dupsdell1 wrote:B.C.FAN wrote:David Braley and Wally Buono are the best things to ever happen to the Lions. It was great when they had Bob Ackles too but his record as a GM and president was mixed. A lot of the financial problems that the Lions endured in the late 1980s and 1990s were the result of Ackles overpaying for talent during the lucrative Carling O'Keefe TV contract and the honeymoon era of B.C. Place in the 1980s. The money dried up fast in the late '80s and the club collapsed on and off the field. Things didn't begin to recover until Braley bought the Lions at the end of 1997. The Lions haven't missed the playoffs since and probably haven't missed a bill payment either. When new coach Jeff Tedford asked this year for expanded meeting space at the team's practice facility, a new electronic practice clock and iPads for all the players, Braley opened his chequebook and made it happen. The next owner will have big shoes to fill.
Yes David is good for writing chqs but that is it , we need ownership that is for more family price oriented packages , this has been a very stale situation for the lions ever since bob ackles died.
You were like many fans dupsdell - playing right into the Lions hands when you wanted a WC type full lower bowl with the top all draped off.
The Lions' President knew four things (only 3 of which were clear to all with the 4th where fans would need to connect some dots and think a bit more strategically and discover themselves):
1. TSN and HD wasn't going to help their gate as they were going to get local blackouts bringing 2500-3000 more out to games.
2. Fans wanted that wonderful Lower Bowl filled up, stadium draped off or whatever , feeling of intimacy on game day just like Whitecaps.
3. Lulay was hurt and given no other QB unlike in the Dickenson,Printers, Pierce, Jackson days was showing he could step up, Wins might be harder to get and fan numbers were going to be down. Things like women's World Cup and two Thursday games for TSN weren't going to help either.
4. The goal is to move the revenue per ticket up given the lower number of seats available and it can be done based on the Lions data.
The Lions fan survey showed IIRC incomes up in the 90K range for the fans at games and pay more per ticket which the Lions will need to make their revenue targets.
Skulsky on the sidelines didn't injure Travis Lulay (might be a jinx as he and Wally are "wired" so he's playing the hand he's dealt and he's not a marketing guy and certainly not a strategic communicator - he's just a guy who ran a newspaper or two and can read the financial statements and build a network of contacts.
Closing the upper bowl does these things nicely:
1. Allows the Lions to keep raising prices as soon as they re-emerge into the Winners column as a winning team can sell out that lower bowl producing ticket scarcity.
2. Gives them a known cost structure with less risk AND closer revenue structure to hit revenue targets.
____
Bottom Line: My sense is that they might think like the Whitecaps and IIRC they say they won't open the upper deck during the regular season regardless of who they play. That is exactly where the Lions are headed.
The more they win the more fans will pay for it as they only need to look next door to see the Canuck ticket prices and the Lions have a small fraction of home dates to fill and need to get the revenues up per seat to make this profitable.
No doubt Skulsky wants to buy the franchise based on what he has said at other times and I'm not suggesting he's doing the dirty and running the franchise into the ground but in a management buyout it might not be a bad tactic to do just what they are doing now.
Its like 3G Capital and the Kraft - Heinz merger. 3G are great at lowering the base cost structure but this comes at the expense of any market share or market growth as they do this by eliminating costs like jobs. I see this morning the shoe is dropping and job cuts were announced. Why Buffett got into bed with 3G astounds me.