leos also did not anticipate they would find a tailback with the talent of Logan or that our running attack, so powerful last season, would struggle this season...a combination of our running scheme being vanilla and CFL defenses onto it and also because our offensive line blocking has not been as effective (heck...we've struggled to get less than half a yard on a quarterback sneak)

Joe is around right now due for his depth, because Logan has struggled from his days of college with a nagging high ankle sprain, and because we didn't have an adequate backup if Logan got hurt. Our Leos will audition players throughout the season at tailback. If we find one who can fill the bill (all will be cheaper) Smith will be let go. If not, we'll keep looking until that person arrives. Whitehead may or may not be the answer.

Bell was let go early in training camp because he showed up out of shape!
"When I went to Catholic high school in Philadelphia, we just had one coach for football and basketball. He took all of us who turned out and had us run through a forest. The ones who ran into the trees were on the football team". (George Raveling)
User avatar
pennw
Legend
Posts: 1921
Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2007 7:50 am
Location: Chilliwack

Re: Mike Bell

Blitz wrote:[ (heck...we've struggled to get less than half a yard on a quarterback sneak)
We've struggled on almost every QB sneak , with less then a yard to go , but we do give them up pretty easy though , don't we ?
Post Reply