MexicoLionFan wrote:Football has CHANGED FOR GOOD, it is a game of systems as much as players now...that means that coaching is now more important than ever! Cortez isn't young, and he is a proponent of a system that has been "figured out" by CFL defences. What I have always liked and admired about Cortez, is that HE WILL MAKE ADJUSTMENTS to win games if they are necessary. Plus, Cortez has always been smart enough to ACCENTUATE the talent that you have...he had success in SSK because he knew how well they could run the football...this kept teams guessing on what they would do on a given down and this turned Durant into a better QB than he actually was...would he do that here or would he simply revert back to the spread because of our situation with Dorazio and the OLine...I believe this is a great chance for the Lions to go out and bring in the youngest, brightest minds in football and build around their knowledge and energy...start making it hard for teams to prepare against us, instead of easy under Wally's tenure.
The opening here is not what I'd agree with.
The MOST critical role for a HC is to set the direction and tone for the team and lay out the culture and enlist assistants and the core players to buy in as without the meeting of minds between the players and the coaches the best systems in the world won't win a championship. Words don't cut it. But a clear performance oriented culture that players buy in to and the coaches rally around.
The most critical decision a new HC must make is what to with assistants. We know the Lions got off easy and made just a transitional payment to the former HC and not sure of when assistant contracts run out but these decisions will determine what direction they are planning to go in.
As far as Cortez goes he'd have to convince me that he understood what went wrong in Hamilton as HC and how he was about to correct it.
The irony of posters who suggest that none of us here have been pro coaches defies common sense when we see failures of brilliant Coordinators when they rise to the ranks of HC - Stubler and Cortez. Reed, Benevides - both failed to see the role of HC and how it had to work.
These guys didn't fail as HC's because of systems they failed as they didn't lead. They were around successful HCs yet when they got the reigns of power didn't follow what they saw those who successful were doing.
The last thing anyone should believe is that this leads to success as HC:
a) many years as a successful coordinator or
b) outstanding systems guy
It amazes me that the failing former successful coordinators either:
a) didn't understand the role difference.
b) didn't get or take advice that would save their job.
c) didn't hire good people to help them save their job.
The old saying is that you get hired for your technical skills but get fired in higher level roles for your lack of conceptual and human skills.