Great read DavidDavid wrote:I agree Blitz. Last week I was confident about Partridge's place as Lulay's backup, but not so much anymore. He's going to need a monster of a game tonight with Jennings and/or McGhee faltering by some combination of really poor execution of the offence, lack of ball security/turning it over, or bad reads/a poor understanding of what looks the defense is providing (less likely given that the Stamps' D is likely to be somewhat vanilla - 4/3, few stunts, blitzes etc.).Blitz wrote: Right now, it looks like our quarterbacks going into this season are going to be Lulay, Jennings, and McGhee.
With Lulay's background of injury (he's started less an 50% of our games over the past two seasons) I would think that we would keep a quarterback on the practice roster. That could be Partridge or even Beck, once he heals up or it could be someone else.
Jennings starts tonite with McGhee also getting reps. How much Partridge gets to play will tell the story of the Leos decision making.
Jennings' performance has made him the de facto #2. To top it off, I heard Tedford heap praise on McGhee last night (I think this is available on BCLions.com) which provides some insight into to where he's leaning. McGhee is one of "his guys." His recruit. No different than the NFL bias toward their draft picks or prized recruits - they're going to be given every opportunity.
I don't think Travis P has necessarily had a bad camp, but I don't think he's 'wowed' everyone like Jennings has (especially in the past week) or shown McGhee's flashes of promise. And let's not forget, Jennings and McGhee can also pull the ball down and do damage with their feet. But here's the thing. I don't think Partridge is going anywhere 'til Beck is properly evaluated as IMO, as we're going to need 4 QBs on the roster (active and PR) just given concerns/uncertainty with Lulay's shoulder. But if Partridge shows really well tonight, I don't think the club is going to be patiently waiting for Beck to come around.
DH
I have no idea why Beck is even in the conversation now, if Tedford believes that Jennings and McPhee are good enough for the future. Beck is not a developmental quarterback. His only value was his experience but if Lulay went down Id' prefer us to play a rookie qb with promise than waste time (other than the immediate present) on a quarterback who is not the longer term future.
I like Partridge. He is a big quarterback who is very mobile for his size. He is confident, makes quick decisions, he can operate inside and outside the pocket, he is accurate in both the short and intermediate game and he can throw the deep route well. He has a strong arm and he can also take off and run the football. He has a lot of intangibles. I think that he has shown that he is too confident at times in terms of attempting to gun the football into lower percentage plays but that can be coached. However, as you said, Jennings and McGhee have not only shown well, Partridge has had some turnovers in camp, and not being a Tedford selection doesn't help. You're rignt - Partridge will have to be lights out tonite in order to be one of the three that we dress to start the season. But if Partridge can impress, he could stick on the practice roster rather than Beck and you never know.