Re: Video: Bombers Zone Blocking vs Unprepared Lions Defence
Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:34 pm
Whose philosophy runs the defence of the Lions?
Hypothetical ... let's imagine that the Defensive coordinator says to his conservative Head Coach:
DC: "I'd like to put 8 men at the LOS when Bishop goes behind centre. We could still drop 3 or even 4 of them back into coverage. Also, we could blitz from there. The O Line would not know who to block or how to set up their combo chip blocks at the point of attack."
HC: "No, we cannot gamble like that. Instead we'll put 4 men on the line, in position and have them hold their gaps."
DC: "How about some run blitzes with the LBs?"
HC: "No, we can't afford to vacate the middle of the field."
DC: "How about if we mix things up a bit by having our 4 D Linemen slant hard into the gaps on some plays?"
HC: ''If we did that they would be out of position." [Best to keep them in position I suppose. Makes it easier for the Bombers to find them for their zone blocks]
.................................
This is not on the players. This is putting a very simple, predictable scheme out there against a formidable zone blocking scheme. Same lineup. Same positions. Same assignments, play after play.
So instead of attacking or even threatening the LOS with 5, 6, 7, or even 8 men (which would put loads of pressure on the O Line), our tackles, Hunt and Williams face double-teams the entire game, and we do not hold the gaps anyway, because our tackles are sealed by excellent offensive zone blocking. Meantime the O Line can calmly go about their business knowing exactly where the D Linemen are and what assignments they are carrying out.
http://s239.photobucket.com/albums/ff17 ... Lionsc.flv
Hypothetical ... let's imagine that the Defensive coordinator says to his conservative Head Coach:
DC: "I'd like to put 8 men at the LOS when Bishop goes behind centre. We could still drop 3 or even 4 of them back into coverage. Also, we could blitz from there. The O Line would not know who to block or how to set up their combo chip blocks at the point of attack."
HC: "No, we cannot gamble like that. Instead we'll put 4 men on the line, in position and have them hold their gaps."
DC: "How about some run blitzes with the LBs?"
HC: "No, we can't afford to vacate the middle of the field."
DC: "How about if we mix things up a bit by having our 4 D Linemen slant hard into the gaps on some plays?"
HC: ''If we did that they would be out of position." [Best to keep them in position I suppose. Makes it easier for the Bombers to find them for their zone blocks]
.................................
This is not on the players. This is putting a very simple, predictable scheme out there against a formidable zone blocking scheme. Same lineup. Same positions. Same assignments, play after play.
So instead of attacking or even threatening the LOS with 5, 6, 7, or even 8 men (which would put loads of pressure on the O Line), our tackles, Hunt and Williams face double-teams the entire game, and we do not hold the gaps anyway, because our tackles are sealed by excellent offensive zone blocking. Meantime the O Line can calmly go about their business knowing exactly where the D Linemen are and what assignments they are carrying out.
http://s239.photobucket.com/albums/ff17 ... Lionsc.flv