I believe that the option year deal is still there because it is part of the current collective bargaining agreement with the players. Once that expires (after the 2009 season IIRC), then the league can scrap it, especially if there continues to be no new deal with the NFL.JohnHenry wrote:Yes, signing S. Logan, with his 7.3 yd rushing average (shades of Willie Fleming 8) ) is a definate priority. But after what D. Sproles (5'6", 180 lbs) did in the Chargers wildcard game last weekend with over 300 yds of offence, you might think other NFL clubs might be hunting for a diminutive scatback like Logan?
But the CFL has got to get rid of this Option year deal. S. Logan has played one season and now he's eligible to try the NFL? And Kelly Campbell, too? The CFL gets nothing for letting these players sign in the NFL while still under CFL contract. Initially the NFL loaned us $3M to let them do this. We paid the money back, so why is this Option year tryout still there?
...and I thought that W. Buono didn't sign players to one-year contracts?
Before the option year tryouts, it was the clubs option if the player was on the team, not the players. If the NFL gave us $50k to sign option players, I guess we could become their feeder league, if that's what we want. Otherwise the CFL should scrap this option clause and sign all players for two years minimum. The league mandates two-year contracts to help develop some consistency in their rosters...now they should enforce their own rules.
S. Logan, K. Campbell and a dozen other hopefuls will still be signing in the CFL if they scrapped the NFL option year tryouts.
Having said all of that, keep in mind that the CFL has lost fewer and fewer players over the years as most CFL players realize that unless they get a sizable signing bonus from an NFL team, they will likely be only training camp fodder in the NFL and will forfeit a valuable half-season of CFL salary if they do leave for the NFL. Many more CFL players get workouts than actually sign with an NFL team.