Leos at Home to the Eskimos

The Place for BC Lion Discussion. A forum for Lions fans to talk and chat about our team.
Discussion, News, Information and Speculation regarding the BC Lions and the CFL.
Prowl, Growl and Roar!

Moderator: Team Captains

Blitz
Team Captain
Posts: 9094
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 8:44 am

I'm wriitng this thread earlier than usual. Our Leos need some extra prepartion after two tough losses to the Bombers and losing their second place position in the West standings. Lionbackers also need some extra time for preparation too. :wink:

Sometimes the football gods decide to give some of the most talented and dedicated players a few tests of adversity, when things have been going too much their way. The football gods want them to know that life can't always be easy or smooth or the important lessons won't be learned along the way. Adversity also keeps them humble and grounded. It makes them even better, forging them into steel, if they can take it.

Those football gods have tested Jennings. They want him to learn that you can't always defy the odds and not pay a price and that you can't always lead your team to a last minute game winning drive. They want you to know that throwing for over 422 yards in a game, with stunning throw after throw, doesn't always lead to victory. They also want you to clearly understand that Interceptions can hurt. The football gods want that lesson engrained because it wasn't. The football gods know as a young quarterback, you have achieved impressive early success in your pro career. They know that you will be a much better quarterback, in the long run, if you can learn from adversity, as well as success.

Those same football gods want you, Chris Rainey, to know, that even with your incredible talent you are not always going to be the hero. No matter how many exceptional returns you make or how many big plays you contribute on offence, life isn't always going to go your way. Its not easy to contribute over 250 yards to your team in a game, also be your team's leading rusher in that game as a rotational tail back, and then have all those tremendous plays be thrust into the background as you're criticized for being stopped on a third and one.

Instead of giving you a deserved break, the football gods also test you again. Instead of rewarding you for blowing by a defender for a pass reception touchdown or juking defenders out of their cleats on a kick return, that appears like its going to be a game winning touchdown, the unpredictable can happen. Lumbala appears out of nowhere and his helmet knocks the football out of your hands. The football gods want you to know that life can be arbitrary and unfair.

The football gods also want to test you, Bryan Burnham and Manny Arseneaux. Both of you had mind blowing games in Winnipeg. Bryan Burnham, you're 200 yd. plus receiving game had not been accomplished since the great Geroy Simon did it in 2007. The football gods put you in that vulnerable position, to allow Loffler that powerful hit on you, causing you to fumble, to remind you, once again, that you got to where you are through hard work/dedicated effort and that success can be fleeting. They wanted to emphasize that when you are on the mountain top, you can forget that there'll always be valleys in life.

Manny, you had over 150 yards of receiving in Winnipeg and made incredible catch after catch too. This last game, with only 2 receptions for 16 yards, was a way for the football gods to reinforce how badly the opposition hates the 'Manny Show' and what they're willing to do and will be willing to do in the future, to put it off the air. The football gods wanted you to realize how much harder you'll have to work to get open in the future. They want you to run your routes even sharper. They want you to realize that there will always be envious people in life who will do anything to thwart your success.

Even more so, the football gods wanted you, Wally Buono, to know that being a legend, even in your own words, doesn't guarantee future success. You were having a very good season turning this team around. You were enjoying the praise and basking in the accolades of your return to the sidelines.. Your young quarterback was leading your team to last minute game winning drives. Life was good. A home playoff game was on the horizon. The football gods wanted to give you a message that the world is changing at an ever increasing rate these days. Past success doesn't guarantee future success. Same old' can mean going backwards. The lesson of evolution is that those who adapt win. The wise adapt even more quickly these days.

The football gods have recently reminded our Leos that success and happiness is not the 'absence of adversity'. It's the ability to deal with adversity and come out the other end wiser. The fooball gods have hopefully taken a rest now, as our Leos prepare for the Eskimos.

I'm not going to focus this week on the opposition - the Edmonton Eskimos. Lately we've been beating ourselves so I'm just mostly just going to write about us.

The Eskmioms run a combination West Coast/Spread offence. They will often line their receivers up as tight ends and throw off that formation. They have Reilly, Bowman and Walker as their main threats. They ran a lot against us last game. John White is a quality back. Mark Washington will figure it out or not.

Defensively, Mike Benevedes likes to rush four and play zone defence. Their defense is not overly complicated but its improved a lot lately. Khari Jones needs a better game plan against it than the last time we played them.

Our Lions are 1-5 this season against Calgary, Edmonton and Winnipeg — our main rivals in the West. They all have more than enough talent that we can't afford to be outcoached, as we have been previously, against these teams. If we want to beat Edmonton, we need our coaching staff to step up and we need our players to not turn the football over, to tackle well, and to get some increased pressure on the quarterback.

We also need to play well in the fourth quarter. We've won four close games this season with game winning drives. We're 6-0 this season when wev'e outscored the oppisition in the fourth quarter. We're 0-6 when we've scored less points that the opposition in the fourth quarter. Our six losses this season all were due to being outscored in the fourth quarter.

Lets have a closer look at this upcoming game, with a focus on Leos.

OFFENCE

1. Offensive Turnovers

Our offence has put up some impressive passing numbers over the last few weeks but turnovers have really hurt our offence. We threw four interceptions last game and had two lost fumbles. Jennings threw two interceptions in his previous game. If we want to get things turned around, we have to do a much better job in this area. The interceptions are not all on Jennings. Many factors are a part of the equation, from scheme, the encouragment of throwing into double coverage and making plays, lack of short outlets, Jennings being hit while throwing, deflected passes off a receivers hands, etc.. We need to start playing more sound, balanced offensive football.

2. Our Running Game

Our early season success came not only from our passing game but also from our running game. Anthony Allen averaged 2.5 yds per carry in his last game in Winnipeg. Rainey was our leading rusher in that game. Jeremiah Johnson averaged 3.9 yds. per carry last game with the average fattened by one longer run. The introduction of the jet sweep to Sinkfield netted 21 yards on his one carry.

Khari Jones/Dorazio introduced a number of new running plays agaisnt the Bombers and there was improvement but we're having our usual mid to later in the season problems with our running attack. We need to continue to adapt our running game but more importantly, we need to scheme it better, in terms of blocking scheme.

3. The Sinkfield Factor

We now have all the tools in our arsenal, in terms of talent for our passing attack. Burnham and Arseneaux are two of the best reeivers in the league. Shawn Gore's return from concussion gives us another quality option. Gore had a 30 yd. touchdown pass against Winnipeg. Chris Rainey is another dangerous threat when he rotates into the game.

Sinkfield was our leading receiver against the Bombers last game. He also had a 21 yard run and was being used for kickoff returns - a wise move that can pay dividends.After a few struggles, Sinkfield is now starting to look much more comfortable in our offence.

We have an abundance of offensive weapons. There is no need to throw into double coverage on intermediate routes in the future. A deep ball is different. If a team wants to double cover Manny or Burhham, we have two other excellent options in Sinkfield and Gore as well as Rainey when he is in the game.

4. Use of our Tailback/Fullback in the Passing Attack.

We're tipping off every time we want to throw the swing pass to our taiback in the flat and that is why the play is being unsuccessful, even to the speedy Rainey. We need to chip with the tailback and then send him on the swing pass to the flat. We need to integrate Johnson and Allen better into our passing attack. A play action pass and then hitting the tailback in the open area vacated by the linebacker is the way to do it. Harris lived off that play here and is still liviing off it in Winnipeg.

The tailback screen is a good play that we need to use. The misdirection, throw back fullback screen pass to Lumbala would be a great option, especiallly with Rainey in the game. Khari did use Rainey on a fake swing pass with Jennings hitting the slant pattern last game. It was another new addition of a play that showed good sense.

5. Moving our Recievers Around More

One thing Chap did really well was move our receivers around. He did that, mostly, to get Simon away from double coverage. By sliding Gore inside and Arseneaux outside occasionally on some pass plays we can get favorable matchups and avoid Arseneax getting triple coveage with a linebacker, defensive back and safety. On the wide side, in the five receiver set, it would make sense at times to shift Sinfied inside to use him on a short crossing route to utilize his speed, as well as mix things up.

The notion of using Adekolu for some rotational resps would also be wise. On pass plays like second and shorter, shifting the big target of Adekolu, who has great hands, inside for a possession type route would make a lot of sense, giving Jennings another very good option for that type of play. Burnham could shift to outside slot, while Sinkfield moves outside and clears the area with his speed. Of couse that will never happen.

Jones used a lot more motion last game and it's something he should also continue against Edmonton's defense, which is prone to motion.

DEFENCE

Where does one start? We can't keep playing the same defensive style and expecting a different result.

1. Take Away the Opposition's Strengths.

You can't play the Eskimos offence straight up. A lesson should be learned from how often Harris hurt us in the Bombers series. Bowman and Walker need to encounter a defense that double covers them, in one way or another. We also need to focus on White and Reilly running the football. That means we dont' take Bighill out of the mix by playing him as a deep safety.

Mark Washingtoin, If you don't understand how to shut down a couple of big play receivers look at the game tape of how the Bombers too away Burnham and Arseneaux last game. Copy it. We're not looking for original ideas. Just get it done.

2. Defensive Pass Rush.

We need to look at how we are using our personnel. Darius Allen is giving us nothing. We need to give Menard more reps because he almost always creates pressure. We should dress Bryant Turner Jr. in place of Allen and rotate him into the defensive tackle position. Westerman is playing well but rotating Bryant Turner Jr. with Brooks makes sense, especiall against pocket passing style quarterbacks. It also will allow us to keep our interior of our line fresh agaisnt the running game. We really should be using Uko but its too late now.

3. Secondary Personnel

I have no idea what Mark Washignton is thinking from both a personnel perspective or a scheme perspective. First of all, playing two rookies who didn't even get into the lineup until mid-season or later, on the boudary side is highly questionable. We should have moved a very good cover guy in Phillips to the boundary side and Fenner to the wide side so both Gaitor and Fenner were playing beside a defensive back with experience.

But if Washington was hell bent on playing both rookies on the tough boundary side (shorter throws for a quarterback, no nickel back), then he should have left Gaitor at half back and inserted Fenner at corner for the following reasons: 1) if Yell returns before the end of the season, it would only mean one change 2) Gaitor was playing well at boundary halfback and it meant two changes 3) weakness at boundary halfback, using zone defence, gives us more big plays than corner. If Fenner did not work out at corner, he could insert Jeremy Harris.

So, what does Washington do now at this juncture of the season, being as what has been done is done. He should seriously consider starting Harris in place of Fenner. Fenner is strugling. Better to make the change now, with three games to go, so Harris could at least have some experience before the playoffs.

4. The Cover 2 and Cover 3 Approach

Using Bighill as one of our two Cover 2 safeties or our Cover 3 middle safety is not smart. Bighill is a very good cover linebacker but he is not a defensive back. We also need him as a linebacker to do the variety of things that are his strengths - covering the flat and hook areas, tackling tailbacks and running quarerbacks and blitzing. The Bombers expolited our flats, with screens and play action, using Harris, when Bighill was playing deep safety. Other teams will do the same.

If Washington feels the need to use a Cover 2 to give Fenner help, there are better ways. He has other options. The first is to use Purifoy there. The second is to take a lineman out of the game and insert Thompson there or Fraser. If he wants to rush four and use 7 defensive backs on a long passing down, he can take a linebacker out but it would be better to use three defensive lineman and blitz either Sol E. or Bighill to get the four man rush. So Washington can switch personell ( Harris for Fenner), or use a different strategy for Cover 2.

For a Cover 3, we have three National safeties sitting on the bench in Thompson, Parker, and Fraser. Pick two of them add play them beside Edem for a Cover 3 instead of dropping Bighill from his linebacker spot to middle deep safety. I would choose Thompson and Parker and leave Edem in the middle. This is not rocket science.

Another way is for Washington to completely change his strategy. Blitzing a couple of defenders can also provide less time for a receiver to get deep against Fenner. Or he could blitz Fenner. The Bighill approach is not the answer. It wan't last year either and we finally abondoned it. But if something doesn't work, why not use it again.

The Bombers mandate a probing, grasping defence, a reflection of head coach Mike O’Shea, who has his men attacking, rather than waiting for enemy mistakes to happen.
“O’Shea and Richie Hall (D-coordinator) are always stressing, ‘Strip the ball away, strip the ball away,’” said defensive end Jamaal Westerman. “When the defensive line brings pressure, and there’s a turnover, we feel we caused it. Quarterbacks don’t react well under pressure. And, when the ball is in the air, our DBs do a great job of attacking it.”Winnipeg leads the CFL with 28 interceptions, three times the number produced by the Lions. The Bombers’ number of forced turnovers — 54 — is also more than double B.C.’s total — 23."
I won't hold my breath in terms of the 'aggressive' approach Washington has said he would use in the past and this season too.
Words are easy, actions count.

Covering the Tailback

When the oppostion has a tailback that is highly utilized in the passing attack (eg: Messam, Harris) it doesn't make sense to have our linebackers helping out in the hook zone areas and leaving the flat open for the tailback.

To shut down a tailback who is an asset for the oppositions passing attack you either cover him man to man with a linebacker or one of your two linebackes attack him on the side the tailback runs his swing pattern. You have to give up something to get something. You give up inside help on short passes over the middle to take the tailback pass out of the game. We would not do neither against the Bombers and Harris had a field day.

Here is a simple fact for Washington. John White has caught 57 passes this season, only one pass less than Anfew Harris, who leads all CFL tailbacks in receviing. White is Edmonton's third leading receiver. We don't need Sol E. and Bighill helping out with the possession hook zones. Bowman and Walker don't run a lot of routes in there. We need to focus on covering White instead, with one linebacker, while spying Reilly with our other linebacker. Bighill doesn't have the speed to cover Bowman or Walker deep anyway, so don't use Bighilll as a safety.

SPECIAL TEAMS

What can one say about Rainey. He's special. A good thing is that we've inserted Sinkfield as the second return man instead of Shaq Murray Lawrence. If Sinkfield returns a kickoff or two, that can help keep Rainey more fresh for punt returns and offence.

What can one say about our kickoff coverage team? They are not special. We need to get this fixed. We might not be able to fix Leone's field goal kicking (praying to the football gods is the only hope) but this is one area that we can do something about.
Leone's punting is always a good thing. However, Wally having Leone punt on the opposition 44 yd. line in the first half of game, on third and less than one yard is not. Leone can hit from 50 yds. He is probably better from that range than inside of 35 yds. He kicked a 52 yarder last game while missing from 35 and 30, in our last two games. He is probably better from that range than inside of 35 yds.

I won't even mention kicking a field goal, on third and less than one, on the opposition's 5 hard line, early in a game as not being a good thing (or a good percentage thing either). Its not high percentage football. Its not even conservative. Its fearful.

WRAP

We're now a third place team in the West. There are only two good places to finish tin the standings - second place in the West, where we get a home playoff game or being the cross-over team. The outcome of this game will help determine the direction we should go in.

I predicted our Leos would finish 4th this season. I badly want to be wrong.

I believe in playing to win. It doesn't do any good to limp into the playoffs to avoid playing Calgary. We can't completely control the outcome of the standings anyway.

We just need to focus on playing good, smart, sound football against Edmonton. Let the football gods be with us!

Go Leos! :roar: :roar: :roar: :roar: :roar: :roar: :roar: :roar: :roar: :roar: :roar: :roar: :roar: :roar: :roar:
"When I went to Catholic high school in Philadelphia, we just had one coach for football and basketball. He took all of us who turned out and had us run through a forest. The ones who ran into the trees were on the football team". (George Raveling)
User avatar
DanoT
Hall of Famer
Posts: 4314
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 6:38 pm
Location: Victoria, B.C. in summer, Sun Peaks Resort in winter

Another great post, Blitz. I especially enjoyed the football gods part. :thup: :thup:
User avatar
WestCoastJoe
Hall of Famer
Posts: 17721
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 8:55 pm

Keep up the good work, Blitz. Very good detail. :thup:
John Madden's Team Policies: Be on time. Pay attention. Play like hell on game day.

Jimmy Johnson's Game Keys: Protect the ball. Make plays.

Walter Payton's Advice to Kids: Play hard. Play fair. Have fun.
User avatar
KnowItAll
Hall of Famer
Posts: 7458
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 6:32 pm
Location: Delta

by what names do the football gods go by??
Every day that passes is one you can't get back
Dusty
Champion
Posts: 555
Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 8:31 pm

I do not understand why we are playing Purifoy as a linebacker. Would it not be better to use Lokombo as a Linebacker and drop Purifoy back to DB? He had a lot more success as DB in the early part of the year and could help out the rookies... Just wondering...
Blitz
Team Captain
Posts: 9094
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 8:44 am

KnowItAll wrote:by what names do the football gods go by??
I don't believe they have names or if they do, they don't share them with mere mortals, but only with each other. Those who pray to God, only know God as God. Those who plead with the Football Gods for their team's victories only know them as the Football Gods.

There are people out there who believe in kharma. In football, kharma is really the football gods teaching lessons, rectifying injustice, or punishing those of dubious character.

I only met them once, in a dream. It was when I was much younger, after playing in a football game. They visited the night after I had intercepted a football and had ran it back 43 yards at that point, and thought I was going to score. I relaxed and slowed down just a little and a huge fullback, out of my line of vision, hit me from behind and so hard, that I don't remember anything until the smelling salts woke me up. I was told I was unconscious on the opposition's four yard line and the football had flown out of my hands and landed out of bounds.

The next thing I remember was experiencing powerful nausea on the sidelines, while my defensive coach yelled at me for slowing down and not protecting the football. I was diagnosed with a concussion and had to be woken up every hour. In a dream, the football gods were sitting together on a cloud. They shared a life lesson with me. They told me you should never relax too much in life because there is always going to be someone out to get you and usually those types of people only get you from behind or when you are not looking for them, or when you don't suspect them. They told me that evil intent usually arrives sneakily.

I sense a hidden agenda in your question but hopefully it was just a straight forward question. The thread was just written in the way that it was.... in an attempt to write the pre-game analysis a little differently in an attempt to make it a little more interesting.

The football gods, I have been told, not only judge the character of football players and coaches. They also judge football fans too. :wink:

I'm a huge Seattle and New England fan. I really admire Bill Bellichick for his football mind. He's a football genius IMO and has the greatest football mind of any coach ever. But he will also do anything to win. He's not ethical. Its a weakness of his character.
When the Patriots played in SuperBowl XL11, they were undefeated in that season prior to that game, having won 18 games.

They were caught illicitly videotaping their opponents’ signals in the first week of that season, fined, and penalized a draft choice. But those decisions did not affect their season of play. They were on the way to winning the Super Bowl, capping off a purrfect season but their cheating would not have made them fitting champions.

It was left to the football gods to intervene because no one else would or could. The football gods send down a magic wand to David Tyree and he caught a game winning pass with his helmet on what should have been an impossible play. Cheaters should not prosper. Justice was served.

It looked as if the Seattle Seahawks were on their way to their second SuperBowl victory in a row but Instead of handing the ball off a second straight play to Marshawn Lynch, Pete Carroll decided to pass. "The Play" as it is now known as or "The Play Call" as it was known as then, was heavily questioned. The Seahawks were a swaggering team that season, players constantly talking about how great their team was, and running up scores in the fourth quarter. The football gods gave the Seahawks a lesson in humility.

The football gods concept can be an allegory, like the Vinegar tasters allegory. Three men are dipping their fingers in a vat of vinegar and tasting it. Each man's expression represents the predominant attitude of his philosophy of life..The first reacts with a sour expression, the second reacts with a bitter expression, and the third reacts with a sweet expression.

The reasons for the different expressions, while tasting the same thing are because the first sees life as mostly sour, the present out of step with the past. He was a rigid man and a rigid thinker, and a prescriptive man who believed that you just 'execute' what was done in the past better. :wink: The second one sees life mostly as bitter and his view of the world is that it's a setter of traps and filled with illustions. He's a negative man, filled with resentment.

The third man experiences the vinegar as sweet tasting. He believes in living his life by the virtues and sees life as mostly good as well as a teacher of lessons, leading to wisdom.

Getting back to our B.C. Lions, I'm guessing that the football gods believed our Leos were tempting fate once too often by throwing into double coverage way too often and always expecting a very positive result. They may also have believed that you don't win in life by also being too fearful, as our Leos punted or kicked field goals rather than go for it on third and one too ofen earlier in games.

I think the football gods felt our Leos were not showing balance - taking unnecessary risk at times and then at other times, not being wise enough to know that there are some good risks they should be taking in order to reap the reward of success. We were almost schizophrenic.

Its time for our Leos to return to balance. The football gods always believe in balance, as the secret to life, as well as football success, I am told.
"When I went to Catholic high school in Philadelphia, we just had one coach for football and basketball. He took all of us who turned out and had us run through a forest. The ones who ran into the trees were on the football team". (George Raveling)
User avatar
DanoT
Hall of Famer
Posts: 4314
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 6:38 pm
Location: Victoria, B.C. in summer, Sun Peaks Resort in winter

Dusty wrote:I do not understand why we are playing Purifoy as a linebacker. Would it not be better to use Lokombo as a Linebacker and drop Purifoy back to DB? He had a lot more success as DB in the early part of the year and could help out the rookies... Just wondering...
When you take a linebacker out in passing situations and replace him with a DB he is called a nickelback. In the CFL most teams play a nickleback full time but still call him a linebacker. So it is sort of a full time hybrid position and Purifoy has been playing that spot all season and continues to do so. However, sometimes he is moved around when a lineman goes out and Lokombo or Araki comes in.
User avatar
DanoT
Hall of Famer
Posts: 4314
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 6:38 pm
Location: Victoria, B.C. in summer, Sun Peaks Resort in winter

KnowItAll wrote:by what names do the football gods go by??
To me Vince Lombardi is a football god. If he were alive today and looking at the Lions he would end up quoting himself: "What the hell is going on out there". Only this time he would be referring to play calling, detailed game planning, in game adjustments, and game time decisions.
User avatar
B.C.FAN
Team Captain
Posts: 12590
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 10:28 pm

DanoT wrote:
Dusty wrote:I do not understand why we are playing Purifoy as a linebacker. Would it not be better to use Lokombo as a Linebacker and drop Purifoy back to DB? He had a lot more success as DB in the early part of the year and could help out the rookies... Just wondering...
When you take a linebacker out in passing situations and replace him with a DB he is called a nickelback. In the CFL most teams play a nickleback full time but still call him a linebacker. So it is sort of a full time hybrid position and Purifoy has been playing that spot all season and continues to do so. However, sometimes he is moved around when a lineman goes out and Lokombo or Araki comes in.
Speaking of Lokombo, his defensive reps seem to have been all but eliminated. I watched the defensive rotations on Friday and Jason Arakgi was getting regular reps at linebacker in rushing situations, with Edem going to the sidelines.

Lokombo had 24 defensive tackles in 2016 but has only nine this year, and none since July 9. Arakgi had four defensive tackles on Oct. 1 against Ottawa and another on Oct. 8 in Winnipeg.
Blitz
Team Captain
Posts: 9094
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 8:44 am

When all is said and done, who knew that 20-18 win over the Stampeders way back on June 25 would be the Lions most impressive result so far. Remember how well the defence played and how we ran the ball down the Stampeders' throats to protect the 2 point lead? Ugh Sammy Greene
You've hit on a really important notion Sammy and also one I mentioned in a previous post..and that is the talent levels of two different teams can often be judged best early in the season, when both are operating out of simpler play books. Our Leos defeated the Stamps in that first game and almost (and should have) beaten the Stamps again in an early season contest in Calgary that we lost in overtime.

However, in the third contest, at home, in Week 9, the Stamps beat us 37-9 and completely dominated us on both offence and defence. Our offence did not score a point in the second half of the game. Jennings was 10/22 (45% completion rate) and only passed for 153 yds in the game. Jennings was pulled but Lulay was only able to throw for 19 yds. on 7 pass attempts.

Both teams were essentially playing with the same talent they started the season with. So what was the difference? Did the Stamps players begin to 'execute' that much better than our Leos players in a few weeks? It would be a stretch of magnitude proportion to think that way.

No, the difference was that we were still playing with the same, simple offensive playbook we started the season with. We were easy to game plan for due to our offensive simplicity and predictablility. Bo Levi Mitchell shredded our defence, going 28/38 (73.7%) and 340 yards of passing. In the first game of the season, against Calgary, when their offensive play book was simpler to begin the season with,our defense held Bo Levi to 233 yds of passing. He was only 16/27 (59.3%).

The Stamps blocked 3 of our punts In that game, and yet our defence still held them down impressively. Calgary only scored 1 point in the 4th quarter of that game, while trying to come back from behind on the scoreboard.

The difference was coaching and by the third game that difference really showed up. Calgary lost a lot of key players from last year's team. But they not only had Dickenson as their new HC but also Huff was still there as a resource and Dickenson has really used him this season in that capacity. But Huff has not forced his views or been controlling. It's been a different approach than the way Buono did it with Benevedes.

I predicted our Leos would finish 4th in the West this season, even with Jennings at quarterback, with us having lot of talent (which was obvious the first time we played the Stamps this season) and had signed a lot of free agents for the first time in the Buono era here in B.C.

I guessed that we would get off to a decent start, based on the "Wally Effect' but as time went on this season, we would slide due to the 'Wally Way'.

I knew we had Dorazio back and our running game under Dorazio usually starts off well and then begins to really struggle as the season progresses. (unless we make some seriously changes to it, as we did 2/3 of the way through the season, in 2013, even changing to man from zone blocking, unheard of do ever do part way through a football season) When you use only one running play, the inside zone read, and one way of blocking it (zone blocking) that is going to happen.

I knew Khari Jones was going to be coordinating our offence, so it would mainly be a pocket passing spread scheme and would be the same scheme we've basically seen here from 2005 (with the exception of the last 12 games of the 2011 season and the 2012 season). I guessed as the season progressed, defences would get better at preparing for it, due to its predictability, while we basically stayed the same and blamed any problems on player 'execution'.

I also guessed that Mark Washington, despite saying, again, that we would be more 'aggressive' on defence, would play a conservative zone scheme and that has happened. He's gotten even more conservative as the season has gone on - rushing three more often and now dropping Bighill into a deep safety position at times. He did that for most of the 2015 season, even though Ronnie Yell was our corner and playing very well. I guessed our defence would play well to start the season and then be more easily exploited due to its simplicity and passivity. I knew, unless we had a Ritchie or a Stubler, our defense would reflect Wally's philosophy of keeping it simple and straight up.

Our offensive and defensive philosophies and offensive scheme really can only win if we have more talent. Even then, we are restricted by our schemes. Just ask Dickenson, who was an excellent quarterback but struggled attempting to execute our predictable scheme in the 2004 Grey Cup game, the 2006 Grey Cup game, and the 2007 WDF. Those teams we had much lesser talent but beat us, or in the case of the 2006 Grey Cup, Montreal's 6th ranked defense really shut us down.

I think we have much better talent than some fans are giving us credit for. I think we have better talent than Winnipeg and Edmonton and Calgary was not more talented than us when we played them twice, earlier in the season. The biggest difference between those teams and our Leos is coaching.

What I am feeling hopeful about is that Khari Jones made some good changes last week against the Bombers. Changes to our scheme don't happen very often during a season. When they have taken place, good thinsg have happened, as in 2011, around Game 6 of that season. They also happened 2/3 of the way through the 2013 season, when we changed our running scheme (plays and blocking) as w scheemas well as added Logan.

We're using Rainey more on offence, we've added some running plays, and we've changed some of Sinkfield's patterns. We've added a jet sweep for Sinkfield and a screen pass. We need a few more changes (some high low crosses, etc) but the direction is good.

But like you, I'm worried about our defence, and I'm worried more about our defensive coaching than our personnel on defence, even though we have a couple of weak spots. The only change Washington has made, has been to drop Bighill into a deep safety at times. Our blitzes are less frequent and don't fool anyone when we use them. We still give up the flat and we still don't scheme to shut down a a good tailback in the passing game or do anything differently to take away an opposition offences' strengths.

Hopefully Washington will make some adjustments but I'm not holding my breath.
"When I went to Catholic high school in Philadelphia, we just had one coach for football and basketball. He took all of us who turned out and had us run through a forest. The ones who ran into the trees were on the football team". (George Raveling)
Blitz
Team Captain
Posts: 9094
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 8:44 am

B.C.FAN wrote:
DanoT wrote:
Dusty wrote:I do not understand why we are playing Purifoy as a linebacker. Would it not be better to use Lokombo as a Linebacker and drop Purifoy back to DB? He had a lot more success as DB in the early part of the year and could help out the rookies... Just wondering...
When you take a linebacker out in passing situations and replace him with a DB he is called a nickelback. In the CFL most teams play a nickleback full time but still call him a linebacker. So it is sort of a full time hybrid position and Purifoy has been playing that spot all season and continues to do so. However, sometimes he is moved around when a lineman goes out and Lokombo or Araki comes in.
Speaking of Lokombo, his defensive reps seem to have been all but eliminated. I watched the defensive rotations on Friday and Jason Arakgi was getting regular reps at linebacker in rushing situations, with Edem going to the sidelines.

Lokombo had 24 defensive tackles in 2016 but has only nine this year, and none since July 9. Arakgi had four defensive tackles on Oct. 1 against Ottawa and another on Oct. 8 in Winnipeg.
That is surprising. Lokombo would be a starting linebacker on most CFL teams. I wonder why we've done that recently. Lokhombo is a much more talented linebacker than Aragki. I like Aragki getting some rotational reps at linebacker but not ahead of Lokombo. We used to use Lokombo as a third linebacker at times on first down and then bring in Purifoy at nickel on longer second downs to begin this season.

Purifoy is not playing as well as he did at the start of this season but we've also changed his role. That different role has reduced Purifoy's natural aggressiveness. So, with a different role for Puifoy, not using Lokombo as often, and dropping Bighill into a safety sopt, it seems as if our direction on defence is to be less aggressive as the season has gone on, even though Washington said he was going to be more 'aggressive' on defence this season. It makes sense to me to have Lokombo in the game at times and to use him as a blitzer at times.

At least Khari Jones has allowed our offensive skill players to play aggressively this season. We need to tone down the double coverage passes but its easier to tone something down than the other way around. Our offence has slid a little - we're now 4th in scoring. Hard to believe the Bombers offence, with Nichols and an average receiving crew has scored more points than us but their offence has also benefited from defensive turnovers.

I just can't figure out Washington at all. . He plays Darius Allen time and again and he makes no impact. He could start Bryant Tuner Jr. instead of Allen but rarely does. Brooks is not the player that he was. He pines Menard, who almost always brings pressure when he does get into a game.He pines Lokombo, who is a talent. He takes away Purifoy's natural instincts and has him playing passively.

He has Sol E. and Bighill covering hook zones while tailbacks are killing us in the flats. He uses two rookies on the boundary side. He drops Bighill into a deep safety while having three National safeties on the bench.
o
For most of this season, we were leading the CFL in sacks and yet our defensive turnovers were at the lower end of the CFL due to our passivity. Now we can't get to the quarterback. We are becoming more and more passive on defence, as this season progresses

I look around the rest of the West and see what Claybrooks has done as a first year defensive coordinator in Calgary. Benevedes defence has at least improved in Edmonton as the season has progressed, unlike Washington's defence. Jones has his defense really coming on now. Richie Hall has the Bombers defence playing a very aggressive style and its sure working for them.

Early this season, we had the best defence in the CFL. Now Calgary and Montreal have better defenses and we are tied with Hamilton for third . Lately, the Bombers, Eskimos, Red Blacks, and Riders defenses have been playing better than our defence has.

Time for Washington to get his coaching act together.
"When I went to Catholic high school in Philadelphia, we just had one coach for football and basketball. He took all of us who turned out and had us run through a forest. The ones who ran into the trees were on the football team". (George Raveling)
User avatar
DanoT
Hall of Famer
Posts: 4314
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 6:38 pm
Location: Victoria, B.C. in summer, Sun Peaks Resort in winter

For me the canary in the coal mine early indicator will be if we see Bighill playing safety and just Elimimian as the only true LB. It will then be a keep everything in front of you D and certain to give up too much in territory and dink and dunk first downs. This accomplishes nothing and gets the D worn out by the 4th quarter. :bang:
User avatar
KnowItAll
Hall of Famer
Posts: 7458
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 6:32 pm
Location: Delta

Blitz wrote:
KnowItAll wrote:by what names do the football gods go by??
I sense a hidden agenda in your question but hopefully it was just a straight forward question. The thread was just written in the way that it was.... in an attempt to write the pre-game analysis a little differently in an attempt to make it a little more interesting.
wow, wasn't expecting such a in depth answer. great job.

I do not know about hidden agenda. On one hand I was trying to be a little bit humorous and on the other hand I was thinking that I don't think there are football gods. Maybe you showed me wrong :)

You are very good at what you post here. Most of them leave me in awe :thup:

I was thinking though while a single God needs no other name, it would make more sense for multiple gods to each have a name. Some may be more favorable to the lions than others :)
Every day that passes is one you can't get back
Blitz
Team Captain
Posts: 9094
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 8:44 am

I was thinking though while a single God needs no other name, it would make more sense for multiple gods to each have a name. Some may be more favorable to the lions than others . KnowItAll
It would make sense that, since there is no single Football God, that they have individual names. As I posted, they probably do, but don't let us mortals know because each would likley prefer just being 'Football God' because they would think a name might diminish them to us 'football fan humans'.

I have wondered though, if the Football Devil, was actually a God too but was kicked out of Football Heaven. Quite frankly, I think Football Devil is advising the Bombers defence.

Since we are on this crazy topic, I think one of the Football Gods needs to give Mark Washington some 'divine intervention''. :wink:

May the Football Gods be with you and always with you KnowItAll :thup: :wink:
"When I went to Catholic high school in Philadelphia, we just had one coach for football and basketball. He took all of us who turned out and had us run through a forest. The ones who ran into the trees were on the football team". (George Raveling)
User avatar
KnowItAll
Hall of Famer
Posts: 7458
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 6:32 pm
Location: Delta

Blitz wrote:
I was thinking though while a single God needs no other name, it would make more sense for multiple gods to each have a name. Some may be more favorable to the lions than others . KnowItAll
It would make sense that, since there is no single Football God, that they have individual names. As I posted, they probably do, but don't let us mortals know because each would likley prefer just being 'Football God' because they would think a name might diminish them to us 'football fan humans'.

I have wondered though, if the Football Devil, was actually a God too but was kicked out of Football Heaven. Quite frankly, I think Football Devil is advising the Bombers defence.

Since we are on this crazy topic, I think one of the Football Gods needs to give Mark Washington some 'divine intervention''. :wink:

May the Football Gods be with you and always with you KnowItAll :thup: :wink:
I think Lancaster may have ascended to become one of them. Bobby Ackles also.

Is Galat still alive. IF not, I could see him being the foodball devil :wink:
Every day that passes is one you can't get back
Post Reply