20090620 Training Camp Observations, Saturday

The Place for BC Lion Discussion. A forum for Lions fans to talk and chat about our team.
Discussion, News, Information and Speculation regarding the BC Lions and the CFL.
Prowl, Growl and Roar!

Moderator: Team Captains

User avatar
Rammer
Team Captain
Posts: 22320
Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2002 6:04 pm
Location: Coquitlam, B.C.

pennw wrote:So who do we want as our starting DE , Foley or Rayford ? We can't have both in one spot .
Interesting question and one that will be difficult for the Lions to decide upon. The ration factor enters into this decision more than any other one on the team I suspect. If Rayford was to win out, the NI numbers have to work elsewhere, plus now Nauten M-L becomes depth on the depth that Foley gives to BJ's spot. Crazy having that kind of depth at a DE position with NI talent when in the past it is considered a ratio breaker position. The answer you look for may work itself out on the Eskimo game.
Entertainment value = an all time low
User avatar
B.C.FAN
Team Captain
Posts: 12591
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 10:28 pm

JohnHenry wrote:I think the Lions are planning on starting eight non-imports, rather than the required seven, if R. Foley is the starter. I assume they would keep an import DE as backup or designated import?
The Lions look to have eight non-import starters, but I doubt that an import defensive end would be kept on the active roster with McKay-Loescher available to back up the non-import starters. The Lions normally use the three designated import positions for extra linebackers, defensive backs, receivers or running backs, at least one of whom would be a kick returner.
User avatar
WestCoastJoe
Hall of Famer
Posts: 17721
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 8:55 pm

Possible non-import starters ...

Left guard

Valli or Hameister-Ries

Centre

Reid

Right guard

Haji-Rasouli

Fullback

Bwenge or Lumbala

Receiver

Jackson

Defensive end

Johnson

Foley (possibly)

Linebacker

Glatt
..............

Future possibilities

Matt Carter ... could be ready fairly soon

Justin Sorensen ... a year or two away

Yurichuk ... by next year, if not sooner

Crawford ... close, if not there already
User avatar
WestCoastJoe
Hall of Famer
Posts: 17721
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 8:55 pm

afternoon practice, Saturday, June 20

QBs

It seems to me the QBs have been instructed to tuck the ball away and run if the passing play is not there almost at once. Although it might seem like too many broken plays, or giving up on a play too soon, in many ways it would make sense. Running lanes are wide open for a mobile quarterback in this league. Burris really showed that in the Grey Cup. A mobile QB can be your best running back. I would say the QB is no more likely to get hurt running than he is as a sitting duck in the pocket. Just look for a good opportunity to hook slide (Right, Buck?).

Mixed results. Buck about the same. Jarious about the same (some head shaking throws, some awesome throws). Zac and Travis looking more in the flow at times than the QBs ahead of them. One thing I remember about Dave Dickenson in his prime. He was so efficient. He almost always got all that there was to be had from a play, even in practice. He got the ball to the right place. And like Bill Walsh taught, the receiver got the ball in a precise location relative to his body, so that he could instantly turn on the jets.

RBs

Ian Smart #1, but also looking like #1 as kick returner. We'll see how Wally sorts that out. IMO Martell Mallett is ahead of Damian Sims. Emmanuel Marc eager to get into the fray.

Receivers

Rufus Skillern looks to me like his hand eye coordination is not the best. Even in receiver drills with JC, he drops passes. No change with the others since last report. Great crop of young receivers, including the 2 Canucks, Hetherington and Carter. Otis Amey made a sensational leaping catch on a long ball over the middle.

O Line

Many banged up bodies: JHR in a sling, Marquez limping, Valli not 100%, Sherko not 100%, Jones not 100%. Thank you for Justin Sorensen. Worked at right guard and right tackle. Did a nice job pass blocking against Caesar Rayford more than once. Slowed him to a stop at the edge of the pocket.

D Line

Hunt and Gibbs and Williams looking very good in the middle. Loud, obnoxious, funny and good in the middle. Foley seeming to win the rush end spot almost by default. IMO Brown and Butler have not shown much. Rayford interesting, but I still ask: can he play? I have not seen any tape. Walter Stith manhandled Gary Butler one time, with GB ending up pinned on the ground. Murphy would have jumped on with a body slam for the complete pancake. :wink:

DBs

Lots of work for Heyward, it seems. Crawford not practicing. Dante Marsh dangerous for QBs and receivers on the corner. 2 picks out of 9 thrown his way.

LBs

The great mystery. Jerome Dennis seems to be starting LB #3, sort of, mostly pass coverage running with his back to the QB. Terna Nande seems to be LB #3 on obvious running downs. Glatt and McKenzie seem to be regular starters. Heyward, Smith and Yurichuk are in the mix.

I have concerns: have we solidified our schemes and personnel from last year, when it seems to me we were poor against the run? Once runners like Cobourne or even Foord broke it off tackle, it was a sprint to the end zone. With our ends sealed as they rush wide, our DTs and "run-stopping" LBs are no doubt outmanned on the off tackle stretch run. As the runner breaks the line, he sees the backs of the DBs running away from him, still in pass coverage. Nice!

If Javy can't get there, or misses the tackle, the RB is off to the races. 2 of the LBs seem to have more pass coverage responsibility than run stopping responsibility. If you don't have a fire breathing run stopper in there somewhere you are vulnerable to the run. It also seemed to me last year that Barron Miles did not have the speed to get over in time to make the tackle 15 yards down the field (last shot). The runner just flew past him.

On the off tackle run, it is bit wide for the DTs, especially if they too get sealed inside with angle blocking.
User avatar
Area51
All Star
Posts: 343
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 4:05 pm

I think it's pretty obvious that a 6'1 220lb DE won't cut it in any league....as evidenced by getting pancaked in practice. Makes you wonder how badly he's be dominated in a real game. Unfortunately, if Wally's looking to show what a "gem" he found south of the border, Butler may be kept. Make zero sense since that would give them 5 DE's. Butler & the team would be much better served at LB. As for Rayford, I still find it hard to believe he can spend a year on the PR and start the next season.

I don't trust Valli and I'd much rather see a NI used at G. Or at LB if Glatt continues to be as useless at stopping the run as he was last year. Then again, he's one of Wally's golden boys so that's not going to happen.
Post Reply