Stamps at Lions Oct. 16, 2021

The Place for BC Lion Discussion. A forum for Lions fans to talk and chat about our team.
Discussion, News, Information and Speculation regarding the BC Lions and the CFL.
Prowl, Growl and Roar!

Moderator: Team Captains

Post Reply
User avatar
tedbear
Starter
Posts: 191
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 9:24 am

Sir Purrcival wrote:
Wed Oct 20, 2021 11:10 am
I agree with most of that and I think that there isn't little point to stirring the pot now by making wholesale changes but the coaching staff may not want to be too comfortable in the off season if the team continues in the current vein. Most significantly in my books is the ongoing, never ending search for a defensive line that can put significant pressure on the opposition. How many years have we been talking about that? 10, 15? It is ridiculous. The same can be said about our Offensive line. When was the last time that those on this board could generally agree we had a top notch Oline? Was it the Murphy, Jimenez (sp?) era? Cause I can't seem to think of anytime recently where we have been able to say that we have had QB protection that is necessary to do that job.

Our run game basically went with Andrew Harris. We have had some success there during brief interludes but nothing sustained. I don't know what it is with this organization but the issues that seem a plain as day never seem to get adequately addressed. It just goes on and on and in the off season we will see new signings and they will supposedly be the answer and then they fall short by a considerable margin. Just look at our DLine. Is there one name that jumps out as above average? or even average? . If the goal is to win, then what has been done isn't good enough by a long shot and hasn't been for some time.
Your point on the offensive line is quite interesting. Other than Winnipeg, I think all teams are in the same boat with weak or below average offensive lines. Winnipeg wins games because their offensive and defensive lines are superior to everyone else. They are fortunate to have 3 very good starting Canadians who have been injury free and played every game for them this year.

We have 3 of the top ten paid offensive lineman on our line. Figueroa (4th) $139k, Chungh (5th) 139k, and Mathews (10) $126k

Part of the reason for our poor offensive line play this year is the injuries to our tackles as Mathews has only played one game and Figueroa missed a couple. On top of that Chungh has had a very poor season.

But I believe that the overall poor offensive line play on our team and in our league is due to the amount of Canadians that teams put on the offensive line. Teams always stack their offensive lines with Canadians. For instance last game we started 2 Canadians on defence and 7 on offence ( which includes 3 on the offensive line)

It is tough to find good starting Canadian Offensive linemen that can compete with all the Imports that are on the defensive side of the ball. But the bigger problem is, if one or two of your offensive linemen get injured in a game or during the season, the drop off in talent is very steep when you replace a starter with a backup.

If an import offensive lineman goes down it is relatively easy to find another one of similar capabilities.

The only team this year that has had their starting QB start every game has been Winnipeg. Its not surprising that they also have the best offensive line. I find it puzzling that teams continue to risk their quarterbacks to injury by plugging so many Canadians on to the offensive line.

One solution is to drop the amount of Canadians that start and let the best players play. If the Canadians are good enough then so be it. We as fans are paying top dollar to see the games. We should not have to watch inferior talent, just because Canadian players are guaranteed a spot over a player that may be better than them.

One of the reasons our defence got ravaged against Winnipeg was the very poor play of Canadian safety Thompson. If he was an American he would never play a down in the CFL.

I am sure that purists out there would not be happy if we did not keep the guaranteed Canadian spots But if the CFL wants to keep their marquee quarterbacks healthy and the fans coming to the games, they should change the ratio that keeps the same amount of Canadians on offence and defence, or at least a rule where you need to have the same amount of Imports on you defensive and offensive lines.

I got on a bit of a rant because every year our offensive line is over matched, and not just our team but most teams in this league have weak offensive lines, which results in more opportunities for quarterbacks to get injured. The common denominator to this problem is the amount of Canadians on the offensive line.
User avatar
Hambone
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8218
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 10:25 pm
Location: Living in PG when not at BC Place, Grey Cup or Mazatlan.

BC 1988 wrote:
Wed Oct 20, 2021 11:32 am

Dr Henry has a hardline, no compromise, reputation with the NHL going back to the 2020 bubble proposals. That gave the Canucks a good reason to agree to delay the home opener as long as possible. If Rogers Arena was located in Fort St John, there's no way there would be full capacity on the 26th (even Abbotsford will continue with capacity restrictions for the time being.)
https://bc.ctvnews.ca/canucks-banking-o ... -1.5598458
https://vancouversun.com/news/local-new ... nd-parties
As I don't have kids to deal with or consider I don't follow the Covid reg rules for anybody other than myself. Dr. Bonnie did say that this loosening coincides with October 24 when it will be mandatory for everyone 12 and over to provide their BC Covid Vax card to access most events, services and businesses. I thought that was already in place but to be honest the only places I've had to show it is at the last 2 Lions games and at pubs and restaurants I've frequented in PG, Edmonton and Vancouver over the past 4 or 5 weeks. Seems that the 24th will usher in some more stringent regs and with that and increasing vaccination levels makes it easier to justify opening up Rogers and BCP to full crowds. I think it's merely coincidence that it's happening just before the Canucks' season opener. Henry does come across as sympathetic, yet unwavering, to the concerns of all sports teams. Had the Canucks started at home 2 weeks ago it would have been to 50% capacity just like the pre-season and the Lions and Whitecaps to date.
You're as old as you've ever been and as young as you're ever going to be.
User avatar
Hambone
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8218
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 10:25 pm
Location: Living in PG when not at BC Place, Grey Cup or Mazatlan.

tedbear wrote:
Wed Oct 20, 2021 12:56 pm
The only team this year that has had their starting QB start every game has been Winnipeg. Its not surprising that they also have the best offensive line. I find it puzzling that teams continue to risk their quarterbacks to injury by plugging so many Canadians on to the offensive line.
Fajardo has also started every game for the Riders. Harker came in to relieve Fajardo in the 3rd quarter of the Banjo Bowl when he suffered some sort of shoulder/neck injury on a run. He was back at the helm starting when the Riders hosted the Argos the following week. Fajardo hadn't missed a snap up all season until that Banjo Bowl injury and hasn't missed a snap in the 4 games since.

In the race for the Maytag Repairman Award for least used #2 QB Harker has 13 pass attempts and 3 carries in 23 minutes of action all in one game. McGuire has 21 carries and 3 pass attempts while getting his number called for cameo appearances in 8 of 10 games.
You're as old as you've ever been and as young as you're ever going to be.
User avatar
tedbear
Starter
Posts: 191
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 9:24 am

Yes you are correct, I remembered him getting hurt but did not realize he started the next game
Post Reply