Speculation is over. No season in 2020.

The Place for BC Lion Discussion. A forum for Lions fans to talk and chat about our team.
Discussion, News, Information and Speculation regarding the BC Lions and the CFL.
Prowl, Growl and Roar!

Moderator: Team Captains

Post Reply
Murdoch
All Star
Posts: 294
Joined: Fri Jan 17, 2020 2:04 pm

David wrote:
Fri Oct 02, 2020 7:47 pm
As a complete side note, does anyone else besides me think that it is bloody strange that virtually every other sports stadium/arena in North America has naming rights but not BC Place? It's a crown corp yes, but it's not exactly making money hand over fist from what I hear. They can use all the revenue they can get. Would say, $10M for a 10-year naming rights deal not help the bottom line?


DH :cool:
BC Place is actually a pretty good name compared to some that are popping up around the continent. Chamber of Commerce should fork over some dough to Pavco to keep it that way but that gets confusing as well with the different public corporations and such.

Agree with others now is a purrfect time to transition on from Mr Braley and civic leaders need to decide if they like the economic impact of the Lions. They may only rent the building a dozen times a year but one of the first thing mentioned about BC Place in my eperience is that the Lions play there. Not sure how many days of the year the building is generating revenue but losing a major tenant only makes it harder to justify the expense of the management group.

Winnipeg Enterprises was the Pavco equivalent before IGF and basically got squeezed out of the plan as the tax payer watch dog with all the big dreams during construction. Wade Miller just took over Winnipeg Enterprises food and beverage duties among others and the Bombers have never looked back.

The private owner route is not an easy row and the Lions have been fortunate to have had stable ownership. Toronto has a list of owners the length of ones arm in the last 25 years although Bob Young in Hamilton appears to be some kind of saint so who knows.
User avatar
Sir Purrcival
Hall of Famer
Posts: 4621
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Comox Valley

Yeah, it might be hard to find someone with deep pockets and a love of the game. There are a few millionaires around but the Lions are a tougher and tougher sell it seems.

Was not Telus set to have naming rights at BC Place a few years back? I remember some issue that happened there and the deal was squashed. Personally I get real tired of the product name stadiums. Rexall this, Staples that, What's next Viagra Village? or maybe B Cialis Place? The slogan? It's hard not to watch....
Tell me how long must a fan be strong? Ans. Always.
User avatar
David
Team Captain
Posts: 9364
Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2002 10:23 am
Location: Vancouver (Kitsilano)

Sir Purrcival wrote:
Tue Oct 06, 2020 2:08 pm
Personally I get real tired of the product name stadiums. Rexall this, Staples that, What's next Viagra Village? or maybe B Cialis Place? The slogan? It's hard not to watch....
How long before it would be nicknamed the PupTent? :wink:


DH :cool:
Roar, You Lions, Roar
User avatar
Sir Purrcival
Hall of Famer
Posts: 4621
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Comox Valley

😅
Tell me how long must a fan be strong? Ans. Always.
Murdoch
All Star
Posts: 294
Joined: Fri Jan 17, 2020 2:04 pm

Sir Purrcival wrote:
Tue Oct 06, 2020 2:08 pm
The slogan? It's hard not to watch....
Something hard to talk about.
User avatar
BC 1988
Legend
Posts: 1357
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2013 1:58 pm
Location: BC (since 1988)

Dave Naylor on what he thinks is currently happening (or not happening) in league offices.
https://www.tsn.ca/radio/vancouver-1040 ... -1.1541721
Murdoch
All Star
Posts: 294
Joined: Fri Jan 17, 2020 2:04 pm

Good 3DN interview with Mike Benevides. No question his heart is in the right place. I think Ottawa is quite a bit better with Bene and Lapo and Nick Arbuckle.

Interesting number is 2019 revenue of $210 M for the league. CFO is not doing the job having to chase grants to continue on. The more we learn the worse it gets.

Player salaries accounting for just under 30% compared to 50% for most other professional leagues is disappointing. Also hard to squeeze the fans any more than they already do. Leaves one group.
User avatar
B.C.FAN
Team Captain
Posts: 12580
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 10:28 pm

Murdoch wrote:
Tue Nov 03, 2020 3:04 pm
Player salaries accounting for just under 30% compared to 50% for most other professional leagues is disappointing. Also hard to squeeze the fans any more than they already do.
This is the league’s best opportunity to overhaul its business model. Teams have more non-players than players on their payrolls. If they can centralize some business operations and staffing as other companies and sports leagues have done, they can reduce their overhead and free up money to improve their bottom line and perhaps give a bigger share of revenue to players.
User avatar
Gridiron Ernie
Champion
Posts: 685
Joined: Sat May 14, 2016 4:36 pm
Location: within earshot of the ghosts of Empire Field

Yet another ramification in the wake of no CFL season -- Reilly filed grievance vs. the Lions (back in September -- and is ongoing). https://3downnation.com/2020/11/09/fran ... eed-money/
User avatar
Sir Purrcival
Hall of Famer
Posts: 4621
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Comox Valley

It's going to be tough to work this one out. While I can see where he is coming from, I can also see where the Lions are on the issue. Hopefully both sides can arbitrate the dispute reasonably and without too much in the way of bad feelings. I wonder with Braley's passing, who would be making the purse string decisions? The Lions are part of an Estate now I suppose and those things can be notoriously rigid when it comes to the use of estate funds. Also, at his age and with every team in similar financial straights, Reilly doesn't necessarily have the leverage that he might normally have. He can't withdraw his services, all teams right now are hemorrhaging badly and I would suspect very reluctant to take on his contract without knowing what the future holds. If the CFL were to be on hold another season, that is another year of aging for Reilly. So I don't know where the right lies in all of this but the employer finds itself in an extraordinarily bad place financially at the moment suffering a double whammy of both Covid and not having a clear ownership picture or even an intact management structure. It's kind of a purrfect storm.
Tell me how long must a fan be strong? Ans. Always.
User avatar
B.C.FAN
Team Captain
Posts: 12580
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 10:28 pm

According to Farhan Lalji, the $250,000 guaranteed portion of Mike Reilly's contract wasn't filed with the league, and neither Rick LeLacheur nor David Braley were aware of it.

User avatar
Sir Purrcival
Hall of Famer
Posts: 4621
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Comox Valley

A piece of Ed Hervey work? The guy who has done a mysterious disappearing act.

So if this part of the contract was not filed with the league and ownership which presumably has to pass a blessing on all of the money spent were unaware of this, then is it enforceable? I can only think that perhaps this sum might have counted against the Cap, maybe put the Lions over the cap? Maybe there are more mystery deals that we know nothing about. Might explain why Hervey made such an abrupt departure. Perhaps there is more manure in the barn covering up inconvenient truths that there may be be more disclosures to come.

Post Post Edit
So after listening to TSN and hearing about it, I'm not unhappy that Hervey is gone. If the facts stand as they are laid out, then it seems like a very unfair situation for all the parties involved. The league didn't know about, the owner didn't know about it, the player is dealing with the GM and takes on faith that they have done the proper things required (not unreasonable imo) Then it turns out that the GM hasn't done the job properly. What it tells me is that there is no proper mechanism from the league to acknowledge to all parties that a contract has been registered and accepted by the league. If there is, then I would definitely lay a big portion at the feet of the player's agent. He represents his client in contract negotiations and should be ensuring for the sake of his client that the contracts agreed to are all signed, certified and recognized as legal. However, the Lions have an obligation too. Ethical or not, Hervey was the legitimate GM for the club when this clause was negotiated. He was in charge of signing players and managing the day to day operations of the club. The club is responsible for him at some level at least morally if not legally.
Last edited by Sir Purrcival on Tue Nov 10, 2020 12:39 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Tell me how long must a fan be strong? Ans. Always.
User avatar
BC 1988
Legend
Posts: 1357
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2013 1:58 pm
Location: BC (since 1988)

https://www.tsn.ca/radio/vancouver-1040 ... -1.1550198
Farhan expands on the Reilly grievance and his opinion that Hervey's departure was due to this.

https://www.tsn.ca/radio/vancouver-1040 ... -1.1549850
Yesterday, Dave Naylor remarked about how little information there was about the issue.
User avatar
David
Team Captain
Posts: 9364
Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2002 10:23 am
Location: Vancouver (Kitsilano)

The dots are starting to be connected. A plausible scenario goes like this. Mike is deciding whether to stay in Edmonton where he's happy or move across the Rockies to play closer to home. Tough choice but something enticing usually has to be offered to make someone leave a good situation.

Yes, the $725K was a factor. But a shrewd agent could say, "that's not enough to get Mike to move." Then Ed says, "what's it going to take to get Mike here?" The agent says "you need to come up a bit." Ed says, "I can't do that. This is already a generous offer, he'll be the highest paid player in the league." The agent goes, "not according to what the Argos are prepared to pay BLM." So Ed goes, "I tell you what. I can't pay more money. This is the highest we'll go. But how about we give Mike guaranteed money? Just between us."

Maybe not word-for-word, but something along these lines seems about right. The departure for personal reasons didn't quite pass the smell test. My sense was, why would he not just to take an undetermined "leave of absence?" There's not a lot going on around the league right now.

DH :cool:
Roar, You Lions, Roar
User avatar
Hambone
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8175
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 10:25 pm
Location: Living in PG when not at BC Place, Grey Cup or Mazatlan.

David wrote:
Tue Nov 10, 2020 12:55 pm
The dots are starting to be connected. A plausible scenario goes like this. Mike is deciding whether to stay in Edmonton where he's happy or move across the Rockies to play closer to home. Tough choice but something enticing usually has to be offered to make someone leave a good situation.

Yes, the $725K was a factor. But a shrewd agent could say, "that's not enough to get Mike to move." Then Ed says, "what's it going to take to get Mike here?" The agent says "you need to come up a bit." Ed says, "I can't do that. This is already a generous offer, he'll be the highest paid player in the league." The agent goes, "not according to what the Argos are prepared to pay BLM." So Ed goes, "I tell you what. I can't pay more money. This is the highest we'll go. But how about we give Mike guaranteed money? Just between us."

Maybe not word-for-word, but something along these lines seems about right. The departure for personal reasons didn't quite pass the smell test. My sense was, why would he not just to take an undetermined "leave of absence?" There's not a lot going on around the league right now.

DH :cool:
Could very well be the scenario David. My sense is that the $250K guaranteed is part of the $725K salary. Normally that would not be an issue unless something totally unforeseen like a once-in-a-century pandemic kiboshed the season. From Reilly's standpoint it would be a good thing to have as it might act as a very strong deterrent to the Lions opting to outright cut him to get out from under the contract.

What I question is why wasn't that all covered in the contract unless Hervey didn't think Braley would agree to it. That it wasn't registered with the CFL and Braley and LeLacheur were unaware points to something Hervey agreed to on his own maybe thinking there was no way it could bite him in the ass. There was really no reason to think Reilly wouldn't be doing what was necessary to earn that money.
You're as old as you've ever been and as young as you're ever going to be.
Post Reply