But the web page said that the upper bowl will be open if there is enough demand.Lionheart wrote:Anyways, the game will be lower bowl only for this exibition.

Moderator: Team Captains
On a Wednesday? A full month before the CFL season ends? With therefore no risk of a clash with a potential Lions home playoff game?Robbie wrote:The date has been set: Wednesday, October 3, 2007 at 7:00 PM at BC Place.
http://www.whitecapsfc.com/news/?id=5059
It ain't got ya yet Robert, only confused you. The '83 Soccer Bowl was between Tampa Bay Rowdies and I'm thinking maybe Tulsa. I was at that Soccer Bowl. It's a long time ago and but it seemed to me there were enough empty seats to think that a 58000+ attendance figure was somewhat fudged. It was fairly full but I don't recall there being under 2000 empty seats. Then again it was a long time ago so the old remembery might be a bit foggy so I digress.Lionheart wrote:Bingo, what a memory. Alcohol aint got me yet. 8)Toppy Vann wrote: Highest Attendances for Soccer In Canada (League) (50,000+)
60,342 - Vancouver Whitecaps vs Seattle Sounders June 20, 1983 (BC Place).
Ok, so the date is wrong
Actually, the '83 Soccer Bowl, played on October 1, 1983, was between the Tulsa Roughnecks and Toronto Blizzard. 58,452 were in attendance at BC Place to see Tulsa win 2-0.Hambone wrote:The '83 Soccer Bowl was between Tampa Bay Rowdies and I'm thinking maybe Tulsa. I was at that Soccer Bowl. It's a long time ago and but it seemed to me there were enough empty seats to think that a 58000+ attendance figure was somewhat fudged.
There ya go. I got half of it right which I suppose is appropriate since that's about how much of the game I paid attention to. It left such an indelible mark in my brain I didn't even remember that a Canadian team was involved.Robbie wrote:Actually, the '83 Soccer Bowl, played on October 1, 1983, was between the Tulsa Roughnecks and Toronto Blizzard. 58,452 were in attendance at BC Place to see Tulsa win 2-0.Hambone wrote:The '83 Soccer Bowl was between Tampa Bay Rowdies and I'm thinking maybe Tulsa. I was at that Soccer Bowl. It's a long time ago and but it seemed to me there were enough empty seats to think that a 58000+ attendance figure was somewhat fudged.
To be fair, the WHA did continue teams within the NHL. But I agree with you the price tag involved for Beckham is a recipe for disaster, in fact it is the only route that is possible.Lionut wrote:It's an excellent idea to bring David Beckham over. After all, signing aging, washed up European stars worked so well for the NASL!It's funny to see this happening, because for those of us who remember the first incarnation of the NASL in the late 70s this is like watching disco make a comeback.
The initial buzz that was generated when Beckham signed has faded already, and he hasn't even played his first game. Sure, he'll draw a big crowd for the first game he plays in various cities, including Vancouver, but how about the second and third time? When Pele, whom I gather was a better player than Beckham ever dreamed of being, made his rounds in North America, he drew huge crowds initially, but that didn't stop the NASL from eventually closing up shop. This movie has been run so many times before -- the WHA signing Bobby Hull, the WFL signing Larry Czonka, the USFL signing Doug Flutie -- and every time it collapses like a bad souffle. Enjoy the game, soccer fans, but don't go thinking that Beckham is going to be the catalyst for an explosion of interest in pro soccer in North America. One guy simply can't do that.
When Pele went to the Cosmos in 1975 he was 35 pushing 36 and had been lured out of retirement. Having already been retired for 2 years his signing was more like that of Gordie Howe for the WHA than it was comparable to Bobby Hull's inking. Pele's NASL stay was brief and lasted only 3 years. He would retire again after the 1977 season. By the time the Village of Vancouver knocked the Cosmos off in the 1979 NASL Championship he was 2 full years removed from the league and was gone for 7 years before it folded.Lionut wrote:It's an excellent idea to bring David Beckham over. After all, signing aging, washed up European stars worked so well for the NASL!It's funny to see this happening, because for those of us who remember the first incarnation of the NASL in the late 70s this is like watching disco make a comeback.
The initial buzz that was generated when Beckham signed has faded already, and he hasn't even played his first game. Sure, he'll draw a big crowd for the first game he plays in various cities, including Vancouver, but how about the second and third time? When Pele, whom I gather was a better player than Beckham ever dreamed of being, made his rounds in North America, he drew huge crowds initially, but that didn't stop the NASL from eventually closing up shop. This movie has been run so many times before -- the WHA signing Bobby Hull, the WFL signing Larry Czonka, the USFL signing Doug Flutie -- and every time it collapses like a bad souffle. Enjoy the game, soccer fans, but don't go thinking that Beckham is going to be the catalyst for an explosion of interest in pro soccer in North America. One guy simply can't do that.
I was also at that game, but I can't remember if the place was almost full, so I'm not sure if 58K+ was the number of tickets sold or actual turnstile attendance. I do remember there was a decent crowd however.Hambone wrote:Robbie wrote:Actually, the '83 Soccer Bowl, played on October 1, 1983, was between the Tulsa Roughnecks and Toronto Blizzard. 58,452 were in attendance at BC Place to see Tulsa win 2-0.Hambone wrote:The '83 Soccer Bowl was between Tampa Bay Rowdies and I'm thinking maybe Tulsa. I was at that Soccer Bowl. It's a long time ago and but it seemed to me there were enough empty seats to think that a 58000+ attendance figure was somewhat fudged.