^^great post. Does anyone really believe that the Guarantee Win really affected the game outcome? Did it cost the Lions the 4 point difference in the game? Not a chance. The Riders O line is one of the best in the CFL and the Lions D is one of the worst in the CFL against the run...that and a poorly planned and called game on O is what cost the Lions the game, the challenge from the team president did not cost the Lions the game.sj-roc wrote:WADR, do you honestly believe we would have won that game if only DS had kept his mouth shut? We stunk out the joint big time. If it weren't for Tim Brown it wouldn't have even come down to the last play.David wrote:I said it was a dumb move before today and I stand by it. Not for reasons off the field but on it. A "guarantee" win is too much ammunition for the opponent. With a master motivator like Corey Chamblin, it was asking for trouble. The Riders looked like the hungrier team today, certainly from the second quarter onward; a team that had been challenged. Called out.
DH
As for off the field, I don't think we would have gotten anywhere near 33k without it. I suppose some might call the figure underwhelming but, as was noted when it was announced, it was the 4th largest crowd in the whole league so far this season (and less than 250 away from being 2nd largest). With crowds down almost right across the board this season, comparing to past years is a bit of a flawed exercise.
The whole billboard/guarantee win was fun for the fans and media and it created a buzz in the media around the league and got additional fans in the seats so it was a success even if the Lions weren't.