David wrote:sj-roc wrote:Something else I mentioned but hasn't been picked up is the nature of the annual scheduling cycle at BCP. With MLS getting their schedule set (and perhaps even started play) before the CFL, does this mean that as long as the two teams share the building, that the Lions will always be in a position of having to pick from the leftover scraps after the Whitecaps have skimmed off the dates they want? Do the Lions have any leverage at all in the process?
This is a great question, sj-roc and one that should be asked of Skulsky at the next "Presidents Week" summit on TSN (assuming we are even invited without an agreement in place with TSN1040, which in itself is a little disconcerting, but I digress...). It would appear that the Whitecaps have determined that Saturday (afternoons) are their favourite day for home matches. But why should we be left with table scraps just because their season starts earlier?
DH
I would think at a minimum that the Lions have priority for SF & F playoff games in November but MLS soccer season is over by then anyway. The other thing is, there are so many internal constraints that the CFL itself (and TSN) places on its own schedule that it might not be a straightforward matter for the Lions to tell BCP in Dec or Jan, "Hey, block off these eighteen nights because we
might want to use some of them." I would think there ought to be some clear language in the Lions' lease with BCP on how their schedule is prioritised and balanced with that of the Whitecaps.
The logistics of setting the league schedule are (or have become) sufficiently complex that the league has consulted with University of Saskatchewan business professor (and self-disclosed Roughrider fan/STH) Keith Willoughby on getting it assembled. He even published this research paper in 2010 (link below) on how he went about building the schedule for that year. This was in the eight-team era, so the process has become even more complicated now with Ott back in the loop to make it nine. It's a somewhat dry read in places but it identifies pretty much all of the scheduling issues that get discussed on boards like this and the takeaway is that it's not a simple task.
"A Decision Support System for Scheduling the Canadian Football League"
A couple of passages:
Formulating a model to develop the CFL schedule is somewhat different from the modeling efforts devoted to determining schedules for other sports. Whereas applications for such sports as hockey and European or South American football attempt to minimize total distance travelled, our approach does not consider these factors because CFL teams return to their home cities after a road game. Moreover, baseball and hockey teams have the flexibility to play multiple games spread out on any day of the week. In the CFL, each team plays at most one weekly game on any day between Thursday and Monday.
...
... (C)ommercial software providers have... developed scheduling applications that are being successfully implemented in both professional and amateur sports organizations. Examples of such companies include the Bortz Media and Sports Group, Optimal Planning Solutions, and the Sports Scheduling Group. Apparently, the CFL had been approached in previous years by different organizations interested in applying computer-based procedures to developing the league’s regular-season schedules. The league’s reluctance to enter into agreements with such parties may have been driven by the costly nature (in the CFL’s estimation) of these services. Our involvement with the league occurred in an unexpected fashion. Both authors are sports fans; one, a season ticket holder with a CFL team, had written a letter to league officials requesting clarification of the schedule creation process and indicating that an analytical approach could prove advantageous. When we indicated our willingness to develop an OR model simply “for the love of the game,” we sparked the interest of league management.
Incidentally, KW is also the same person who created the league's standings simulator that's been discussed on this board before: it calculates during the course of a season based on current standings the probability for each team finishing in what place in their division. Here's a Global news story from last October, with a 4-min video (still plays as of this writing, I just checked) of him being interviewed about this simulator:
http://globalnews.ca/news/1592564/cfl-s ... s-ti-cats/
Excerpt:
SASKATOON – A computer program being used on the CFL’s website is not giving the Saskatchewan Roughriders much of a chance to win the West Division even though the man who designed it, Keith Willoughby, is a long time Riders fan.
Willoughby is the associate dean of research and academics at the Edwards School of Business at the University of Saskatchewan.
He’s designed a computer model that the CFL is hosting on its website.
For the Riders, the model currently gives them a 2.94 per cent chance of winning the West. For Willoughby, it’s a painful conclusion.
“It hurts me, being a passionate member of Rider Nation, and a season ticket holder,” Willoughby told Global Saskatoon’s Morning News.
Sports can be a peculiar thing. When partaking in fiction, like a book or movie, we adopt a "Willing Suspension of Disbelief" for enjoyment's sake. There's a similar force at work in sports: "Willing Suspension of Rationality". If you doubt this, listen to any conversation between rival team fans. You even see it among fans of the same team. Fans argue over who's the better QB or goalie, and selectively cite stats that support their views while ignoring those that don't.