WestCoastJoe wrote:Re the 40 ...
I agree that it can be taken out of context. And that it can make a guy look better or worse than he is as a player.
It's a bit like having a guy with a rocket arm (Ryan Leaf) who is missing many of the other attributes that a QB needs.
On the other hand, I do believe it is useful for teams to know the relative speed of the athletes. In that context I believe the 40 certainly makes more sense than the 100. It is also useful to know how strong and fit the athletes are, etc.
The measurement process is loaded with problems. Even the interview process can be misleading.
The bottom line is: Can the guy play? Size, speed, even intelligence in some cases, can be over-rated.
Is it a crapshoot? Not necessarily. Over time the best judges of talent come out ahead on their rosters. Look at the Alouettes under Popp, the Lions under Buono, the Steelers in the NFL, etc.
Arceneaux, IMO, has good enough speed flat out, and especially reacting to the ball, and running with the ball after the catch, to be very effective as a player, in the CFL, or the NFL, if he gets that chance.
Well, a couple of differences 1 yd rule, the wider field means Wr's sort of round off their routes instead of crisply breaking them off.
That said, I think Stephen Black is going to be really special this season.