


Moderator: Team Captains
More spirit to the game IMHO, can't have enough of it when there are 55+K in the Dome.No Ordinary Joe wrote:No. This is Vancouver. This is BC Place. It's our house and we invite the guests and the 'Rider mascot and cheerleaders are NOT welcome.
Yeah, except they got our wins-loss-tie totals wrong. 13-5?!?!? And it was written yesterday, after the semi-final.Robbie wrote:An article in today's Regina Leader-Post about how Gainer is welcome to BC Place.
http://www.canada.com/reginaleaderpost/ ... 9340fac685
No, that article was NOT written yesterday. It was written LAST YEAR after the 2006 West Division Semi-Final.Stui wrote:Yeah, except they got our wins-loss-tie totals wrong. 13-5?!?!? And it was written yesterday, after the semi-final.Robbie wrote:An article in today's Regina Leader-Post about how Gainer is welcome to BC Place.
http://www.canada.com/reginaleaderpost/ ... 9340fac685
I mean, correct me if I'm wrong, but weren't we 14-3-1? Baaahahahaha!! I guess 13 isn't as far away from their season record as 14 is.
Heheh.. Brings up a mental image of Gainer, laid on his back, with Leo standing with one foot on Gainer's chest, Leo pounding his own chest, and growling stright up into the air. Of course, we'd have to use that canned noise we're famous for, so that everyone would get to hear Leo roar.Dan Russell wrote:Gotta like the Gopher in. Bad karma otherwise. Plus Gainer will have no impact on the loud Lions crowd.
Ahhh, right. Sorry, was just reading the issue date. Didn't notice the disclamer before the article. Just went straight into the article.Robbie wrote:No, that article was NOT written yesterday. It was written LAST YEAR after the 2006 West Division Semi-Final.Stui wrote:Yeah, except they got our wins-loss-tie totals wrong. 13-5?!?!? And it was written yesterday, after the semi-final.Robbie wrote:An article in today's Regina Leader-Post about how Gainer is welcome to BC Place.
http://www.canada.com/reginaleaderpost/ ... 9340fac685
I mean, correct me if I'm wrong, but weren't we 14-3-1? Baaahahahaha!! I guess 13 isn't as far away from their season record as 14 is.
Frankly, I'm surprised that that old RL-P article is still available for free viewing  and from a year-old link, no less.Stui wrote:Ahhh, right. Sorry, was just reading the issue date. Didn't notice the disclamer before the article. Just went straight into the article.Robbie wrote:No, that article was NOT written yesterday. It was written LAST YEAR after the 2006 West Division Semi-Final.Stui wrote: Yeah, except they got our wins-loss-tie totals wrong. 13-5?!?!? And it was written yesterday, after the semi-final.
I mean, correct me if I'm wrong, but weren't we 14-3-1? Baaahahahaha!! I guess 13 isn't as far away from their season record as 14 is.