The matter of wins versus loses was to be a matter of conjecture for me but based on the bill of sale attached to Tedford's arrival, I would have expected far more consistency on the field between games and in games. I was also expecting a greater degree of innovation with the offense and at the very least, an ability to adapt strategy and tactics within games. I guess at the very least, I had hoped a Tedford-coached team would at least be doing or attempting some things on the field that would make the rest of the league, the fans and the media sit up and take notice of the Lions. Instead we are reading about diminishing fan numbers.
However, part of me is fearful of what I think is George Cortez's coaching style, namely bending and shaping players to his direction instead of examining the players available to him and coaching to their strengths. During the Rider's slide in the latter half of last season, he showed a complete unwillingness to adapt to the loss of Durant. He completely mishandled Tino Sunseri and the Rider's run tandem of Messam and Allen. Perhaps Tedford is not taking the Offensive reins to the extent we may have thought or hoped and is instead deferring to Cortez because of his far more recent league experience.
Through out the game in Hamilton, I was often thinking about what the TiCats had done in the last few years to get to where they are. In particular I thought about Austin's first year at the helm when they set a CFL record for the number of different players dressed for a season. The guy was obviously not shy about giving players a chance and if it didn't pan out, too bad so sad, someone else will get a try and maybe they will prove they belong. It seemed like the season was a dress rehearsal for future success. Maybe the Lion's brain trust should just accept this year is a crap shoot and audition a sh*t load of players...maybe something good will come of it before the year is out.
Another facet of Saturday's game was how much the TiCats played in the same manner as which Austin coaches. Namely, with emotion and intensity. And there is also a symmetry to the coaching styles of Austin's assistants, Condell, Steinhauer and Reinebold...take the win with energy, aggression and innovation. Perhaps the vision of how the Lions can win and are to ultimately become champions again is simply disjointed, ununified and murky amongst the players, coaching staff and football operations.
However, one positive I have taken from this year is the losses are not so boring as last years. The Lions are loosing with a certain panache.
Bart Andrus always seemed to me some sort of mad scientist, using alchemy to try and turn lead into gold. Trestman on the other hand was very cerebral and was very willing from the start of his CFL career to examine what the parts were to his team and adapt his coaching. He was a very quick study.JohnHenry wrote:So far the coach seems closer to a Bart Andrus than a Marc Trestman...
I would like Tedford to stick around as his CV remains pretty impressive, there is undeniable potential and this is still early days. However the fact his contract only has one more year after this says to me he doesn't have the greatest support of ownership or Braley is penny-pinching as he did with the Argos and is unwilling to pay for long term success. Also when Braley does sell, who will the new owners want for a football operations/coaching team?