Leos Prepare for Riders

The Place for BC Lion Discussion. A forum for Lions fans to talk and chat about our team.
Discussion, News, Information and Speculation regarding the BC Lions and the CFL.
Prowl, Growl and Roar!

Moderator: Team Captains

Blitz
Team Captain
Posts: 9094
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 8:44 am

Our B.C. Lions prepare to play the Saskatchewan Rough Riders on Saturday. The game is important for a number of reasons.

Our Leos are presently tied for second place with the Blue Bombers. Both teams have two games remaining on their schedule. The Bombers have back to back games with Ottawa while we play the Riders away and then back at home. We really have to win both of these games and hope the Bombers lose one to Ottawa, in order for our Leos to secure a home playoff berth.

Our Leos had lost two in a row and three of their last four, before defeating Edmonton last weekend. It was a hard fought contest that our Leos lead from early in the game.

The Riders had won four in a row before losing to Montreal last weekend. The Als have a formidable defence and that defence played very well in defeating Saskatchewan.

Our Leos will be playing before a capacity crowd, as its the last game for the Riders at Mosaic Stadium. The Riders are pumped to say goodbye to their stadium with a win. The Riders are a very improved team since the start of the year.

Lets have a closer look:

DEFENCE

Our defense is the unit that needs to improve its play a lot if we are going to have a hope of playing in the Big Dance this year.

They will be facing Darian Durrant, who has quietly had a very good season this year. Durrant sits in fourth place in the quarterback standings just behind Jonathan Jennings. Durrant has completed 67.3% of his passes compared to Jennings 67.4%. Durrant has a 94.7 quarterback efficiency average compared to Jennings 101.3.

Jennings stats have continued to improve this season and his quarterback efficiency average would be leading the CFL, had Jennings not thrown so many interceptions in his previous three contests against the Eskimos and Bombers, before going error free against the Eskimos last weekend.

Naaomon Roosevelt was the Riders leading receiver this season, catching almost 1100 yds, in 11 games before getting injured. But the Riders have Ricky Collins, Celeb Holly, Rob Bagg, and Nic Demski and they are all good quality receivers. Shawmad Chambers, when he enters a game, is a big target.

The Riders rushing attack ranks 8th this season. It's more of a threat with Curtis Steele at tailback, as he averaged 5.8 yds per rush. Joe McNight was the Riders tailback last game and they use him. Darian Durrant is also a threat to run on every pass play and we don't need to be reminded of what he did to us in the 2013 playoff game.

The Riders have also given up 48 sacks this season, second worst in the CFL.

So, if our defence can get good pressure on Durrant, it would be the key to a good defensive game. However, defensive pressure has been a problem for our Leos defence for a number of games now. Washington needs to make some adaptions to our predictable blitz package. Alex Bazzie needs to get back to his early season form. Hopefully Westerman will return and we'll also dress Bryant Turner Jr. rather than Darius Allen, if Westerman can play.

Our defensive line had 0 tackles last game and no sacks. If we want to become a successful playoff team, this is the area in need of our most improvement.

OFFENCE

Jonathan Jennings is having an incredible year. Our offence is the second leading point scoring offence in the CFL. Last game, Jennings played much more conservatively to avoid interceptions. Its a fine line between attacking a defense and not throwing interceptions, especially with the style of our offensive scheme, which is a vertical scheme favoring passing the deep ball and the deep intermediate ball. It also often does not have check down receiver on passing plays.

Jennings will be throwing to two receivers in Manny and Burnham, who are both having exceptional seasons. Manny is 3rd in CFL receiving while Burnham is 5th. Burnham has the best reception average per catch in the CFL. (18.1 yds. per catch). Shawn Gore is always a receiving threat.

The receiver that we need to utilize more in our passing attack is Sinkfield. Sinkfield is averaging 53 yds. per game in receptions for our Leos. But Sinkfield only had 21 yards in receptions on 3 catches (7 yd. average per reception) and is his speed is not being used, when he lines up at outside slot in our five receiver set. Last game, we did line up Sinkfield in a tight inside slot a few times. We need to use his speed deep and also on more crossing patterns.

My guess is that we will start Allen at tailback this week, to keep Johnson fresh for the playoffs. Johnson had an excellent game against the Eskimos and our running attack, which had struggled against the Bombers whether Allen or Johnson started, looked revitalized against the Eskimos last game.

In fact, early in that game, our passing game was struggling but once our running game got going, it changed everything. Allen has a 50 yds. per carry average, so he can get the job done.

Chris Rainey has an eye jumping 8.1 yds. per carry rush average this season, when he comes into the game as a rotational tailback.He also averages 9.5 yds. per catch coming out of the backfield. Both are CFL bests so Rainey adds a special dimension when he enters our offence.

Our Leos rank 6th in the CFL in terms of red zone percentage success. To make matters even worse, Wally often will not gamble on third and one inside the red zone, which makes us even less effective than our 6th place ranking. This is a major area for improvement for Khari Jones. Khari Jones has made too many bad play calls have happened this season in the red zone and Wally's overly conservative approach on third down hasn't helped inside the red zone or out of it.

Last game, we scored 10 points, following a Wally third and one and third and two gamble. He went against his tendency and it worked for us.

Last game the play of Hunter Steward, Jovan Olifioye and Cody Husband was the key to our improved offensive line play. But Antonio Johnson had his struggles and needs to play better. Fabian also needs to step up his game for the Riders.

The Riders defense has improved dramatically in recent weeks. The addition of Willie Jefferson really changes their defense. Jefferson is very hard to block as a pass rusher. He will make A.C. Leonard, converted to tight end by Chris Jones better. Leonard has 5 sacks on the season. Greg Jones is having an excellent season as the Riders middle linebacker.

Chris Jones has been well known for playing press man coverage and blitzing defence in his previous stints before coming to the Riders. As the Riders defense improved Jones is back to dialing up more , itzes. I'm anticipating Jones will play a fair amount of Man/Cover 2 against us, mixed in with some zone blitzes.

SPECIAL TEAMS

The Riders Tyler Crapigna has hit 87% of his field goals this season, including a 53 yarder, so if the Riders get into our end of the field they have a consistent field goal kicker who can score points. Josh Bartell averages 44.8 yds per punt.

Richie Leone has improved his field goal average to 71.4%. His punting average is 49.8 yds. per punt. Our Leos average 38 net punting yards to the Riders 34.7 yds. That should give our Leos approximately 16.5 yards of field position advantage in this game.

Chris Rainey leads the CFL in combined yards. He has the second highest punt return average in the league at 14. 2 yds. per return and leads the CFL with two punt return touchdowns. Rainey is third best in the CFL in kick return average. However, no CFL return man makes his own return yards like Rainey. If we could actually get him a block or two, he can spring a big return almost every time.

Last game our Leos lined up Shaq Murray Lawrence beside Rainey, on kick returns, as we have all season, except for the home Winnipeg game, when we lined up Sinkfield beside Rainey. Its time to get Sinkfield more involved. This is one way to utilize his speed and to keep Rainey fresh by letting Sinkfield return one kickoff per game, as we usually do Shaq.

Joe Craig returns punts for the Riders and he has the ability to pick up big yardage if he gets a couple of key blocks. He also has a 71 yard punt return touchdown this season.

In terms of kickoffs, this is perhaps the weakest area of our Leos this season. We rank 8th in the CFL in kickoff defence. Kendell Lawrence has enough ability to return kickoffs well if are coverage team doesn't stay in their lanes and play disciplined.

WRAP

Big opposition crowd. Big game.

Go Leos!! :roar: :roar: :roar: :roar: :roar:
"When I went to Catholic high school in Philadelphia, we just had one coach for football and basketball. He took all of us who turned out and had us run through a forest. The ones who ran into the trees were on the football team". (George Raveling)
Blitz
Team Captain
Posts: 9094
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 8:44 am

An interesting development coming out of Regina is that Joe McNight may not be able to play. He was injured on the last play of the Riders game against Montreal.

The Riders offence has had some good tailbacks this season. Curtis Steele was a talent. Joe McNight was one of the most recruited players coming out of high school and was seen as the next Reggie Bush. McNight was drafted in the 4th round of the NFL draft.

If McNight can't play, the Riders will turn to National tailback Greg Morris, who starred with the Westshore Rebels. Morris, can also handle kickoff and punt returns, played in the B.C.’s junior football league in the 2011 and 2012 seasons. He still holds the CJFL record for rushing yards in a game (405, set on 24 carries against Kamloops in October of 2012). 

Morris is 5'11" and 220 pounds. He has talent. Guess we'll know who will be the Riders starting tailback against us closer to game day.
"When I went to Catholic high school in Philadelphia, we just had one coach for football and basketball. He took all of us who turned out and had us run through a forest. The ones who ran into the trees were on the football team". (George Raveling)
User avatar
Belize City Lion
Hall of Famer
Posts: 3592
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:39 pm
Location: Belize City, Belize

The Lions need a quick start in this game. With all the hype and pre-game activities for the last stand at Taylor Field the Rider fans will be well into their rye and pislners long before kickoff. I expect it will be a loud and very rowdy crowd. Not the type of place you want to get down early. The Lions have much more to play for, and I really liked how focused they seemed to be last week after dropping two games they should have won against Winnipeg. My only concern there is that last week JJ looked a bit too concerned with not making a mistake. Maybe he just needed that one INT free game to get his mojo back, but he needs to look at his second and third options a bit more if he is to get back to being the game changer QB we have seen most of the season.

Philips may be running out of time to add picks to his amazing career stats. He has feasted on Durant in years past. Hopefully Saturday is another big game for him.

My biggest concern is Leone. I have been a Leone supporter because of his punting, but I am ready to give up on him. He has not been very good as a directional punter, and we all know that his FG kicking is unreliable and shows no signs of improving. Regina is not the place to ask a confidence challenged kicker to make a 40+ yard FG with the game on the line. While their may have been no upgades available mid-season, replacing Leone with a Canadian kicker would have opened up an import roster spot. Imagine going into the playoffs with both Johnson and Allen in the backfield? I would gladly give up 10 yards in punting average for a kicker who can be depended on to make FGs and who can punt the ball out of bounds inside the 20 yard line. At this point I just hope Leone doesn't cost us the game because it is too late to do anything about it now.
Blitz
Team Captain
Posts: 9094
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 8:44 am

As we prepare to play the Riders and only have two games to go until playoffs, I want to focus on our Leos defence.

Most recently, the spotlight was on Jonathan Jennings, due to the interceptions thrown against the Bombers. I wrote that the issue was not Jennings alone and in fact I did not consider him most responsible for those interceptions (even though the press, media, Buono, and too many fans mostly pointed the finger at him).

Instead I believed our vertical offensive scheme, the encouragement of Jennings to throw deep or deep intermediate, and coaching/mentorship were more responsible. Jennings played things much more conservatively last game and even took some sacks rather than throw an interception.

The reality is that our Leos team would likely have struggled this season without Jennings, as it did last season when he wasn't playing. Jennings has a quarterback efficiency average of 101.3, which is impressive. Most Outstanding Player favorite Bo Levi Mitchell has a quarterback efficiency average of 107.9 to put things in perspective. Jonathan Jennings has completed 67. 4% of his passes while Bo Levi has completed 68% of his passes. Bo Levi Mitchell gets to play in a much better scheme and throw less difficult passes.

Jonathan Jennings has had an amazing year as a starter in his first full season in the quarterback position. Bo Levi Mitchell has a lot of experience. In a one game shoot out, there is no quarterback in the CFL who could dual with Bo Levi in the way Jonathan Jennings has the ability to do...because no other quarterback can make the kind of plays that Jennings can.

Our offence has scored the second most points in the CFL this season. Jennings has moved into second place in the CFL quarterback rankings. The Manny Show and the Bryan Burnham Show are a reality this season due to the opportunity of having Jennings as their quarterback. Both know, not only that Jennings will get them the football if they are open but he will throw it to a purrfect spot if they are not. Khari Jones gets to get a lot better sleeps at night this season, than he did in 2014, because Jennings makes his offensive scheme and play calling look a hell of a lot better than it really is.

So, offence is not our problem going into the playoffs, although some scheme adjustments are necessary. We're averaging 30 points per game.

But defensively, there are areas of concern that seriously need to be addressed before the playoffs. Our defense ranks 4th in the CFL in points allowed. That's not good enough to beat a Calgary or a Winnipeg in the playoffs. Our defense ranks 5th in the CFL in the amount of yards per play we give up - 6.52 yds. per play. We're 5th in red zone defence.

Our defense ranks 4th in terms of average yds. per run against (4.8 yds. per rush) but a mind blowing stat is that our defence ranks last in the CFL in terms of yds. given up per pass play (8.7 yds. per pass). We're tied with Benevedes defence in Edmonton and Jones defence in Regina in this stat. Both of those defenses had their early struggles but have improved - while ours has not.

B.C. Fan often talks about the importance of winning the turnover battle. Yet our Leos have a winning record this season while being -7 for the season. To provide a comparison Winnipeg is +31 on the season and Calgary is +22. Nor is the problem mainly our offence. Our offence ranks 3rd lowest in the CFL in giveaways, even with our more recent interceptions. Its that we rank 8th in takeaways with 24 takeaways this season. To compare the Bombers have 54 takeaways and Calgary has 44 takeaways.

Defensive turnovers can turn a game around. They can change momentum in a heart beat. They are inspiring for an offence. They change field position dramatically and they often lead to scores. We don't get those type of plays in a game very often.

We don't create turnovers on defence (tied for last with Saskatchewan) and we give up a lot of yards on average for opposition pass e pass play. If the argument was that we are a conservative "bend but don't break" defence it would be easier to live with. But we are not a bend but don't break defense. We've given up 54 big plays (over 30 yards) which rank us 8th in the CFL. (In the meanwhile our offence has created 61 big plays (only 5 less than CFL leading Calgary)

A positive defensive stat us that our defense is 3rd in the CFL in sacks. But that stat is misleading, in that we were leading the CFL in sacks for a good chunk of the season and we are no longer a defense that gets a lot of sacks in a game. Alex Bazzie has seriously dropped off. He was leading the CFL for a big portion of the season but now Charleton Hughes, Shawn Lemon, and John Chick have soared past him.

Nor should the pressure to sack the quarterback be on Bazzie's shoulders. While Westerman, Roh, Menard, Bryant Turner Jr. have all chiped in, Brooks has 0 sacks and Darius Allen has 1 sack. Our linebackers are not getting sacks any more because our blitzes are now easy to pick up or we are using Bighill as a deep safety while forcing Sol E to cover the quarterback and the underneath stuff in the interior area of our defense.

Our defense also gives up a ton of plays in the flat area, as well as too many deep balls. By having our corners play off and our linebacker or linebackers covering the underneath hook zone areas we give up a lot of plays to receivers and tailbacks in the flat area. We're susceptible to hitch screens and jailbreak screens as well.

Most of the tackles made against the run are made by our linebackers. Last game, for example, against Edmonton, the Eskimos ran the football 14 times and only one tackle was made by a defensive lineman.

Some will look to personell and that is the first place to look. Certainly Brook's play has not been stellar and Darius Allen, when he plays is almost useless as an International rotational defensive end.

In the defensive backfield, we lost Lee but Clarke did an even better job there for a couple of games until he was injured. Gaitor stepped in and was excellent at boundary halfback. When Yell got hurt, we moved Gaitor to boundary corner and inserted Fenner at halfback. Those changes didn't help but most other CFL teams have been forced to make more changes in their defensive backfield this season than our Leos have and Clarke, Gaitor, and Fenner have not hurt us. Fenner had an excellent game against Edmonton.

So, in taking those stats and other factors into consideration what is the big picture of our defense?

THE TREND, THE PATTERN OF OUR DEFENSIVE PLAY

At the start of the season our defense was excellent. It shut down Calgary and played very well overall in the first part of the season. That tells me the talent was there. Sure, there were a couple of positions that could have stood improvement. But this trend has always been the pattern of a Mark Washington defence. Start the season off well and then fall apart towards the end. That happened in 2014 and 2015 under Mark Washington. His defences regress from the start of a season while others improve.

DEFENDING THE RUN

It would be easy to blame our defensive line personnel. But the reality is that we don't stunt or loop our defence very often or change the look of our defence up front very often either. We don't run defensive line shifts. Its basically four or three man line, with our defensive lineman lined up in the same spot each play. Therefore, our defensive lineman are much easier to run block than most other defensive lines in the league. That forces Sol E. to also focus on the run while also having heavy pass defence responsibility, covering the hook zones, as well as racing to cover the flat area.

DEFENDING THE PASS

Washington runs a ton of zone defence. Our defensive backs are instructed to give a lot of space, rather than play aggressively. The best example is Ryan Phillips. He may not be the greatest tackler in the world but he is an outstanding cover guy and he is an excellent ball hawk. Yet he only has one interception.

Gaitor has two but he hasn't been trained enough in passive play yet. Purifoy began this season with interceptions, forced turnovers, and sacks. Now he is much more of a passive player. Mike Edem had 0 interceptions at safety until Jennings and Lulay worked with him after a practice - instant results. Where was Mark Washington all season as our defensive coordinator and defensive backfield coach all season? Why was he not developing Edem's play?

Passive zone defence against today's much better quarterbacks is not the solution. It might have worked in the good old days for Wally but its much tougher to do these days - a defense has to mix things up more.

LACK OF COVERAGE IN THE FLAT

With our corners playing off and our linebackers either covering the hook zone (or deep safety in Bighill's case) we leave the flat's open. Washington figures leaving it open is the least dangerous option. Every offence knows it. Remember, early in the season, when a quarterback threw to his tailback on a swing pass in the flat and was destroyed quickly by Sol E. or Bighill?

You won't see that anymore. With our defensive backs giving up a lot of space, we have Sol E. and Bighill zone covering the underneath stuff. They can't get out to the flat quickly nor can our corners come up quickly. Harris ate up our flat area when we played Winnipeg. Calgary exploited our flat area all game the last time we played them.

BORING BLITZES

We rarely blitz and when we do its so boring and predictable I can see it coming so easily that it must be even easier for opposing quarterbacks and offensive lineman to anticipate. :thdn: Basically we now only blitz Sol E. or Bighill or both in the A or B gap. The defense knows its coming. The times we blitz Bighill or Purifoy to the outside, its usually successful but its rarer than spotting a barn owl.

LACK OF AGGRESSION -SCAREDY CAT DEFENCE

At the start of this seaon our defense was much more aggressive. We used a number of personell packages. We had a variety of blitzes. We blitzed Purifoy and T.J. Lee. Thompson and Fraser were used in personell packages. We played Lokombo a lot.

Now, we have Bighill racing back to deep safety. Everyone playing off. Lokombo, Thompson, and Fraser are mostly combined to special teams. The only change we've made in recent games is to play Aragki a fair amount at linebacker, with a 3 man front, with Bighill dropping back to middle deep safety. It looks like we're playing scared. We are!! Its not working. :thdn:

In conclusion, this defense is as exciting as kissing my sister. Our defensive scheme is simple, predictable, and mediocre. If it was a conservative but bend and not break defence that would be one thing. But its not. It gives up big plays, it doesn't cover the flats, its passive, and getting more passive every game. It looks the same each game because its the same each game.

Its easy to forget, that when we won the Cup in 2006, it was our defence that led us there. Ritchie's defence was complex, hard to read, used lots of formations and packages, created turnovers regularly, and could play very aggressively or drop a lot into hard to read coverages. Our defense led the CFL in sacks and interceptions in that 2006 Grey Cup winning season.

Our 2011 defence was much more simple but our defensive front was so good that we made it hell for opposition quarterbacks and running backs. The focus of that season's success is usually on Lulay, Simon, Harris, and Arlanhd Bruce but it was our defence, giving up the least points in the CFL, that was the most important reason we won that Grey Cup.

If we want to have the best chance of winning in the playoffs, we have to take the pressure off Jennings and Company to get us there. Our defence has to get better and in a hurry.

In order to do that, Mark Washinton needs to change direction and quickly. He needs to get back to how he schemed at the start of this season. Obviously, playing smart defence is necessary. No one wins with unnecessary risk. But fear never wins over courage either.
"When I went to Catholic high school in Philadelphia, we just had one coach for football and basketball. He took all of us who turned out and had us run through a forest. The ones who ran into the trees were on the football team". (George Raveling)
User avatar
B.C.FAN
Team Captain
Posts: 12590
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 10:28 pm

Blitz wrote:Our defense is the unit that needs to improve its play a lot if we are going to have a hope of playing in the Big Dance this year.
The B.C. defence is an anomaly. The Lions are in the middle of the pack in defensive points allowed, when points off turnovers and special teams are removed from the equation. Yet they rank first or second in the league in several key defensive categories:

1st
Scrimmage plays allowed (53.9/game)
First downs allowed (322)
Rushing attempts against (247)

2nd
Passing TDs against (23)
Net yards allowed (351.5/game)
Passing attempts against (558)

The weakness of the defence is the big play. The Lions have given up 34 pass completions of over 30 yards, the worst total in the league, and the average yards per catch given up is 8.7 yards, tied for worst in the league. Only Toronto has given up more big plays overall.

Similarly, the B.C. offence also rank first or second in the league in several key categories:

1st:
Rushing yards (109.6/game)
Rushing touchdowns (22)
Rushing attempts (328)
Average gain per rush (5.4)
Yards per play (6.97)

2nd:
Points scored (30.0/game)
Touchdowns (49)
Offensive touchdowns (45)
Average gain per pass (9.3 yards)
First-down yardage (7.1)
Second down conversions (52.9%)
Big plays - total (61)

The weakness of the B.C. offence is interceptions. Jonathon Jennings has thrown more interceptions (13) than any other quarterback. Five of B.C.'s six losses can be attributed to turnovers, primarily to careless late interceptions. The Lions have given up 75 points off turnovers, more than any other team with a winning record.

Winnipeg and Calgary lead the league in turnover margin at plus 31 and plus 22, respectively. Winnipeg has scored an incredible 146 points off turnovers, including 26 in the two narrow victories over B.C. The Lions and Stampeders are both undefeated in games in which they won the turnover battle. To get through the playoffs, the B.C. offence needs to control turnovers and not beat themselves.

Last week's victory over Edmonton was a huge improvement all around. The Lions didn't turn the ball over at all. Jennings took three sacks rather than risk throwing the ball downfield when he didn't see anyone open. The B.C. defence didn't allow a completion of over 21 yards against Mike Reilly and Edmonton's high-powered offence. That's the formula that wins games down the stretch and in the playoffs.
TheLionKing
Hall of Famer
Posts: 25103
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 10:13 pm
Location: Vancouver

Both our offence and defence have become more conservative as the season progressed.
Blitz
Team Captain
Posts: 9094
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 8:44 am

Here are a few questions for you B.C. Fan.

How do we avoid interceptions when our offence is a big play vertical offence that favors the deep and deep intermediate pass? How does Jennings not throw into double coverage when defences play us Man/Cover 2, so most deep intermediate or deep balls will involve double coverage - the man covering the receiver and the safety?

How does Jennings throw to his favorite receivers when most of the time Arseneaux and Burham are running deep intermediate routes or deeper by design. Sometimes we'll have a pass play where Manny runs a shorter route but usually when we need a critical second down only?

Its easy to say "Don't throw interceptions Jennings"! Even last game, while being more careful, Jennings threw into double coverage twice.

A second question B.C. Fan? How do you explain all the big plays our defence gives up? We're in Cover 2 or Cover 3 most of the time? That is supposed to minimize big plays.

Thirdly, if turnovers are so important (and I think they're important too or I wouldn't have been *beeotch* so much prior to Jennings interceptions against Winnipeg about us throwing into double coverage so much) why do we have the same record as Winnipeg and the third best record in the CFL when Winnipeg has such a positive turnover differential and our Leos are minus 7 in takeaways and giveaways?

And finally what do you think happened that caused our offence (or say Jennings) to throw so many interceptions against Edmonton and Winnipeg, when he had only thrown 7 interceptions in his first 12 games? Jennings gained more experience as the season progressed. How do you account for the change? In other words, what do you think was the cause?
"When I went to Catholic high school in Philadelphia, we just had one coach for football and basketball. He took all of us who turned out and had us run through a forest. The ones who ran into the trees were on the football team". (George Raveling)
User avatar
B.C.FAN
Team Captain
Posts: 12590
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 10:28 pm

Blitz wrote:Here are a few questions for you B.C. Fan.

How do we avoid interceptions when our offence is a big play vertical offence that favors the deep and deep intermediate pass? How does Jennings not throw into double coverage when defences play us Man/Cover 2, so most deep intermediate or deep balls will involve double coverage - the man covering the receiver and the safety?

How does Jennings throw to his favorite receivers when most of the time Arseneaux and Burham are running deep intermediate routes or deeper by design. Sometimes we'll have a pass play where Manny runs a shorter route but usually when we need a critical second down only?

Its easy to say "Don't throw interceptions Jennings"! Even last game, while being more careful, Jennings threw into double coverage twice.

Good questions. One of Jennings' strengths is his accuracy. He can confidently drop the ball into tight windows against zone coverage. Many quarterbacks wouldn't attempt a lot of the throws he has made. Another strength is his chemistry with Arceneaux and Burnham. He can throw 50-50 jump balls and trust his receivers to come down with the ball or make sure the defender doesn't. Nothing has to change. Some of his interceptions are not his fault, of course. His biggest weakness, and the one he addressed last game with Wally's help, is his tendency to throw careless late interceptions. The deep ball to Gore on first down that was intercepted by Fogg to set up Winnipeg's tying touchdown in the recent game at B.C. Place was an example, along with the deep OT pass to Gore in the end zone in Calgary that clinched the Stamps' victory, when a chip-shot field goal would have tied the game and forced a second OT. Lately Wally has been preaching the importance of ball security and playing smart. The entire team has bought in. Turnovers are not all on the QB. Everyone needs to do their part.
Blitz wrote:A second question B.C. Fan? How do you explain all the big plays our defence gives up? We're in Cover 2 or Cover 3 most of the time? That is supposed to minimize big plays.
Our secondary isn't breaking to the ball. Even when they're in position, they seem to give up deep completions instead of knocking the ball down or making interceptions. The lack of interceptions by the secondary is a key sign that the players aren't good enough or aggressive enough. The Lions have settled on Edem as their safety. He makes big hits, and had his first two interceptions in the second Winnipeg game, but for my money Eric Fraser got to the ball faster and broke up more deep balls than Edem when he was the starter. Ryan Phillips is a great veteran who can read patterns and break up short passes but he has been a liability on deep balls and has been targeted by some opponents, notably Ottawa and Calgary. Brandon Stewart, as you have noted, has often struggled at field corner. The Lions have used Thompson, Purifoy and Bighill as safeties in their Cover 2 or Cover 3 defences. I thought Thompson was the most effective of the three in defending against deep balls early in the season but he seldom sees the field any more. Bighill should not be used as a safety.
Blitz wrote:Thirdly, if turnovers are so important (and I think they're important too or I wouldn't have been *beeotch* so much prior to Jennings interceptions against Winnipeg about us throwing into double coverage so much) why do we have the same record as Winnipeg and the third best record in the CFL when Winnipeg has such a positive turnover differential and our Leos are minus 7 in takeaways and giveaways?
That's easy. Winnipeg lives off turnovers. Turnovers are the reason they are 10-6. The Bombers have scored 146 points off turnovers and given up 49. Almost one-third of their scoring has come from turnovers. The Lions are 10-6 despite their minus-7 turnover ratio. They might be 14-2 or 15-1 if not for the careless late turnovers they've made.

In the first B.C.-Winnipeg game, the Bombers scored 10 points off turnovers and forced a turnover on downs in the final minute inside the Winnipeg 5 yard line. They won by two points.

In the second B.C.-Winnipeg game, the Bombers scored 16 points off six B.C. turnovers, including two late turnovers when the Lions just needed to protect a fourth-quarter lead. The Bombers won by three points.

B.C.'s offence outgained the Bombers by more than 200 yards in the two games combined. Turnovers determined the outcome of both games, as they have many other games for both teams.
Blitz wrote:And finally what do you think happened that caused our offence (or say Jennings) to throw so many interceptions against Edmonton and Winnipeg, when he had only thrown 7 interceptions in his first 12 games? Jennings gained more experience as the season progressed. How do you account for the change? In other words, what do you think was the cause?
As you've documented, the Bombers and Eskimos both played a lot of Cover-2 zone or Cover-2 with man underneath to shut down Burnham and Arceneaux in particular. Great players will still make plays but the Lions need others to step up and make plays when defences are dropping eight or nine people into coverage and plugging up the middle of the field.

The Lions have always had success when they've been able to establish the run early in games, as they did last week against Edmonton. That forced the Eskimos to put more players in the box and helped open up some passing lanes.

Other receivers also have to step up. Gore's absence was costly against Winnipeg. It is much easier to defend the middle of the field against Arceneaux and Burnham when the Lions don't have a legitimate third receiving threat. Sinkfield has shown flashes and can keep defences on their toes. He and Rainey have also done well at times to stretch the field horizontally, opening up room for the Lions' inside running game and the slotback passing game. Short crossers, dump passes, screen passes and QB scrambles can also keep defences off balance.

You can be sure that every team the Lions play from now to the end of the season will try to shut down Arceneaux and Burnham. Playoff games are often won when role players step up and make plays. That includes Rainey, Sinkfield, Iannuzzi and Lumbala. The Lions can't expect Arceneaux and Burnham to account for two-thirds of their passing attack in the playoffs, as good as they are. They need to spread the ball around and attack all of the field. Having a more balanced passing attack will minimize the need for Jennings to throw into double coverage to his two main targets.
Blitz
Team Captain
Posts: 9094
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 8:44 am

B.C.FAN wrote:
Blitz wrote:Here are a few questions for you B.C. Fan.

How do we avoid interceptions when our offence is a big play vertical offence that favors the deep and deep intermediate pass? How does Jennings not throw into double coverage when defences play us Man/Cover 2, so most deep intermediate or deep balls will involve double coverage - the man covering the receiver and the safety?

How does Jennings throw to his favorite receivers when most of the time Arseneaux and Burham are running deep intermediate routes or deeper by design. Sometimes we'll have a pass play where Manny runs a shorter route but usually when we need a critical second down only?

Its easy to say "Don't throw interceptions Jennings"! Even last game, while being more careful, Jennings threw into double coverage twice.

Good questions. One of Jennings' strengths is his accuracy. He can confidently drop the ball into tight windows against zone coverage. Many quarterbacks wouldn't attempt a lot of the throws he has made. Another strength is his chemistry with Arceneaux and Burnham. He can throw 50-50 jump balls and trust his receivers to come down with the ball or make sure the defender doesn't. Nothing has to change. Some of his interceptions are not his fault, of course. His biggest weakness, and the one he addressed last game with Wally's help, is his tendency to throw careless late interceptions. The deep ball to Gore on first down that was intercepted by Fogg to set up Winnipeg's tying touchdown in the recent game at B.C. Place was an example, along with the deep OT pass to Gore in the end zone in Calgary that clinched the Stamps' victory, when a chip-shot field goal would have tied the game and forced a second OT. Lately Wally has been preaching the importance of ball security and playing smart. The entire team has bought in. Turnovers are not all on the QB. Everyone needs to do their part.
Blitz wrote:A second question B.C. Fan? How do you explain all the big plays our defence gives up? We're in Cover 2 or Cover 3 most of the time? That is supposed to minimize big plays.
Our secondary isn't breaking to the ball. Even when they're in position, they seem to give up deep completions instead of knocking the ball down or making interceptions. The lack of interceptions by the secondary is a key sign that the players aren't good enough or aggressive enough. The Lions have settled on Edem as their safety. He makes big hits, and had his first two interceptions in the second Winnipeg game, but for my money Eric Fraser got to the ball faster and broke up more deep balls than Edem when he was the starter. Ryan Phillips is a great veteran who can read patterns and break up short passes but he has been a liability on deep balls and has been targeted by some opponents, notably Ottawa and Calgary. Brandon Stewart, as you have noted, has often struggled at field corner. The Lions have used Thompson, Purifoy and Bighill as safeties in their Cover 2 or Cover 3 defences. I thought Thompson was the most effective of the three in defending against deep balls early in the season but he seldom sees the field any more. Bighill should not be used as a safety.
Blitz wrote:Thirdly, if turnovers are so important (and I think they're important too or I wouldn't have been *beeotch* so much prior to Jennings interceptions against Winnipeg about us throwing into double coverage so much) why do we have the same record as Winnipeg and the third best record in the CFL when Winnipeg has such a positive turnover differential and our Leos are minus 7 in takeaways and giveaways?
That's easy. Winnipeg lives off turnovers. Turnovers are the reason they are 10-6. The Bombers have scored 146 points off turnovers and given up 49. Almost one-third of their scoring has come from turnovers. The Lions are 10-6 despite their minus-7 turnover ratio. They might be 14-2 or 15-1 if not for the careless late turnovers they've made.

In the first B.C.-Winnipeg game, the Bombers scored 10 points off turnovers and forced a turnover on downs in the final minute inside the Winnipeg 5 yard line. They won by two points.

In the second B.C.-Winnipeg game, the Bombers scored 16 points off six B.C. turnovers, including two late turnovers when the Lions just needed to protect a fourth-quarter lead. The Bombers won by three points.

B.C.'s offence outgained the Bombers by more than 200 yards in the two games combined. Turnovers determined the outcome of both games, as they have many other games for both teams.
Blitz wrote:And finally what do you think happened that caused our offence (or say Jennings) to throw so many interceptions against Edmonton and Winnipeg, when he had only thrown 7 interceptions in his first 12 games? Jennings gained more experience as the season progressed. How do you account for the change? In other words, what do you think was the cause?
As you've documented, the Bombers and Eskimos both played a lot of Cover-2 zone or Cover-2 with man underneath to shut down Burnham and Arceneaux in particular. Great players will still make plays but the Lions need others to step up and make plays when defences are dropping eight or nine people into coverage and plugging up the middle of the field.

The Lions have always had success when they've been able to establish the run early in games, as they did last week against Edmonton. That forced the Eskimos to put more players in the box and helped open up some passing lanes.

Other receivers also have to step up. Gore's absence was costly against Winnipeg. It is much easier to defend the middle of the field against Arceneaux and Burnham when the Lions don't have a legitimate third receiving threat. Sinkfield has shown flashes and can keep defences on their toes. He and Rainey have also done well at times to stretch the field horizontally, opening up room for the Lions' inside running game and the slotback passing game. Short crossers, dump passes, screen passes and QB scrambles can also keep defences off balance.

You can be sure that every team the Lions play from now to the end of the season will try to shut down Arceneaux and Burnham. Playoff games are often won when role players step up and make plays. That includes Rainey, Sinkfield, Iannuzzi and Lumbala. The Lions can't expect Arceneaux and Burnham to account for two-thirds of theirpassing attack in the playoffs, as good as they are. They need to spread the ball around and attack all of the field. Having a more balanced passing attack will minimize the need for Jennings to throw into double coverage to his two main targets.
Great read B.C. Fan

I won't go over every point you made but I agree with almost all of them and thay provide great insight.

First of all, Wally is a hypocrite. For a good chunk of this season, Wally was encouraging of Jennings throwing into double coverage, because, as you noted, Jennings can throw into double coverage with such accuracy that it gives his receiver the best chance at the football or he knows on a 50/50 ball, Arseneaux or Burham will likely win the battle. Wally's public comments about Jennings attacking defenses for most of the season provide further evidence for my comment.

Of course it was all fine, when Jennings had only thrown 7 interceptions over those 12 games, while connecting on so many big plays. But when some of those attacking throws resulted in some interceptions against Winnipeg, then Wally comments that he had thought of pulling Jennings a couple of time and suddenly gets all concerned about ball security. He encouraged Jennings to make those throws all season, as did Khari Jones, until suddenly it wasn't working out for them and then suddenly its all Jennings fault.

In terms of late in the game interceptions, Buono and Khari should have been sending in high percentage plays into the game at that point especially, with a lead. That's what we did in our last win against Edmonton. Routes were shortened on pass plays etc. We didn't do that for Jennings in earlier games, with those situations.

Khari could have sent in dump off passes, motion screens, high percentage quick outs on the boundary side etc. in those earlier games against Edmonton, Winnipeg, and even Calgary, earlier in the season, as well as tell Jennings to throw it away or take a sack, when we had the lead late in those games.

Jennings is not an island to himself. He has coaches. He has Lulay. Where we they to guide Jennings late in those games? Its inexcusable for these so called leaders to let a virtual rookie take the heat, while they are more responsible that Jennings.

I agree with you that we need to throw more to Sinkfield, Gore, Iannuzzi when teams focus on Arseneaux and Burnham. But there is also a second solution. We don't always need to line up Arseneaux and Burnham in the inside slots. We don't have to have them run their patterns to the middle of the field, where they are easier to double cover. We can move Arseneaux to the boundary wide side receiver at times. We can mix things up. Last game, for the first time this season, when we were in two back set, we lined up Burnham at boundary wide side and Arseneaux at boundary slot (his usual spot)

But we put our two best receivers on one side. We could do the same in the five receiver set. We could line up Arseneaux and Burhham on the wide side together in the slots. Chap used to move Simon around to get him away from double coverage. So, while I agree that we need to diversity our attack (eg: in the first Winnipeg game, Burnham and Arseneaux accounted for 350 yds. of our passing offence - it was a two receiver show in that game) but we can also prevent defences from shutting down our two best receivers (Burnham had 48 yds. and Arseneaux had 16 yds. in the second Winnipeg game.

A combination of a more diversified passing attack to use our other receivers plus moving our receivers around more would be a two pronged approach of our offence, as defences play us Man/Cover 2 or Zone Cover 2.

I totally agree with you that successfully running the football is a key to being successful. Early in the season our run game was very good and teams had to play us Cover 1 to attempt to stop it. But when Calgary came out and played us Man/Cover 2 in the third game against us, and they shut us down, every CFL defensive coordinator saw that. In the first game against Edmonton, Benevedes, a zone devotee, surprised and came out with Man/Cover 2. Its the way that defenses are going to play us.

We should be able to run successfully against Man/Cover 2. It only gives a defence five defenders in the box. If we can do it successfully, it forces them out of Cover 2. In the second half of the game against Edmonton last weekend they started to put more defenders in the box on first down. That opened up our first down passing plays.

Cover 2 not only opens up the run. It opens up the tailback in the passing attack. It opens up the run for the quarterback, as we saw last game, with Jennings running for a 20 yard touchdown, with man defenders unable to even see him running, as they were chasing our receivers downfield. But it came off a semi- bootleg, which we need to do more. Last game, on the inside zone read, Jennings could have faked to Johnson and kept the ball and ran outside and there was no one out there to stop him.

Back to defence. Our defense was so much better with our different personnel packages than our more set defensive lineup now, with Bighill also running back to two deep safety or middle safety in 3 deep coverage.

I also agree with you that our weakness has been our wide side more than our boundary side, most of the time, even with the rookies playing there. I don't think Stewart is good enough. Phillips has been beaten deep a few times. We are not aggressive at all and I think that is more a defensive philosophy issue more than its a personell issue. We should be needing Jennings and Lulay to coach our safety Edem, after practice to teach him angles.

We were much better off at two deep safety, when Thompson played that spot and we were better at two deep safety when Fraser and Edem played those spots too. We blitzed more effectively too, When is the last time you saw a successful defensive halfback blitz?

Thanks for your post and responding to my questions B.C. Fan. Interesting stuff!!
"When I went to Catholic high school in Philadelphia, we just had one coach for football and basketball. He took all of us who turned out and had us run through a forest. The ones who ran into the trees were on the football team". (George Raveling)
Blitz
Team Captain
Posts: 9094
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 8:44 am

B.C. Fan, correctly points out the importance of not turning the football over, especially late in games, and the impact of doing so.

But games are not just lost in the late stages of a football game and there are other factors to winning and losing.

LOST POINTS DUE TO FIELD GOALS AND POTENTIAL FIELD GOALS

This season, Rene Paredes of Calgary has attempted 62 field goals and hit 55 of them. That's 165 points. Justin Medlock has attempted 63 field goals and hit 55 of them for 165 points. Chris Milo has attempted 58 field goals and hit 47 of them (141 points)

Due to Wally's penchant to punt or not trust Leone, our Leos have only attempted 49 field goals and hit 35 of them for 105 points. Had we attempted more field goals and Leone been more successful, we could have had an additional 60 points this season, approximately. That's a lot of points. We only gain 17 yards per game on average (and a few singles when Leone punts into the end zone but we lose field position due to that penchant)

Its been pointed out that we've lost some games due to late interceptions and turnovers this season. But we've also lost games due to field goal misses.

We lost to Calgary in overtime. In that game, Leone missed a field goal that was returned 48 yards by Calgary's Roy Finch. Calgary scored on its next play. That was a 10 point difference in a game that ended up tied in regulation time.

We lost to Edmonton in Edmonton. In that game, Leone missed a field goal. At the end of that game, instead of Jennings attempting to throw a ball into the end zone, from our 43 yard line (that was intercepted) we could have been attempting a 49 yard field goal for the win.

When we lost to the Bombers in Winnipeg, we wouldn't have even needed to be gambling on third and one at the end of that game (Rainey was stopped) if Leone had not missed a 43 yard field goal earlier in that game. Instead, we would have been hitting a chip shot field goal at the end of that game, for the win.

When we played the Bombers at home and lost, while Medlock hit 7/7 field goals, Leone missed a 30 yarder earlier in that game.(almost automatic for CFL field goal kickers this season). Even with our turnovers at the end of that game, had Leone hit a very makeable field goal, the game would have been tied at the end of regulation time.

Field goal kicking has hurt our team this season and that doesn't even count the ones we should have attempted and didn't because Wally chose to punt instead,

LOST POINTS DUE TO NOT GAMBLING ON THIRD AND ONE

I have already pointed out that we scored a field goal and a touchdown against Edmonton (10 points) last weekend, after gambling on third and short twice in that game. We won the game by 7 points, so those third down gambles were important to the outcome.

But we've lost games or at least likely lost games due to Wally refusing to gamble on third and one. (I won't even go into the times we were stopped in Winnipeg for little or no gain in Winnipeg).

For example, when we lost to Edmonton, in Edmonton, by 4 points, Wally turned down a 3rd and 1, inside Edmonton territory.

In the first Winnipeg game, Wally turned down a third and 1, on the Bombers 6 yd. line in the second quarter of that game.

In the last game against Winnipeg, Wally turned down a 3rd and 1 on the Bombers 44 yard line and punted instead, rather than gambling or going for the field goal. When the punt was over, we'd only netted 17 yards of field position. Wally also kicked a 14 yard field goal on second and 2 from the Bomber 6 yard line, after we got 0 yards on second and 2 (can't fault Wally for taking the points on that one).

Third and one is not a high risk gamble. In fact its a very high percentage play for all CFL teams, including our Leos. Unless deep in your own territory or needing points towards the end of a game, its wise to go for it on 3rd and 1. Its lower percentage football to not go for it. Its not conservative to kick a field goal, on third and one, inside the oppositions 5 yard line. Its dum. An offence only gets very limited chances to be that deep inside enemy territory to score touchdowns.

Having two cracks on the opposition's four yard line to score a touchdown, after a successful high percentage third and one gamble, is smart football. The defensive line is one yard off the football. It should almost be automatic with good offensive line play and it usually is.

WRAP

A lot of attention has been placed on lost games this season due to late game turnovers. But that is simplistic. We've lost games this season due to makeable field goals that have been missed earlier, changing the situation late in games. Wally has also turned down third and one opportunities that likely would have led to scores, as it did last game against Edmonton.

Our running game, on our losses to Edmonton and both losses to Winnipeg also hurt us badly. There were numerous times we had second and 2 and either lost yards, were stopped for no gain, or only gained a yard. Convert those and Wally would not have been placed in his fearful position of not going for it on third and 1.

Yes, turnovers matter, but there have been lots of reasons why, offensively, we lost some games this season that we should have won. Games are decided by many factors besides late game turnovers. I won't even get into our defense because right now, Mark Washington is trying to figure out how he can use Bazzie as a deep safety. :wink:
"When I went to Catholic high school in Philadelphia, we just had one coach for football and basketball. He took all of us who turned out and had us run through a forest. The ones who ran into the trees were on the football team". (George Raveling)
Blitz
Team Captain
Posts: 9094
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 8:44 am

Just reading an article on cfl.ca about Jonathan Jennings. Won't post the whole thing but here is an excerpt.


Jennings is a different breed when it comes to arm strength and accuracy.

Even I could fake a hand off, bootleg and find a late releasing fullback in the flats. That’s day one quarterback stuff. If you can’t do that you shouldn’t be in the league.

What Jennings does goes far beyond that. His youth and mobility is perfectly complemented by his cannon of a shoulder and perhaps most importantly his ability to quickly process defences and anticipate — a rare trait in a wide eyed CFL pivot.

There’s been no sophomore slump for Jonathon Jennings in his second season

Multiple times this season Jennings has made throws with a velocity and accuracy which made me rewind to make sure there wasn’t a gas leak in the house causing hallucinations.

Every time I rewound the throw all I could do was shake my head. Simply put he is special.

In the CFL, we have a bad habit of looking for the next tweener or niche player in the college ranks who will turn out to be Warren Moon or Doug Flutie. Many looked at Vernon Adams Jr. after he went undated in the NFL this past spring and thought he was the purrfect CFL quarterback due to his athleticism and scrambling ability.

Jim Popp agreed and traded BC a first round pick for the right to watch Adams watch everyone else play until recently.

The CFL game requires more than psychotic randomness and quick feet to play quarterback. The game requires a certain level of athletic prowess, yes, but that skill-set can only be put on display when combined with an above average football IQ, an accurate hand and a willingness to wait for the purrfect situation.

I believe Jonathon Jennings found his quicker than even he imagined and now we all get to sit back and enjoy
"When I went to Catholic high school in Philadelphia, we just had one coach for football and basketball. He took all of us who turned out and had us run through a forest. The ones who ran into the trees were on the football team". (George Raveling)
Blitz
Team Captain
Posts: 9094
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 8:44 am

As we prepare for the Riders and mourn the passing of Vic Rapp, I asked myself , as a Leos supporter, am I being too critical? Yes, I am but there is a reason why I feel this way.

Being a long time Leo fan, I know that you only get limited chances to get to the Big Dance. I've seen too many excellent quarterbacks get hurt here, even in more recent years. We saw Dickenson leave the game with a concussion, after being out of action here for long stretches due to injuries. There was Printers rotator cuff injury in 2005 and his knee reconstruction injury in 2010 (which is unbelievable that he played with it from the first game of the 2010 season). We saw Pierce injured often and Lulay's career struggle after only two full seasons as a starter.

So when a special Jonathan Jennings comes along, you can't always count on him not getting injured in the future. Then there is Manny and Burnham - both are tremendous talents and you don't often have two receivers of this quality season after season. And of course, there is the 'Rain Man' Chris Rainey and his tremendous ability on our return teams and also on offence.

On defence we have Team 100, two linebackers that will be remembered for a long time after their playing days are over.

So, in these ways, and perhaps others, this is a special team.

The problem is that Calgary is so dam good this year. Hufnagel is so bright and so still involved. Dickenson has done an excellent job as a first year HC. Bo Levi Mitchell has thrown 32 touchdown passes this season and will win the MOP.

No one is talking much about Jerome Messam, but he only leads the league in rushing but he already has 1,162 yards rushing to lead the CFL and he is far ahead of any other running back. Messam also has 477 yards in receiving, making him a double threat.

When everyone was looking for quicker, smaller tailbacks, Hufnagel traded for Messam, a 250 pound plus tailback and showed how astute he is...plus Messam is a National too. Calgary is not worried about playing a National tailback. Messam has more yards than our two tailbacks and a lot more reception yards too.

Calgary has started 10 different offensive lineman due to injuries this season and they have protected Bo Levi for only 18 sacks this season, 11 fewer sacks than the next best team. They also open up big holes for Messam at times.

Calgary distributes the football to all its receivers. And when Joe West gets injured they start rookie DaVaris Daniels and he comes in and is impressive. Calgary also rotates in its Canadian receivers. They don't sit then on the bench like we do with Adekolu. They develop them.

Calgary leads the CFL in total points scored and most offensive categories.

Dickenson was upset and worried when Stubler left. But Claybrooks, in his first season as DC, has his defense giving up the least points, leading the CFL in sacks and pass knockdowns. They have the best run defence in the CFL, give up the least pass yards per pass and the least average yards per game.

And they've done that while not only making personell changes to their defense but also have inserted their first round draft choice this season (6th) as their National starting middle linebacker. No way that would have ever happened with Wally. Singleton would be playing special teams only until he cried.

The Stamps are doing it with a rookie defensive end, a first year National at middle linebacker, discarded Leo Zach Minter at defensive tackle, rookie corner Tommie Campbell, and second year corner Shiante Evens (5'11", 170 pounds).

The Stamps could go 16-1- this season. They are formidable. They are very well managed (Hufnagel - who also scouts and helps with game planning, well coached (Dickenson, Claybrooks, DelManaco) and their players are disciplined.

But there is one team that is capable of beating them. We beat them in the first game of the season and we lost to them in overtime in Calgary, a game that we blew after leading by a big margin for most of the game.

We have the talent to beat them. We proved that earlier in the season. The question is whether our coaches are smart enough to beat them. Obviously, by the third time we played Calgary and were dominated at home, Calgary's superior coaching had come to the fore.

But if we can make the right adjustments to our schemes, this Leos team could do it. But you only get so many seasons to have that shot.

We had the talent from 2003-2007 but lost too often in the playoffs, with our one Grey Cup win. We didn't from 2008-2010. We did again in 2011 and 2012 and then there were three seasons in which our chances were diminished.

B.C. Fan points out that we could easily be 14-2 right now. I prefer 15-1. We really should not have lost to the Argos at home. The only game that we really should have lost was the home game where Calgary outplayed us on both sides of the football.

Turnovers, bad play calling, not being able to covert on second and two, late game mishaps, some scheme issues are the things that have held us back. This is a very good team with some real star players.

I would love to see this Leo team play in at least a Division Final. They really are good enough to beat Calgary, even if being slight underdogs.

We've got two games to prepare to be a playoff tough opponent to beat. We have the second highest scoring offence and we are more explosive than Calgary. Our defense is 4th in the CFL but leads some categories. We are close. We are better than every other team than Calgary.

But Calgary is beatable. If only we make the right adjustments (and that's not running Bazzie back to join Bighill at safety. :wink:

These Leo players have played their hearts out this season. I would love to see them get the opportunity to do something special.
"When I went to Catholic high school in Philadelphia, we just had one coach for football and basketball. He took all of us who turned out and had us run through a forest. The ones who ran into the trees were on the football team". (George Raveling)
Blitz
Team Captain
Posts: 9094
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 8:44 am

Excellent feel good story on Jason Aragki getting an opportunity to play some defense for our Leos. Aragki is our all-time downfield tackle leader on special teams, he's our special teams captain, and he is a Leo veteran.

I'm happy for Aragki... but ......but.....

I have to say this move surprises me. Aragki is undersized at 220 pounds as a linebacker. He's not the athlete that Bo Lokombo is. In fact I have been surprised that we were not playing Lokombo more often, before Wally put Aragki in at weakside linebacker on our run defense.

Calgary gets rid of their top free agent signing to put a National rookie in at middle linebacker and we take a young linebacker with outstanding talent and pine him for a special teams vet. Something doesn't make sense to me.

Not too much 'carrot' needed in Calgary, like here, referring to Washington's brilliant 'carrot' approach (read below)

Comments from Tedford last year:
“Our confidence has never waivered in him,” said head coach Jeff Tedford. “It seems like every time he’s in, he makes plays.”
Comment from Mark Washington last year
“You want to put the carrot out there so they can chase it but at the same time, these things are earned, they’re not given,” said Washington.“And he’s earned the fact that he’s getting some playing time.”
Why now, after 8 years of watching Aragki practice at linebacker (and he's had some opportunities to play linebacker in the past).

One of the most amazing plays of this season was watching Lokombo vertically leap over a huge lineman to tackle a quarterback. Lokombo has hardly seen the field since the Montreal game.

Lokombo lead the CFL draft rankings in two of the three put out in Lokombo's CFL draft year. We only got him so low because CFL teams shied away from him, anticipating that Lokombo would be a NFL draft pick or make it down there as a free agent. That was due to Lokombo's mix of power, instincts and incredible speed.

Lokombo had a great training camp and it was expected that he would play more this season than previously. So how did we get from this
Lions ready to unleash linebacker Bo Lokombo in 2016

SURREY, B.C. — Mark Washington looked over at Bo Lokombo after one of the B.C. Lions’ mini-camp sessions last week and marvelled.
After two seasons spent learning the system and contributing on special teams, the club’s defensive co-ordinator declared it was time to unleash the 25-year-old on the rest of the CFL.

"Bo’s a very talented young man," said Washington. "It’s time to let him loose."

The Lions knew they had an impressive physical specimen when they drafted the University of Oregon linebacker in 2013, but it wasn’t clear where he fit in three-down football when he finally joined the club partway through the following season.

A chiselled six foot two and 233 pounds, was he better suited as a linebacker or as a safety?

Heading into a third CFL campaign, Washington made it clear where he expects Lokombo to line up in 2016.

"He's a linebacker," Washington said, before repeating himself: "He's a linebacker. I mean, look at him."

Lokombo -- who was born in Congo, but moved with his family in 1996 to Montreal and then eventually Abbotsford, B.C. -- led the CFL in special teams tackles last season, and said he's confident he can handle more responsibilities on defence after spot duty the last two years.

"They want to get a role for me," said the soft-spoken Lokombo. "We have Solomon (Elimimian) and (Adam) Bighill, two great all-stars. They want me to come in here and help contribute to the team."

Lions head coach and general manager Wally Buono, back on the sidelines this season for the first time since 2011, is eager to see what Lokombo can do.

"His role last year was more significant," said Buono. "When you look at his production, it's warranted looking at getting him more involved. He's a tremendous athlete.

"When he played on defence he made plays for us."

But as with most young players, the learning curve from college to the pros can be steep. The Lions are confident Lokombo is ready to take the next step where he simply reacts on the field without having to think.

"We had a firm idea of what he was, but until you see it on the field you don't know," said Washington. "More importantly, he needed to figure out what he wanted to do here on the field and get used to the CFL game.

"He's starting to catch up to speed now."

Lokombo didn't have to show up to the Lions' two-day mini-camp for mostly first- and second-year players, but the club was glad to have him there soaking up as much information as possible.

"We definitely want to expand his role," said Buono. "When you look at the athlete and you look at the fact he helps you with the ratio, there's lots to be excited about."
Its not always predictable in Wally's World.
Ed Willes: Lions' Jason Arakgi great in the grind, seizes opportunity on 'D'

Jason Arakgi thinks of himself as a grinder and, during the course of a conversation, he’ll reinforce that point with the regularity of the postman.

He says: “Working hard is very important to me.”

He says he takes pride in his job but everyone should, “whether they’re making $50,000 a year or $1 million.”
And when asked about what motivates him, he offers this old chestnut: “It comes from within. You should never let other people tell you what you can or can’t do.”

Still, as Solomon Elimimian, his teammate and charter member of the Arakgi fan club, points out, everyone says those things; not everyone lives them and with Arakgi, you just have to look at his nine years with the B.C. Lions to understand his words have meaning.

“He’s the ultimate team guy,” says Elimimian. “He’s always kept his head down and worked. A lot of guys say it but he really has done whatever it takes to help the team.

“I’m happy he’s got a chance and you can tell he’s not going to let go of it. When he comes in I say, ‘Arakgi, you’ve got to slow down, man. You’re taking my tackles.’ But it’s great. He’s been waiting for this opportunity for for nine years.”

And he’s never stopped grinding.

In a sport that prizes perseverance and dedication as its core principles, it’s taken the Lions a while to reward the linebacker’s body of work. He spent his career in servitude on the special teams, plying his trade with such singular determination that he set the CFL record for career special teams’ tackles. This season, at age 31, he finally received his big break when he was given a regular role in the Lions’ defence, where he’s excelled.

Along the way he’s battled preconceptions about his abilities. At 6-foot-2 and 220 pounds he’s undersized for a linebacker. As a third-round draft pick from McMaster University, he wasn’t exactly the first choice to play an import position.

But after watching Arakgi bust a spleen on special teams for over eight years, head coach Wally Buono finally relented midway through this season and installed the Torontonian as the weak-side linebacker in run defence with the clear understanding he was on a short leash.

Jason Arakgi clowns around, doing his best dance steps on photo day for the B.C. Lions at their Surrey training facility in September 2012.

Now?

“He’s done a good job,” Buono says.

“Look, I love Jason,” Buono continues. “But we’re not in the fair business. What do I care if a guy’s been here nine or 10 years. He’s paid very well to cover kicks (the one concession the Lions have made, Arakgi is paid like a starter). But he doesn’t have entitlement to an opportunity.

“We were giving other people opportunities we felt had more upside. We felt it was time to give Jason that opportunity.”

Funny, Arakgi feels the same way. Actually, he’s felt that way since he was drafted by the Lions in 2008. To give you an idea of how long he’s been with the organization, the only player who’s more senior is defensive back Ryan Phillips. Arakgi has also played against three men who are currently coaches in the CFL: Dave Dickenson, Jason Maas and Mike O’Shea.

“If you ask me I was ready,” says the married father of two. “If you ask them, it took me nine years to be ready.”

But while it took its sweet time presenting itself, Arakgi has made the most of his opportunity. In last weekend’s win over Edmonton, he contributed a couple of tackles on defence as the Lions held the Esks to 86 rushing yards, then authored the key play of the game when he forced a fourth-quarter fumble by Eskimos return man Troy Stoudermire.

“I fit all the stereotypes for a special teamer but that’s what keeps me going,” Arakgi says. “I don’t want to say it was a chip on my shoulder but it was. I’m not a quitter.”

That much seems to be encoded in his DNA. Arakgi’s father, Nick, was an all-Canadian tight end who was a teammate of Buono’s with the Alouettes. His brother Nick is a major in the Canadian army. His sister Michelle is an orthopaedic surgeon.

As for the special teams’ record that he set earlier this season, Arakgi sounds a little like Crash Davis, the hero of Bull Durham who didn’t want to be acknowledged for breaking the minor-league home-run record.

“I’m very proud of my record but I don’t think anyone tries to break a record for the best backup,” he says. “It was never my goal. There was a little of me that wanted it to be quiet, just get it and get it over with.”

And get back to the grind.
"When I went to Catholic high school in Philadelphia, we just had one coach for football and basketball. He took all of us who turned out and had us run through a forest. The ones who ran into the trees were on the football team". (George Raveling)
User avatar
B.C.FAN
Team Captain
Posts: 12590
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 10:28 pm

The Lions are going with the same lineup that beat Edmonton last week. Jeremiah Johnson gets his third straight start at running back. David Menard again starts on the D-line, rotating with Maxx Forde. Jabar Westerman has been added from the 1-game injured list in place of Darius Allen, who returns to the practice roster, but Westerman is not expected to dress.

Depth chart and roster vs. Riders
Lionsfan65
Starter
Posts: 135
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2016 9:12 am

Should be a good game, the Riders are a better team then the one we beat early in the season. With the passing of Vic Rapp, and being the final game at Taylor Field, it should be an emotional game for both sides.
Post Reply