David wrote: Tue Jul 09, 2024 10:36 am
Interestingly, Milanovich mentioned on the TSN post-game presser that Hamilton only lined up 11 players on Special Teams a couple of times! The fact that we couldn't exploit that for big returns disappoints me. And that brings me to my question. Should we look to replace Terry Williams as returner?
He's like a punter who averages 42.5 yards a punt, when punters now are flirting with a 50 yard average. That said, he is good at directional punting and doesn't launch many singles. Likewise, Williams is a reliable returner, doesn't drop the ball, and heads upfield in a hurry. The problem is, it's often 9 yards and splat when the rest of the league has "field flippers" in Alford, Dedmon, Leake, and Grant.
My issue with Rick (why waste a challenge flag when you can finish a game with one in your pocket?) Campbell, is his conservatism. Fulgham aside, which was glaringly obvious, he seems reluctant to make roster changes to a winning roster when it's only a matter of time before our weaknesses get exposed by a well-coached squad (my old 10th grade English teacher would call this 'foreshadowing,' lol).
DH
On Dolegala or Brice, it strikes this observer that the Lions are planning an entire season where starter is never nicked and the back ups get no in-game experience whether short yardage or the odd package. I can't forget the Bombers losing Kevin Glenn in 2007 and the seldom used Ryan Dinwiddie having to play the entire Grey Cup game and not able to win it.
There's an argument that too many in season roster moves create instability in the team and that usually turns up negatively in the play unless it's s a glaring issue that has to be fixed.
Stanback is a great addition to the Lions and is proving that with his running ability and out of the backfield catches and play. I'm still not convinced that the Lions run calls show enough creativity that Stanback can get as many yards through the LOS as out of the backfield. I see the same situation for James Butler in Hamiton as Milanovich's play calling doesn't suit a RB getting massive yards through the line other than when LBs screw up or blocking is there.
On challenging, I watched so many games and sports this past week, I can't recall specific instances whereI questioned the Lion HC for not challenging but I know there was one for sure this last game. I don't know but is there any upside with the Command Centre when you only challenge the ones you really are certain of and not get seen as using the flag on spec just because it's at the end of the game?
I think I heard Rod Smith mention that at least once that he thought there were only 11 on Ham STs. That sure doesn't speak well to the disruption of firing your ST coach mid-season given all their problems in all aspects of their game. TWICE is in WTF territory!!! LOL
I strongly believe that BC's kick returner is doing in games EXACTLY what the coaches want and it's EXACTLY what he does in every practice.
I suspect that it's a risk averse philosophy grounded in the reality that too often blockers end up bringing the return back to the infraction point when the kick returner heads off in a different direction. I'm inferring from that they think if a return is on where he can take to the house it's after he's gone deeper in the the first waves of downfield tacklers.
He does give the Lions decent field position.
I have watched a number of Lion practices and one thing that stands out is that Williams never fumbles the ball but heads right up into the blocking.