Big topic.
Autonomy ...
Toppy, you and I might see things somewhat differently here.
Part of the discussion is the level of the importance of the Head Coach to a team's success. Some of us think it is number one. Wally said as much in his press conference, along with the quarterback. If that is true, then one of the next questions, especially for the Lions, is the level of autonomy of the Head Coach, under GM Wally Buono.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap200000 ... d-coaching
Exhibit A: the Kansas City Chiefs. [September, 2013]
Last year, the Chiefs had the worst season in their history; in fact, considering the Jovan Belcher tragedy, it was perhaps the worst season in any team's history.
Kansas City failed to hold a single lead in regulation during any of its first eight games en route to a 2-14 finish. The home-field advantage of Arrowhead Stadium -- which, for much of the 1990s and 2000s, was considered one of the loudest, toughest venues for visitors to play in -- was reduced to a joke. All opponents had to do was force one three-and-out and the boos would start. Fans had grown impatient, given so many instances of football incompetence.
What a difference a year makes. Now, as we head into Week 4 of the 2013 NFL season, the Chiefs are one of seven undefeated teams in the league. New coach Andy Reid, brought over after 14 years with the Philadelphia Eagles, hasn't just changed the offense; he's changed the culture.
Throughout training camp, Chiefs players marveled over Reid's remarkable attention to detail, his focus on teaching the small nuances of the game. Ceding many of the personnel duties he'd held in Philadelphia to new Chiefs general manager John Dorsey, Reid was free to do what he does best: coach football players. And the experience and authority he brought to the situation was decisive.
Players must know they are accountable to the head coach; the importance of that can't be overstated. Of course, the owner obviously is the ultimate authority on any team, because the money being spent is his. And in the age of the salary cap, the NFL is more of a general manager's league than ever before. Still, both owner and GM must give the head coach autonomy regarding game-day decisions and allow him to be vested in the larger personnel process; otherwise, the coach loses any chance of truly leading the team.
Huge turnaround from one year to the next, with the arrival of Andy Reid.
Reid changed the culture.
He has great attention to detail, in a productive manner, not destroying the athletic instincts of the players.
"his focus on teaching the small nuances of the game"
"Players must know they are accountable to the head coach" ... Wally said players still came to him. He said they had confidence in him. Then he would send them to Benevides. I think the players should know they cannot go to Wally. Go to Mike, first, for anything.
Wally on the rooftop. Gotta stop. Wally on the tower. Gotta stop. Each practice. It seems to me this has to stop. That is Head Coach territory, it seems to me.
Still, both owner and GM must give the head coach autonomy regarding game-day decisions and allow him to be vested in the larger personnel process; otherwise, the coach loses any chance of truly leading the team.
IMO Wally should only discuss game day personnel if asked. Roster decisions should not come down to who wins the argument, as Wally suggested in his comments previously. Yes, ratio considerations, but not debate about who starts by evaluation of talent or preparedness. Input if asked, Yes, but not with all players, all positions, et cetera.
Systems? Gotta be the Head Coach, IMO. Playbook? Head Coach. Game preparation? Head Coach. Practice plans? Head Coach. Input sure, but not all the time, not each situation. Just IMO ... Otherwise, Wally is still the Head Coach in actual fact, without the title, and his Head Coach is nearly a puppet.
In recent years, former Chiefs GM Scott Pioli -- in true New England Patriots style -- was the ultimate authority, and he made sure everyone knew it. As a result, former coaches Todd Haley and Romeo Crennel appeared emasculated in the eyes of their players. That obviously is not the case in Kansas City now.
Did we not hear suggestions from players that they could tell certain decisions came from Wally and others came from Benny? Dysfunctional in my view.
It is just my opinion, but it seems to me Wally's influence has been too heavy. So one says but Benevides needed it. Then I would say that Benny is the wrong guy there.
(Do we know that Mark Washington ran the kind of defence that is close to his heart, close to his beliefs? Not sure. Do we know that Khari Jones ran the kind of offence he believes in? Khari pretty much said from the get go that he would use JC's system, with some tweaks. Did we see any tweaks? Khari was probably under qualified for that job. Or his hands were tied. Dunno ... And of course he was saddled with the same O Line regime we have had since 2003.) -- Wondering here if the systems and philosophy truly reflected the beliefs of Mike Benevides and his coordinators, or those of Wally Buono? Or are those guys so much under the spell of Wally Buono that they only see things his way?
Bottom line for me in this "autonomy" discussion is this: I think we might have had too many cooks in the kitchen with Wally's shadow looming over Benny, with Wally taking far too great a role in preparation of the football team for games.
Is Wally having trouble letting go?
If this is true, we might cut ourselves off from independent-minded, fully qualified, self-respecting prospective Head Coaches, as mentioned by one the reporters recently.
Just IMO. But I think autonomy of the Head Coach has been an issue for our team, and might be going forward.