While the upside he hasn't got the disruption of Tillman to deal with from here on. The downside is the QB situation.B.C.FAN wrote:Nothing Tillman has said about this trade was believable. I'm not a fan of Kavis Reed's hothead style but he's the only person with class in the gong show that runs the Eskimos.Childress wrote:I can't understand how there can be any Tillman defenders left. The guy is a bad man and we'll be a better league and country when the guy leaves both and heads home.
I have never seen the firing of one team's GM bring so much happiness to fans of all teams. By contrast, pretty much all of the non-Eskimo fans were disappointed the day Danny M got relieved of his duties.
If he has a desire for GM he might be best to take the job if offered and hold the HC spot too and get some other top support around him. BUT he was unable to keep Stubler and that might not be his fault but it is an issue when you go recruiting. The downside is too many jobs and taking a role on as GM when you are not experienced or ready for the role. The upside given his situation where he he was Tillman's choice for GM the risk is that a new GM from outside will have less of a desire to hang his fate on the HC and these guys if the team loses all feel their guy will win so they go for a new HC.
Kavis has made some odd comments that suggest to me he has yet to fully mature as a HC where his public statements on his team and players run in parallel to what a fan sees his team doing.
I find this sort of comment a little bit odd:
> Joseph again this 2012 season is his MOP.
> Nicholls not playing. We want to win now.
> he can be OC too.
> Now 5 to 10 year setback statement being aired when he tells his team to forget the season and new slate coming.
If KJ is MOP for two years in a row yet can't close out games that are winnable, how does that square. The year before he was their MOP he hardly played! What message is that to the team as to what success looks like as an Eskimo.
Nicholls - is he on a par with where Lulay and Tate were or his like the Wpg backups? That is what they pay the HC to know.
Why not make a decision on Nicholls given the play of KJ and SJ to go with Nicholls like the Stamps and Lions did. Lulay was given the job despite Jackson there who some felt should have been given a shot over a struggling Travis. There is a balance between the old days - play as a QB and sink and be gone from football and the Wally way - develop and bring these guys with some playing time in practice and in games.
The question a GM would have to have if his HC thinks it will take 5 to 10 years to develop a winning team is this? Do I have the right HC?
I think Reed has been a pretty good coach. He needs to stop some of the blather and rah rah rah stuff. Look at the HCs that are new like Benevides who has made very few errors in statements this season. The old vets like Hufnagel and Trestman too are good role models.
The best coaches aren't always the ones who give rah rah motivating talks and ranting about "the____way" and how they say your are losers. I think Kavis did that every game he was on TSN pre and post game talking to the team.
The best coaches keep on the same message track and are consistent in what they say and they are very focused. If the fans see black, they don't try and tell them they are seeing white although I guess Wally did hit a period there when scheme was not an issue and no one bought that - not even his offense after a while. They fixed it and it's been great since. The best don't tell players to go home and forget the season they just screwed up. The focus has to be on the lessons.
No question that the Esks had every right to make a change. I am no fan of a GM not living in your community as that does not grow the CFL and as a fan of many years to me that is one of the most vital roles that a GM has to play in the community. The fans want to hear from the team leadership - GM and HC and if you can't be in the same community then even if is not your fault you need to move on.