2011 Bombers eerily reminiscent of 1990 squad

The Place for BC Lion Discussion. A forum for Lions fans to talk and chat about our team.
Discussion, News, Information and Speculation regarding the BC Lions and the CFL.
Prowl, Growl and Roar!

Moderator: Team Captains

Post Reply
User avatar
Toppy Vann
Hall of Famer
Posts: 9789
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 12:56 pm

Fans shouldn't be planning the victory parade just yet. While the Lions are heading into GC firing on all cylinders and then some this story about the 1990 Bombers who in BC Place won 50 - 11 over the Tracy Ham led Eskimos. Interesting parallels between some very good players then and now.

I doubt this game indoors is going to be a cake walk for either team.

http://www.canada.com/sports/football/c ... story.html

By Paul Wiecek, Winnipeg Free Press November 22, 2011

The first part of the story is the set up where the writer says this about the Bombers only to reveal after that this was the description of the 1990 Bombers where the author says:

Stop me if any of this sounds familiar: A football team with an unbelievable defence but a so-so offence overcomes its own imbalances - and the collected wisdom of the brain trust that passes for the sporting media in this country - to finish first in the CFL East Division.

Their quarterback is both lovable and tough-as-nails - and the guys would go through walls for him - but he puts up very modest numbers and could best be described as a blue-collar guy.

The defence is near the top of the league in many major categories and the secondary is phenomenal. The offence is near the bottom in many major categories but gets by on opportunism and a couple of big-play guys.

Basically, they're a lopsided team trying to prove that not only does defence win championships, if the defence is good enough it can almost single-handedly win a championship.

They host the East Division final, despite having lost two of their final three regular-season games. The contest is played on frigid and frozen turf, it's a defensive struggle and they win the low-scoring game to advance to play the following weekend in the Grey Cup at BC Place in Vancouver.

They are big underdogs heading into the big game - and not many are giving them much of a chance against a much more well-rounded opponent led by a talented young quarterback who puts up a lot of points on the scoreboard and has proven himself to be the most valuable player in the league.

So what's the party trick? The trick, as most diehard Bombers fans know, is that everything you just read was a description of the 1990 Winnipeg team.
His parallels are:

The parallels to that 1990 team and the one that advanced to this year's Grey Cup with a win over Hamilton on Sunday couldn't be more striking. Substitute quarterback Tom Burgess for Buck Pierce. Substitute big-play guys Perry Tuttle and James Murphy for Clarence Denmark and Terrence Edwards. Robert Mimbs is Chris Garrett. Less Browne is Jonathan Hefney. Greg Battle, that year's outstanding defensive player, is Jovon Johnson, this year's outstanding defensive player nominee.

While there are some who might balk at the mere suggestion, Mike Riley becomes Paul LaPolice. And before you get all superior, consider this: Riley was named coach of the year in 1990 for his job with that squad - and it says here that is precisely the same honour LaPolice is going to win for his job with this team.
"Ability without character will lose." - Marv Levy
User avatar
B.C.FAN
Team Captain
Posts: 12579
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 10:28 pm

Interesting read. That was one of the most lopsided Grey Cups in recent history. I can see the Lions losing if they make some uncharacteristic turnovers and then panic and start forcing the ball. Hamilton capitalized on 5 B.C. turnovers to hang a 42-10 defeat on the Lions in Week 18. However, I can't see this Winnipeg team scoring 40 or 50 points under any circumstances and I can't see the Lions panicking if the early breaks go against them.
User avatar
CatsEyes
Hall of Famer
Posts: 3035
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 6:18 pm
Location: Looking forward

Did the 1990 team lose 7 of its last 10 games? ;)
Real women wear orange!!
TheLionKing
Hall of Famer
Posts: 25103
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 10:13 pm
Location: Vancouver

CatsEyes wrote:Did the 1990 team lose 7 of its last 10 games? ;)
:wink: :wink:
User avatar
sj-roc
Hall of Famer
Posts: 7539
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 2:39 pm
Location: Kerrisdale

TheLionKing wrote:
CatsEyes wrote:Did the 1990 team lose 7 of its last 10 games? ;)
:wink: :wink:
I was thinking the same thing.

So I checked, they were actually 6-4 down the stretch, twice as many wins as this edition.
Sports can be a peculiar thing. When partaking in fiction, like a book or movie, we adopt a "Willing Suspension of Disbelief" for enjoyment's sake. There's a similar force at work in sports: "Willing Suspension of Rationality". If you doubt this, listen to any conversation between rival team fans. You even see it among fans of the same team. Fans argue over who's the better QB or goalie, and selectively cite stats that support their views while ignoring those that don't.
User avatar
CatsEyes
Hall of Famer
Posts: 3035
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 6:18 pm
Location: Looking forward

I rest my case ;)
Real women wear orange!!
Post Reply