WestCoastJoe wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2019 12:15 am
David wrote: Sun Jul 21, 2019 9:37 pm
WestCoastJoe wrote: Sun Jul 21, 2019 3:42 pm
I think Figueroa, Steward, Chungh, and possibly Roy are plenty good enough to play. I think that is obvious. Right tackle? Boyko has had his issues, as a new player to the CFL. Foucault just might not be talented enough. Footwork. Hand skills, etc. Time to go with an INT? Maybe. All the shuffling? Not good. Anyone knows that. Is Bryan Chiu a good enough OL coach? I expect so.
LT - Figueroa
LG - Steward
C - Roy (until Godber returns)
RG - Chungh
RT - Knevel
If management / coaches would quit tinkering and settle on these five with Foucault and Norman as back-up guard and tackle respectively (and Boyko going on an injured list until he learns the Canadian game) this could turn out to be a very decent offensive line. At least one that will give Reilly more than one steamboat before a defender(s) is in his face.
DH
It seems we have some ratio flexibility room. It might be Norman's turn at right tackle. But more importantly, game plan to get help vs the pass rush. All the things noted above. Prepared and ready. Dominant rush end? Use a good variety of double teams. Run the ball at him, over and over, when it can be worked in, with some deception. We ... do ... not ... do ... that. Make sure that Hughes get drilled, especially with angle blocks, on every play. Put him on his backside a large number of times, legally of course.
I agree that our offensive line would look best with a configuration of Figuroa, Steward, Roy (Godber) Chungh, and Kneval (Kneval has looked good whenever he has played). A second option, as also mentioned, would be to start an International at right tackle.
The reality is that we have enough talent to go with an All-National offensive line. That offensive line would look like this:
Steward- left tackle, Godber - left guard, Roy - center, Chungh- right guard, Kneval - right tackle (backups would be Boyko, Foucault, Pierson)
The issue of our offensive line is not playing enough Internationals. Its who we are playing. We have started Foucault for two seasons now with dismal results and Boyko has really struggled in his 5 starts.
Constantly changing our starting five has also been a major issue, especially when we have also been asking offensive linemen to switch positions as well as switching from one side of the line to the other, with all that entails in terms of differnt stance, footwork, punch hand, etc.
That is a big deal. For example, switching one's stance is no easy thing. In pass blocking, changing one's initial drop foot is no easy matter. For example, check to see which foot you lead first to begin walking and then change it to the opposite foot each time you begin to walk. Fun eh?
There are so many problems with our Leos team that its difficult to begin. There are obviously talent issues on defense, at defensive line, linebacker, and defensive backfield. Hervey depleted the defense for 2019. I don't know what he was thinking - perhaps that we would win every game 44-42 because he put most of our SMS on offence.
However, dispite having lots of talent on offence, it has not translated into scoring points. Yes, Reilly has had three 300 yds. plus passing games. But Lulay and Jennings had some good games last season too.
What is more indicative, is that our offensive production this season is eerily similar to last season. Last season we averaged 20.9 points per game and this season we are averaging 21.7 pts per game (helped by that late touchdown drive againat the Riders). In terms of yards per game, last season we averaged 329 yd. per contest and this season we are averaging 330 yds. per contest.
So far, Mike Reilly and all those fancy new, expensive additions on offence have given us an average increase of one yard per game and less than one point more per game.
But one should not expect more. When Reilly played under McAdoo and Jackson in Edmonton, his quarterback efficiency was in the 80's. This season, so far, its sitll in the 80's. Last season, both Lulay and Jennings quarterback efficiency was in the 80's. (By the way, Trevor Harris, Jeremiah Masoli, Matt Nichols, and even Nick Arbuckle and Vernon Adams Jr. have quarterback efficiencies in the 100s.
Matt Nichols presently has a quarterback efficiency of 129.1 compared to Mike Reilly's quarterback efficiency of 89.1. But Nichols, an average quarterback in terms of talent plays in Paul LaPolice's offensive scheme, designed around his players while in B.C. Reilly plays in Jacksons' plug and play RPO scheme.
Some fans think that the RPO offence is a new scheme. Nope, its not. Its still a Spread Offence, with post-snap reads. Jackson has taken the worst of two schemes - the RPO and Buono's Simplified Spread and married them into his new offence.
On first down, we usually go quick hitter RPO, usually with a five receiver set. On second down, we go often go Simplified Spread, with long developing pass patterns, always throwing from the pocket with a five pack set of receivers.
We rarely go two back pro offence of tight end with a four receiver package.
Here is just one example of why Jarious doesn't get it (and no, it is not chipping or using a tight end when the offensive tackle is getting his butt spit out by Charleson Hughes but its another good example of why he doesn't get it).
Jackson likes to use quick hitch screens as a counter to opposing teams stacking the box. However, Jackson most often uses Burnham or Durant, two very unshifty receivers who are not good runners.
Who would be our best receiver to use for a hitch screen.? Shaq Johnson. Second best - Duron Carter. But you can bet that Jackson will keep using Burnham for hitch screens even though it would make more sense to use Burnham, Durant, and Cottoy as htich screen blockers.
Secondly, Jackson continues to develop pass pattern plays that push the football towards Burnham and Durant, to use Carter as a possession receiver, and to use Shaq Johnson and Cottoy as decoys.
Here is our success rate in terms of throwing to our receivers:
Bryan Burnham 28/45 - 62%
Duron Carter 31/48 - 64.5%
Lamar Durant 27/37 - 72.9%
Shaq Johnson 14/20 - 70.0%
Jevon Cottoy 12/13 - 92.3%
Those stats indicate that we would likely be better off by targeting Burnham and Carter less and looking to Cottoy, Johnson, and Durant more often.
Defenses are focused on Burnham and Durant, while knowing we are basically using Carter for short routes as a possesion receiver.
But pointing this kinda stuff out will make no difference. Jarious Jackson can only see what he can see and its a narrow view from his rigid set of binoculars.
Its kinda like, if he changed anything, it would be admitting that what he was doing before needed improvement.
Easier to blame it on things like a quarterback not being smart enough or offensive line play or Duron Carter or the quarterback not getting the football snapped in time (or someone stealing his playbook

)
When someone like Jacison thinks they have the answer, no amount of information or stats or anything is going to get them to change. The ego is in charge and it does not allow for adaptation because it is 'superior'.
"When I went to Catholic high school in Philadelphia, we just had one coach for football and basketball. He took all of us who turned out and had us run through a forest. The ones who ran into the trees were on the football team". (George Raveling)