Eskimos are 'predictable': Pless

The Place for BC Lion Discussion. A forum for Lions fans to talk and chat about our team.
Discussion, News, Information and Speculation regarding the BC Lions and the CFL.
Prowl, Growl and Roar!

Moderator: Team Captains

Post Reply
User avatar
B.C.FAN
Team Captain
Posts: 12591
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 10:28 pm

It's interesting to see some of the same criticisms of the Lions being made of the league's other 1-6 team, not just from fans but from former all-star linebacker and Sportsnet commentator Willie Pless. The scheme vs. execution debate is a popular theme.
Eskimos are 'predictable': Pless
By TERRY JONES, QMI Agency

Willie Pless, the great ex-Eskimo linebacker, has a quick-hit commentary gig with Sportsnet this year and, in the most recent episode, he hit hard.

Pless suggested the No. 1 thing the Eskimos had to deal with during their bye week break was obvious.

"For sure I'd change up the offensive schemes and the defensive schemes. They are so predictable. Heck, my nine-year-old kid can predict, 'Please don't throw it to the flat.'

"And sure enough, they throw it to the flat. Guys who watch a lot of film to break it down can tell exactly what's going to happen. In the Eskimos case, they're throwing it right into their game plan."

So, with the 1-6 Eskimos back to work preparing for Saturday's visit by the 5-2 Saskatchewan Roughriders, the No. 1 question is this:

Did they do it? Did they fix it?

The problem with trying to determine the answer is that if the Eskimos are going to come out with different schemes, altered philosophies, major adjustments or minor tweaks, they aren't likely to announce it to the Roughriders.

And there was a lot of double talk around the subject after Eskimos practice Tuesday which made you wonder if they did a lot or did nothing at all.

It's the kind of thing a coaching staff should do on a regular basis. It's called self scouting.

The reason offensive line coach Mike Bleamer was fired in mid-season was the belief that it was the schemes which were the problem more than the personnel beyond the departed Joe McGrath.

So it stands to reason to expect to see change there.

Quarterback Ricky Ray, who took starting quarterback reps yesterday although it looked like he was working on a pitch count, was careful on the subjects of schemes and philosophies and the changes Willie Pless, his nine-year-old son and pretty much everybody in the press box have found predictable.

"The coaches got some time to assess things and maybe make tings a little more refined," he said of tinkering and tweaking.

"The offensive line is going to be different because they have a different coach.

"But it's more than schemes," he said.

"When it comes to things like our problems on second and long and in the score zone, we can't have any mistakes. We can't have dropped balls and missed reads," he said, not mentioning missed blocks which get him sacked and penalties and the long list of other factors which cost coaches jobs.

"Coaches don't drop passes or throw interceptions," he said. "Coaches don't jump off-side."

Head coach Richie Hall suggested work was done.

"Some things we have reassessed and re-evaluated fundamentally and technically," he said.

But in looking at something like the second-down conversion rate (second worst in league at 35.8%) or touchdown percentage from the red zone of 20 yards and in (second worse in league at 61%), Hall said the breakdown reveals mostly a lot of breakdowns.

"It's never one thing all the time."

As defensive co-ordinator as well as head coach, did he use the bye week to figure out how to stop the run?

Allowing a ridiculous 163.7 yards per game rushing is, other than the Eskimos record in the first and fourth quarters, one of the ugliest stats of the season.

That's a lot of tweaking.

There's also the league's worst giveaway/takeaway stat (minus 14 to Winnipeg's minus seven and B.C.'s

minus two, with all others in plus territory) and the league high per-game penalty total of 102.9 yards per game.

That's not go-back-to-the-drawing-board stuff, that's grab-a-stick-and-go-out-behind-the-woodshed stuff.

Hall said there were some signs of a new atmosphere and attitude with players at practice.

"I think the break came at a good time. They came back and seemed like they missed each other."

Can't wait to find out if Willie Pless's nine-year-old kid thinks they used their break well.
Link

The Eskimos' problems run a lot deeper than the Lions' problems. They have had issues with offence, defence, coaching, discipline and work ethic. It's interesting to see Richie Hall claiming he's seen a new atmosphere and attitude from the players. That hasn't been a problem in B.C.

Even though the Esks seem to have made more changes off the field, I still like the Lions' chances against Calgary this week better than the Esks' chances against Saskatchewan.
User avatar
Toppy Vann
Hall of Famer
Posts: 9794
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 12:56 pm

Dont kid yourself. While there is stability in the coaching ranks as Wally and the Lions are not as dumb as Rick L.. the President of the Eskimos.. they are still in deep, deep trouble.
"Ability without character will lose." - Marv Levy
sixbeamers
Rookie
Posts: 36
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 7:50 pm
Location: vancouver

Would the lionbackers blogger known as "The Lion King" please contact Mike Beamish of The Vancouver Sun. Mike can be reached at: sixbeamers@aim.com. Or, e-mail Mike at: mbeamish@vancouversun.com
Hope to hear from you.
User avatar
WestCoastJoe
Hall of Famer
Posts: 17721
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 8:55 pm

Willie Pless ... "For sure I'd change up the offensive schemes and the defensive schemes. They are so predictable. Heck, my nine-year-old kid can predict, 'Please don't throw it to the flat.'

"And sure enough, they throw it to the flat. Guys who watch a lot of film to break it down can tell exactly what's going to happen. In the Eskimos case, they're throwing it right into their game plan."
Any time a team is losing a lot of games, the coaches should look closely at what they do. They need to change the culture.

I see 4 areas that can be changed in football.

1 Personnel ... Change QBs. That's the big one. If it don't work, then I think you have to look deeper than just personnel or execution. Tinker with the lineup here and there. But this is mostly change for the sake of change, to appear to be doing something as management.

2 Execution ... Wally's favorite answer for any and all ills. Play better. Work harder. Be smarter. There is some truth to it. But even the top teams can execute better. And if a team is not executing well across the board, I would look at the coaching staff as having much responsibility for the culture of failure.

3 Coaching ... It always comes back to the coaching. A team or organization's values filter down from the top. There is no escaping this. The best coaches find ways to win. Usually they adapt. If they don't adapt, if they stay with the same stuff year after year, time eventually passes them by.

4 Scheme ... That dreaded word. That loaded word. It's the play book. It's the game planning. It's the play design. It's the play calling. It's the sequencing during games. It's the ability to keep the opponent off balance, to deceive them, to disguise your own intentions.

(In a few cases, very few, dominant teams can dictate the game, run anything they want, not bother to disguise anything, and ram the ball down your throat. Hello Lombardi's Green Bay Sweep. Hello Jimmy Brown running the ball with the Cleveland Browns.)

But then there is another school of football philosophy, represented by innovators like Bill Walsh, and even Bill Belichick. Sports Illustrated had a wonderful article on Walsh way back in 1982, written by Kenny Moore, titled: "To Baffle and Amaze." You still need to execute. But the idea is that "scheme" matters one helluva lot too.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/ ... /index.htm
The problem with trying to determine the answer is that if the Eskimos are going to come out with different schemes, altered philosophies, major adjustments or minor tweaks, they aren't likely to announce it to the Roughriders.

And there was a lot of double talk around the subject after Eskimos practice Tuesday which made you wonder if they did a lot or did nothing at all.

It's the kind of thing a coaching staff should do on a regular basis. It's called self scouting.
Self scouting. Good idea. Or get a consultant to scout your team.
The reason offensive line coach Mike Bleamer was fired in mid-season was the belief that it was the schemes which were the problem more than the personnel beyond the departed Joe McGrath.

So it stands to reason to expect to see change there.
More than personnel. And by personnel, read execution.
Quarterback Ricky Ray, who took starting quarterback reps yesterday although it looked like he was working on a pitch count, was careful on the subjects of schemes and philosophies and the changes Willie Pless, his nine-year-old son and pretty much everybody in the press box have found predictable.

"The coaches got some time to assess things and maybe make things a little more refined," he said of tinkering and tweaking.

"The offensive line is going to be different because they have a different coach.

"But it's more than schemes," he said.
It's always more than schemes. But schemes are important too. And deception and disguise are important too.
"When it comes to things like our problems on second and long and in the score zone, we can't have any mistakes. We can't have dropped balls and missed reads," he said, not mentioning missed blocks which get him sacked and penalties and the long list of other factors which cost coaches jobs.

"Coaches don't drop passes or throw interceptions," he said. "Coaches don't jump off-side."
True, but coaches are responsible for selecting and training the players. And the coaches are responsible for putting the players in position to succeed.

If our QBs do not have time to make their reads beyond one desperate look for their first read, then our coaches have put them in position to fail. And then Wally blames the QBs for failing, even though the QBs have less than 2 seconds to go through their reads.

How long does it take an unblocked defender to reach the QB from perhaps 5 yards away? Less than 2 seconds. Try making more than one read in that time before the avalanche hits.
sixbeamers
Rookie
Posts: 36
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 7:50 pm
Location: vancouver

Would the lionsbacker blogger named "The Lion King" please contact Mike Beamish of The Vancouver Sun at: sixbeamers@aim.com. Alternatively, Mike can be reached at: mbeamish@vancouversun.com.
Hope to hear from you.
User avatar
David
Team Captain
Posts: 9370
Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2002 10:23 am
Location: Vancouver (Kitsilano)

There seems to be more internal problems in Edmonton.

During the bye week an Eskimo player suggested off-the-record to someone in the Edmonton media that Mo Lloyd is a cancer in the locker room. Naturally, this did not go down too well with the man in question.

article here

DH
Roar, You Lions, Roar
hutch
Champion
Posts: 709
Joined: Wed Oct 02, 2002 3:32 pm
Location: Fort McMurray
Contact:

sixbeamers wrote:Would the lionsbacker blogger named "The Lion King" please contact Mike Beamish of The Vancouver Sun at: sixbeamers@aim.com. Alternatively, Mike can be reached at: mbeamish@vancouversun.com.
Hope to hear from you.
Could always just send him a PM...
User avatar
B.C.FAN
Team Captain
Posts: 12591
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 10:28 pm

Coach Richie Hall weighs in on Willie Pless's criticism. Like Wally Buono, he says success depends on execution.
Most offences are predictable:Hall

Edmonton coach Richie Hall responded to statements by former Eskimo Willie Pless that the club's offence is too predictable by saying all offences are pretty predictable.

Success depends on execution.

"It doesn't matter what you do, if you don't execute it doesn't matter. You know certain people are going to get the football, they're going to run the ball and if they execute it then is that a predictable offence?

"If we execute then people wouldn't be saying the things they are. If you block the guys you're supposed to block, if you catch the balls you're supposed to catch, make your reads and throw the ball where you're supposed to, then the predictability is, we have to out-execute them. The thing is other teams are making plays and we're not."
Link
TheLionKing
Hall of Famer
Posts: 25103
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 10:13 pm
Location: Vancouver

Buono and Hall have something in common. Both teams are 1-6 and both blame execution for their records.
User avatar
WestCoastJoe
Hall of Famer
Posts: 17721
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 8:55 pm

B.C.FAN wrote:Coach Richie Hall weighs in on Willie Pless's criticism. Like Wally Buono, he says success depends on execution.
Most offences are predictable:Hall

Edmonton coach Richie Hall responded to statements by former Eskimo Willie Pless that the club's offence is too predictable by saying all offences are pretty predictable.

Success depends on execution.

"It doesn't matter what you do, if you don't execute it doesn't matter. You know certain people are going to get the football, they're going to run the ball and if they execute it then is that a predictable offence?

"If we execute then people wouldn't be saying the things they are. If you block the guys you're supposed to block, if you catch the balls you're supposed to catch, make your reads and throw the ball where you're supposed to, then the predictability is, we have to out-execute them. The thing is other teams are making plays and we're not."
Link
Great. Wally is being supported, enabled and empowered by Richie Hall. As a human interest story, I am happy they have each other for that support and encouragement. Otherwise it could get depressing down there with 1 and 6 records.

Wally and Richie both say all offences are predictable, and that execution is the key. If all offences are predictable I have to wonder why we blitz at the wrong time, why we send the wrong guy in at the wrong time (usually Crawford), why we can't wait on the receivers and meet them just before the ball arrives. I would suggest that Regina, Calgary and Montreal are not that predictable, plus they have that wonderful thing, execution.

There is not a coach in the world of football who does not believe that execution is important. But there are also coaches who believe deception and disguise are important, and who know how to achieve it to a certain extent. You will find them at the top of the standings, and as winners of the last 3 Grey Cups. But we don't have them coaching our offence, or as Head Coach and GM.
Post Reply