Chris Schultz's Comments, and his rebuttle on TSN.CA

The Place for BC Lion Discussion. A forum for Lions fans to talk and chat about our team.
Discussion, News, Information and Speculation regarding the BC Lions and the CFL.
Prowl, Growl and Roar!

Moderator: Team Captains

User avatar
LION82
Rookie
Posts: 90
Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2002 7:29 pm
Contact:

...in process still...
Failing to prepare yourself is preparing yourself to fail.
User avatar
smphantom
Legend
Posts: 1821
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2005 3:13 pm
Location: God's Country - North Vancouver

LION82 wrote:...in process still...
That is unbelievable that it's taking that long, Jason. Good luck with it. :thup:
Stay thirsty my friends.
Solar Max
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6820
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 8:15 pm

LION82 wrote:...in process still...
After a YEAR??

Need to get the CFLPA rep on this; I presume you have.
Bobbyp
Champion
Posts: 609
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 9:57 pm
Location: Under priced Kelowna

I wonder what he would call tripping in hockey? I have a suggestion
Trying to chop someones leg off with a piece of lumber.
Some mispelling may or may not occur as well as using a word incorrectly in my posts
READER CAUTION IS STRICTLY ADVISED
Solar Max
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6820
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 8:15 pm

Schultz's job is to create controversy, so he's creating it. He doesn't necessarily believe it any more than we do.
User avatar
PigSkin_53
Hall of Famer
Posts: 3942
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 11:47 am

Rammer wrote:
Shi Zi Mi wrote:IIRC, Chris Schultz never played for the Bombers at any time......I believe he was an Argo for his entire CFL career.
That is what IR as well, former Cowboy turned Argo.

At any rate, lets put this in some perspective, the league hasn't fined him for the supposed "leg whip", yet felt compelled to on Jason Clermont in 06. That in itself is a good indicator as to the severity of "dirty play".

Does anyone recall if JC won his appeal of the fine he received last season?


Right Rammer Murph's alleged leg whip was nearly identical to that of LION82's and as unintentional, but because Rob's under the microscope there are a lot of defenders getting away with entrapment and embellishment and on many outcomes cheat shots after the whistle.

IIRC Shultzy played offensive tackle and got into a dust up with Nick Hebler in Toronto in '85 regular season where the two of them where both ejected from the game for dirty play.

He's no angel and has no right to call the kettle black.
"Just Win Baby" ~ Al Davis
Blitz
Team Captain
Posts: 9208
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 8:44 am

IIRC, Chris Schultz never played for the Bombers at any time......I believe he was an Argo for his entire CFL career.
_________________
Well...he wore blue and that's enough for me!! :wink:
Which could explain just about everything when it comes to him.
_________________
Toron...ta....you say!! Well, it is the center of the universe...at least they think so!! :thdn:
"When I went to Catholic high school in Philadelphia, we just had one coach for football and basketball. He took all of us who turned out and had us run through a forest. The ones who ran into the trees were on the football team". (George Raveling)
User avatar
tedbear
All Star
Posts: 274
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 9:24 am

joesports wrote:In his rationalization, Schultz says he's just commenting on Murphy's call for a leg whip. The call was tripping, not a leg whip. I still don't think it was a leg whip, and didn't look that different than anything else that happens each play on the field.

It just seemed Schultz's comments at half-time were a bit opportunistic. Other penalties were called during the game. Some calls were missed (spearing, anyone?). Too bad Schultz singled out one penalty and one player to berate.

I generally don't have much issue with what he says one way or another, and he's right, he's played in those situations, so his opinion has to be considered. I just don't agree with it in this case. :wink:
IMO it was a Trip. Schultz saw it as a leg whip and he has more experience than me so I will take his word for it. Was Murphy trying to cause injury? I dont think so. I agree Schultz was using Murph's reputation to stand on a soap box and increase ratings at Murphys expense. How about Heberts Roughing the passer penalty? If he was roughing the passer you could use the same argument that he was trying to injure Jackson. Why didnt Schultz call him out. Double standard the way I see it.
User avatar
Dan_Payne_fan!!
Hall of Famer
Posts: 3568
Joined: Wed Oct 02, 2002 4:57 pm
Location: Port Moody

LION82 wrote:...in process still...
Seriously??? :shock: :?
2012 Season Ticket Holder
User avatar
WestCoastJoe
Hall of Famer
Posts: 17745
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 8:55 pm

joesports wrote:
Here's one I'd loved to see consistently called: :wink:
Article 4 – Roughing The Passer

(f) Contacting the passer if either the initial source of contact, or
primary source of contact, is the defender’s helmet
.
copy that

:whs:

Make them go back to leather helmets. That would stop leading with the head, and making first contact with the helmet. Probably wouldn't stop it, but the damage might be less. NIKE would be the first in the market with the new helmets. Swooosh.
User avatar
Rammer
Team Captain
Posts: 22328
Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2002 6:04 pm
Location: Coquitlam, B.C.

WestCoastJoe wrote:
joesports wrote:
Here's one I'd loved to see consistently called: :wink:
Article 4 – Roughing The Passer

(f) Contacting the passer if either the initial source of contact, or
primary source of contact, is the defender’s helmet
.
copy that

:whs:

Make them go back to leather helmets. That would stop leading with the head, and making first contact with the helmet. Probably wouldn't stop it, but the damage might be less. NIKE would be the first in the market with the new helmets. Swooosh.
They should make the helmet collapse if the crown is impacted first, it is apparently the only way for the Black to understand where the initial impact occurs.
Entertainment value = an all time low
Post Reply