Official NFL Thread: 2014-2015 Season

Discuss the NHL, NFL, CIS, NCAA, Lacrosse, Soccer, Baseball, Basketball, Motorsports, Golf, Rugby, Amateur Sport, Curling, Wrestling ... Whatever Sport or Leisure activity you like!

Moderator: Team Captains

Post Reply
User avatar
notahomer
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6258
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2002 12:09 pm
Location: Vancouver

South Pender wrote:Yeah, nota, you're right; it is kind of odd schedule-wise. I agree that the Cowboys are the better team, but sometimes the Bears can be really tough at home in Soldier Field. It might be a decent game--two good quarterbacks. The Bears' defense is dreadful, though, so who knows? Here's the preview (Cowboys favored by 3.5):

http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/201412040 ... ab=preview
Had a busy day so I kinda snoozed through the Thursday Nighter..... :sleep: Not saying it described the game, more how my day went.....

Woke up to a phone call during halftime.....14-7 Cowboys at the time.... :sleep: drifted off again.... Cowboys were winning by three touchdowns..... got closer by the end but this was a game the Cowboys obviously dominated since they won by 13 or so by the end of the game.
_____________________
Makes one wonder about Trestman. Love the guy as an exCFL coach but does he survive the off-season? Doubt it. Lovie Smith had some success including a Superbowl appearance so he earned himself some rope. Trestman? He was brought in to fix the offence, has that even happened? I'd vote yes but barely. And any offensive improvement has been at the expense of what has been for a long time a SOLID Bears defence.
____________________________________________________________
Been awhile inbetween Seahawks games or so it seems. They did play last week but it was a road game and on THanksgiving. I'm NEVER happy to hear a players been injured but it seems that the Arizona Cardinals may slip out of the NFC West lead and maybe those Seahawks have a shot at defending a division title I thought they had NO chance of defending just a week/so ago.
__________________________________________________________
Crunch time for a team I now hate the 49ers. Apparently its lockerroom drama. Maybe, I don't know or care. I thought it was a mistake to sell the farm for Kaepernick but I'm thrilled they did.
________________________________________________________
Lots of other QB drama throughout the league. Johnny Football :dizzy: RG3 :dizzy: These are two guys in particular that probably have solid football futures, I'm just not so sure it'll be where they are now. RG3 in particular. I heard the rumour (via a South P-post) he just doesn't like to do the video type work. Not surprised. He's a guy whose succeeded everywhere with little work. Just the talent the guy had was more than enough and sure enough, it was more than enough for MOST of the first season he was an NFLer too. But, the NFL adapts and changes IF it thinks those will impact your game and for RG3, I think it has. Not sure if he'll get another snap this year but I'm betting he sits down with a Tony Dungy type and gets some friendly career advice and we'll see a RG3-version 2.0 shooting the lights out a year/two down the road......
South Pender
Legend
Posts: 2779
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 9:24 am
Location: Vancouver weekdays; Gulf Islands on weekends

Here`s a somewhat alarming story involving Brandon Marshall and the hit to his ribs in last night`s action against the Cowboys. Although he often comes off as something of a d-bag, Marshall is one very good receiver.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/20 ... ng-injury/

Brandon Marshall remains hospitalized with lung injury
Posted by Michael David Smith on December 5, 2014, 2:42 PM EST

A hit that Bears receiver Brandon Marshall took on Thursday night still has him hospitalized on Friday afternoon.

The Bears announced that Marshall remains hospitalized because of a lung injury. Marshall also has two broken ribs.

Marshall made a great catch on fourth-and-7 to extend the Bears’ first scoring drive, but he paid a serious price for it when he took a knee to the back from Dallas defensive back Barry Church. Marshall was in obvious pain and was taken by ambulance from Soldier Field to a Chicago hospital.

Bears coach Marc Trestman said he went to visit Marshall in the hospital after Thursday night’s game and he “was in very good spirits.”

The Bears say Marshall will definitely miss next week’s game against the Saints but that it is not yet known whether he will be able to return at all this season. Realistically, it’s hard to see why a player who suffered such a serious injury would return to the field in the next few weeks, especially when the Bears are effectively out of the playoff race and have nothing to play for. Marshall and the Bears should think of his long-term health and put his season to an end.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

And this just in. Migawd, what is this? British soccer hooliganism? (See first link below.)

http://sports.yahoo.com/news/soccer-hoo ... --sow.html

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/20 ... -stabbing/

Fan alleges compliment about Packers preceded stabbing
Posted by Mike Wilkening on December 5, 2014, 8:06 PM EST

Did a Bears fan’s envy of the Packers set off a chain of events leading to a stabbing in a parking lot outside of Soldier Field on Thursday night?

According to a published report, one of two men stabbed in the incident alleges that’s the way it went down.

The fan, who was not identified, told the Chicago Tribune the problems started after he complemented the NFC North-leading Packers and another man got mad.

“I was saying the Packers are awesome this year, why can’t I be born a Packers fan?” the stabbed man interviewed by the Tribune alleged.

The man told the Tribune the altercation did not begin after someone said “Bears suck,” which is alleged in the police report, with the man telling the newspaper he believed the alleged attacking group were Bears fans.

The Bears (5-8) lost 41-28 to Dallas on Thursday night.

The man interviewed by the Tribune was stabbed in the shoulder, with his friend stabbed eight or nine times in the back. However, both received treatment for their injuries and were discharged from a local hospital.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The state of things in Washington, DC:

1. Washington tickets going for nearly nothing
Posted by Mike Florio on December 6, 2014, 8:43 AM EST

With Washington mired in another season of unfulfilled expectations, it’s getting a lot cheaper to personally witness the team fail to fulfill expectations.

Via John Keim of ESPN.com, some tickets to Sunday’s game against the Rams have fallen to a price of $4 on the secondary market. Standing-room only seats can be had for a mere $3.

Elsewhere, more than 6,400 tickets can be purchased starting at $5.25.

None of this affects the franchise directly; Washington has received face value for most if not all of the tickets already sold. But the folks who have decided they’d rather stay home than use the tickets that they’ve purchased are the ones losing money.

Eventually, those are the people who may decide to quit paying face value for tickets. And that’s when Washington owner Daniel Snyder will have a major problem.

So what will be done to keep that from occurring? Answers will come in as few as 23 days, after the team’s regular season ends.
__________________________________________________________________

and this:

2. TMZ jumps aboard the anti-RG3 bandwagon
Posted by Michael David Smith on December 6, 2014, 12:33 PM EST

The hits keep coming from all quarters for embattled Washington quarterback Robert Griffin III.

Stories citing unnamed sources questioning Griffin’s ability and work ethic have become so commonplace that even TMZ has jumped into the mix, with a story quoting an unnamed player on the team ripping into Griffin.

“No one is happy . . . no one gets the hype around him anymore. . . . I don’t see him being in the NFL for that long. . . . I think he goes into politics. He’s good at that kinda thing,” the player tells TMZ.

It’s surprising to see TMZ report on this kind of story because when TMZ covers the NFL, it’s usually breaking stories about players’ lives away from the game, be it in the Ray Rice and Adrian Peterson legal cases or stories about players’ personal lives. It’s unusual to see TMZ report on a player’s popularity within his own locker room.

As Dan Steinberg of the Washington Post notes, however, one particular Washington player seems to have a relationship with TMZ: DeSean Jackson, who talks to TMZ about everything from his side business breeding dogs to how much money he spends on jewelry.

The TMZ headline also refers to the unnamed player bad-mouthing Griffin as a “star.” There aren’t many stars on the roster in Washington (some would say there aren’t any stars on the roster in Washington), but Jackson is about the closest thing the team has to a star. And one TMZ quote in particular, in which the unnamed teammate says he’s frustrated with Griffin because “We don’t have that real rapport,” sounds like the kind of thing a receiver would say about a quarterback. Jackson’s stats this season have been better when Kirk Cousins and Colt McCoy are throwing to him than when Griffin is throwing to him.

We don’t know and may never know who the player talking to TMZ about Griffin is, but just as Steve Young’s criticisms of Griffin seemed to be coming from Mike Shanahan, it doesn’t require a huge leap to infer that TMZ’s criticisms of Griffin may be coming from Jackson.

In any event, this surely won’t be the last time we see a story in which unnamed sources in Washington bad-mouth Griffin. It’s open season on RG3.
South Pender
Legend
Posts: 2779
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 9:24 am
Location: Vancouver weekdays; Gulf Islands on weekends

NFL Week 14 Previews and Odds

1. Sunday, Dec. 7, 10:00 a.m. PST:

Ravens at Dolphins: http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/201412070 ... ab=preview; Odds: Dolphins by 3

Steelers at Bengals: http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/201412070 ... ab=preview; Bengals by 3

Colts at Browns: http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/201412070 ... ab=preview; Colts by 3.5

Texans at Jaguars: http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/201412070 ... ab=preview; Texans by 6

Giants at Titans: http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/201412070 ... ab=preview; Titans by 1

Panthers at Saints: http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/201412070 ... ab=preview; Saints by 10

Buccaneers at Lions: http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/201412070 ... ab=preview; Lions by 10

Rams at Washington: http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/201412070 ... ab=preview; Rams by 3

Jets at Vikings: http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/201412070 ... ab=preview; Vikings by 5.5

2. Sunday, Dec. 7, 1:05 or 1:25 p.m. PST:

Bills at Broncos: http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/201412071 ... ab=preview; Broncos by 10

Chiefs at Cardinals: http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/201412070 ... ab=preview; Chiefs by 1

49ers at Raiders: http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/201412071 ... ab=preview; 49ers by 8

Seahawks at Eagles: http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/201412071 ... ab=preview; Eagles by 1

3. Sunday, Dec. 7, 5:30 p.m. PST:

Patriots at Chargers: http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/201412071 ... ab=preview; Patriots by 4

4. Monday, Dec. 8, 5:30 p.m. PST:

Falcons at Packers: http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/201412080 ... ab=preview; Packers by 13

Some random game notes:

1. Morning games: The first three in the above list could be good games--all have playoff implications.

2. Afternoon games: Two are what should be great games: Chiefs at Cardinals and Seahawks at Eagles. All having important playoff implications.

3. Sunday nighter: Could be a good game. I expect the Patriots to rebound from their 26-21 loss in Green Bay last weekend and play well in San Diego. I think the Patriots win that one.

4. Monday nighter: Could be another blowout at Lambeau. The Falcons are improved from last year, but I doubt they are up to challenging the Packers at Lambeau. Aaron Rodgers could have a very big night.

5. NFC-West. A Cardinals loss coupled with a Seahawks win would put the two teams into a tie, both at 9-4, with the 49ers (who should win easily in a laugher) one game back at 8-5. If this were to happen, the Seahawks at Cardinals in two weeks could be huge, with the NFC-West title on the line.

6. NFC-North. The weekend will probably end up with the Packers at 10-3 and the Lions right behind them at 9-4. Both teams have a fairly easy 3-game schedule heading into the final regular season game for them on Dec. 28 at Lambeau. This could be for the NFC-North crown. Neat how the NFL schedule-makers have put most of the key divisional games at the end of the season.
South Pender
Legend
Posts: 2779
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 9:24 am
Location: Vancouver weekdays; Gulf Islands on weekends

More from the burning trash heap that is the Washington football team: Is Snyder stupid enough to do what's described in the article? You bet he is.

Report: Snyder, Allen may side with RG3 and fire Gruden

Posted by Michael David Smith on December 6, 2014, 5:17 PM EST

If Jay Gruden really is done with quarterback Robert Griffin III, does that mean Griffin’s days in Washington are numbered?

Not necessarily. The other option is that Gruden’s days in Washington are numbered.

And according to Jason Reid of the Washington Post, that’s a possibility. In the latest of what is becoming an all-too-frequent stream of quotes from unnamed sources, a team official tells Reid that Gruden could be “one and done,” a team official said, meaning Gruden could be fired even though he’s just wrapping up the first year of his five-year contract.

The issue is that while Gruden appears to have concluded that Griffin isn’t the right person to be the franchise quarterback, owner Dan Snyder and G.M. Bruce Allen may not be on board with that conclusion. And if Snyder and Allen ultimately decide that they want Griffin to be their quarterback, while Gruden is adamant that he can’t win with Griffin, Snyder and Allen may decide to move on.

It wouldn’t be the first time a coach is one-and-done on Snyder’s team. Snyder fired Marty Schottenheimer after just one season in 2001. That precipitated the hiring of Steve Spurrier. It remains to be seen which coach Snyder thinks could turn his team around this time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mike Florio with some notes on tomorrow's Seahawks-Eagles game:

Week 14 “Three and Out”: Seahawks at Eagles
Posted by Mike Florio on December 6, 2014, 5:38 PM EST

On a weekend full of great games, perhaps the greatest will happen in Philadelphia, where a pair of Thanksgiving road victors who won their latest games by the combined score of 52-13 will square off for potential NFC supremacy.

The 8-4 Seahawks and 9-3 Eagles meet with a lot on the line. The winner moves closer to capturing a division title, a bye, and possibly home-field advantage throughout the playoffs. The loser faces the possibility of missing the postseason altogether.

So here are three questions and answers in advance of the top game of Sunday afternoon.

1. Will Jeremy Maclin avoid Richard Sherman?

No, Maclin won’t. The wideout typically lines up on the right side of the offense, and Sherman typically lines up on the left side of the defense. Which puts them on a collision course.

“You watch tape of every team they’ve played,” Maclin said this week. “You see plays being made here and there.”

The Eagles will need something more than plays being made “here and there” to beat the Seahawks. And it’s fair for the Eagles to expect Maclin to make something happen, given that he already has generated more than 1,000 receiving yards for the first time in his career, in a contract year.

2. Who will cover Jordan Matthews?

Matthews, a favorite target of quarterback Mark Sanchez, does most of his damage from the slot. When in the slot, the rookie can expect to be covered by cornerbacks Jeremy Lane or Marcus Burley.

Lane is a game-time decision with a glute injury that caused him to miss the Thanksgiving night win at San Francisco. It’s possible that Byron Maxwell will slide inside and Tharold Simon will take the outside spot across from Sherman.

For now, though, the options are believed to be Lane or Burley. And they’ll have their hands full with Matthews.

3. Does Mark Sanchez have any hard feelings toward Pete Carroll?

Sanchez says he doesn’t, though it wouldn’t be a shock if deep down he did. After all, Carroll showed up at the press conference during which Sanchez declared his intention to leave USC early, and Carroll then took a fire hose to the parade by talking about the size of the mistake that Sanchez was making.

That diss didn’t help Sanchez the last time he faced Carroll, with three sacks, two turnovers, and nine completions on 22 attempts in a 28-7 loss. Maybe this time, with a better team around him, Sanchez can get what would be a signature win for a team that could use it.
South Pender
Legend
Posts: 2779
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 9:24 am
Location: Vancouver weekdays; Gulf Islands on weekends

Wow, what a game in Philly. The Seahawks' defense was just stifling, holding Chip Kelly's accelerated offense to 139 total yards (vs. 440 for the 'Hawks). Have you guys ever seen as much ragging on the officials as we saw today from Chip Kelly? But anyway, total dominance by the Seahawks. Nice to see rookies Paul Richardson and Kevin Norwood getting involved in the offense.

Too bad that Arizona won too. But what the heck is going on with the 49ers, losing to Oakland, that's right Oakland? Looks as if Derek Carr had a good afternoon and Colin Kaepernick didn't.

Seahawks at Eagles recap: https://www.google.ca/search?q=seahawks ... 8wfZu4GwBA

Chiefs at Cardinals recap: http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/201412070 ... &tab=recap

49ers at Raiders recap: http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/201412071 ... &tab=recap

I think we can expect a strong finish to the season by the Seahawks. It looks as if Max Unger will be back for next week's game at home against the 49ers. He's really been missed, I think, and a lot of the breakdowns in pass-blocking are on his replacements (first Patrick Lewis and today Lemuel Jeanpierre). Unger is a stud at centre--a great blocker and leader on the O-line.

I agree with Troy Aikman's assessment that the Packers and Seahawks are probably the strongest teams in the NFC at present (although it would be a big mistake to underestimate the Cardinals, Cowboys, and Lions).

N'awlins favored by 10 get blown out at home by the lowly Panthers: http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/201412070 ... &tab=recap. Looks as the NFC-South might be won by a 7-9 (or, heaven forbid, a 6-10) team.

The Rams (who should not be taken lightly and who play the Seahawks in Seattle in the final game of the regular season) destroyed Washington, who amassed all of 27 yards rushing: http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/201412070 ... &tab=recap The ensuing dynamics in Washington over the next three weeks will prove interesting, I think. Who will survive this dumpster fire? RGIII or Jay Gruden?

Something of an upset in Cincinnati, with the visiting Steelers winning going away: http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/201412070 ... &tab=recap.

A heart-breaker in Cleveland as the Browns lose by one point on a last-minute TD with 32 seconds left: http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/201412070 ... &tab=recap. I watched this one, and I can really see why everyone is impressed with Andrew Luck. For a really big guy, he's very good at scrambling out of trouble. He was harried all game long by a very decent Browns defense, but--as with all great quarterbacks--he found a way to win. He's a beauty.

Jets at Vikings. This had minor interest for me, but I was curious about how Percy Harvin would do in the completely dysfunctional family that is the New York Jets. It seems he did pretty well today, catching 6 balls for 124 yards. Still the Jets lost, as is their wont. I think the Vikes have finally found a competent quarterback in Teddy Bridgewater. He went 19 of 27 for 309 yards today, with two TDs, but also one interception. http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/201412070 ... &tab=recap

The Sunday nighter. Really a defensive struggle--seemed like a bit of an ugly game to me. I will say that the Chargers are a better team than I had imagined, and I think most of the credit probably should go to HC Mike McCoy. He has them playing well. Their (really good) defense was news to me and kept the game close. Still, the Patriots wore them down and won in the end. Oddly enough, just not enough offensive production from what's usually been a potent Chargers attack. Recap:

http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/201412071 ... &tab=recap

The Monday nighter. The NFC-South-leading (at 5-7) Falcons visit the 9-3 Packers on the frozen tundra of Lambeau Field. Pack should win, but we'll see. Here's the preview again:

http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/201412080 ... ab=preview
Last edited by South Pender on Sun Dec 07, 2014 9:21 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
notahomer
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6258
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2002 12:09 pm
Location: Vancouver

I enjoyed the Seattle/Eagles game. I've watched a bit of this Eagles offence under Chip Kelly and he wasn't able to run a lot of the stuff they usually do. What I mean is get some success on a drive and then use that success to keep the Defence off-balance via quick snaps, not allowing subs etc..... These things can't get done when you AIN"T moving the ball. Sanchez certainly didn't look AMAZING but he didn't look as awful as he did in a Jets uni...IOW, it wasn't Sanchez/Eagles, IMO, it was the Seahawks D that caused problems...
_____________________________________________________________________________
The Colts/Browns game was a bit of a close one. I missed the ending but the Colts were able to pull that one out of the bag via a late TD
_____________________________________
Raiders BEAT the 49ers! :beer: Raider have sucked and continue to suck but they were able to beat the 49ers. I guess the shine of one of my least favourite QB's maybe wearing off....
____________________________________
RG3? Not sure what they''ll do but his first year success sounds like it'll be holding him back. "I did well, you guys are the problem". Right!?! I know Shanahan is not the best coach of all time but he's won Superbowls. Maybe Shanahan is like Wally Buono, now, "I just can't seem to be in touch with todays player...."
South Pender
Legend
Posts: 2779
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 9:24 am
Location: Vancouver weekdays; Gulf Islands on weekends

notahomer wrote:I enjoyed the Seattle/Eagles game. I've watched a bit of this Eagles offence under Chip Kelly and he wasn't able to run a lot of the stuff they usually do. What I mean is get some success on a drive and then use that success to keep the Defence off-balance via quick snaps, not allowing subs etc..... These things can't get done when you AIN"T moving the ball. Sanchez certainly didn't look AMAZING but he didn't look as awful as he did in a Jets uni...IOW, it wasn't Sanchez/Eagles, IMO, it was the Seahawks D that caused problems...
_____________________________________________________________________________
The Colts/Browns game was a bit of a close one. I missed the ending but the Colts were able to pull that one out of the bag via a late TD
_____________________________________
Raiders BEAT the 49ers! :beer: Raider have sucked and continue to suck but they were able to beat the 49ers. I guess the shine of one of my least favourite QB's maybe wearing off....
____________________________________
RG3? Not sure what they''ll do but his first year success sounds like it'll be holding him back. "I did well, you guys are the problem". Right!?! I know Shanahan is not the best coach of all time but he's won Superbowls. Maybe Shanahan is like Wally Buono, now, "I just can't seem to be in touch with todays player...."
RGIII is starting to look like a coach-killer. I think Shanahan was a good coach, but he was saddled with RGIII whether he wanted him or not. Now Jay Gruden is similarly handicapped. I think Gruden would like to go with Colt McCoy, but Dan Snyder will probably meddle and push Griffin.

Yep, Kaep sucked today by the looks of it. 18 of 33 for 174 yards and 2 ints. The shine is indeed fading....

Here's a piece from Pro Football Talk on the contrast between Derek Carr and Colin Kaepernick in today's game:

Carr excels, Kaepernick struggles as Raiders upset 49ers
Posted by Michael David Smith on December 7, 2014, 7:29 PM EST

Raiders quarterback Derek Carr had a big game today, and 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick did not.

It wasn’t all about the quarterbacks, but the biggest takeaway from Oakland’s upset win over San Francisco is that Carr looks like just the kind of bright young quarterback the Raiders hoped they were drafting this year, while Kaepernick looks like he’s regressed.

Carr was poised, confident, accurate and efficient as he completed 22 of 28 passes for 254 yards, with three touchdown passes and no interceptions. Carr also seems more in control of the offense than most rookies, capable of changing plays at the line and catching the opposing defense off guard. This was an impressive performance.

But Kaepernick, who threw two interceptions and was sacked five times, looked out of sync for most of the game. The 49ers had three delay of game penalties because Kaepernick repeatedly struggled to get his signals called in time, and Kaepernick’s passes often missed the mark.

The loss drops the 49ers to 7-6 and makes it a near certainty that they won’t be going to the playoffs. In fact, the biggest question now isn’t whether the 49ers will make the postseason, but whether Jim Harbaugh is already checked out and looking for his next job.

Some people think his next job will be in Oakland, as head coach of the Raiders. If so, he may just have a better quarterback in Oakland next year than he has in San Francisco now.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This article on tonight's Patriots-Chargers game (from Pro Football Talk):

Sunday Night wrap-up: Pats take advantage of Mike McCoy
Posted by Darin Gantt on December 7, 2014, 11:36 PM EST

Chargers coach Mike McCoy was working as an assistant for John Fox when the Broncos coach (then with the Panthers) said “a punt is not a bad play.”

Except, sometimes it is.

When the Chargers punted away to the Patriots trailing 23-14 with 6:19 to go, they may have given away the best/only chance they had to win the game.

Faced with a fourth-and-4 at the 50-yard line, the Chargers surrendered the ball, knowing they needed a two stops and two scores.

They lost more than four minutes and 30 yards in the process, and didn’t get a chance to make it matter, never moving the final score.

The conservative approach has served McCoy well in a global sense, as he built the Chargers into a clutch-and-grab team that can play with anybody in the AFC, thanks to a smart quarterback and a solid run game and defense.

They don’t have overwhelming talent on the edges, and Philip Rivers is better suited to performing meatball surgery than working in the pristine operating rooms Tom Brady is accustomed to performing in.

But for the Chargers to have a chance, their coach has to give them one. Sunday, McCoy, as smart as he is, didn’t.

Here are five more things we learned during Sunday Night Football:

1. The whole Revis Island thing is real, and it works.

Patriots cornerback Darrelle Revis draped himself all over Chargers wide receiver Keenan Allen, and kept him off the board for more than a half.

It was the third quarter before Allen was even targeted, and Revis was the sole reason for that.

Granted, Malcom Floyd’s touchdown catch was beautiful, and Antonio Gates is still a dangerous target. But without Allen, the Chargers Offense is missing a key part.

2. Speaking of Patriots cornerbacks, Brandon Browner’s penalty in the third quarter which took an interception off the board was a bad call.

The combination of Browner’s track record and Ladarius Green’s head snapping backward like it was on the end of a rubber band made it look worse than it actually was.

And it was a big, hard hit. Also a legal one.

There was plenty of time to review that play before calling it a helmet-to-helmet hit, which it wasn’t, as Browner clearly got him with his shoulder.

Even though Green didn’t return to the game with a concussion, it doesn’t change the fact that the visceral reaction to the hit weighed more heavily on the refs than where it actually landed.

3. The 2-11 Titans couldn’t use linebacker Akeem Ayers.

The Super Bowl-contending Patriots are glad to have him.

Ayers came up with the redemptive interception in the third quarter, taking the refs off the hook for a botched call (see above).

And this isn’t to bang on the Titans, plenty of people have done that already.

But the beauty of Bill Belichick is the way he’s able to make odd parts fit his system, and to take undervalued commodities and make them more valuable than they were otherwise.

4. Boy, the way Tom Brady threw it right to Manti Te’o before halftime, it’s like he didn’t even see him.

Yeah, it’s a cheap joke. But it’s also reflective of the way Te’o has largely disappeared from our collective consciousness since he entered the league with the specter of a fake dead girlfriend hanging over his head.

It’s a shame we made so much of Te’o because of his ridiculous back-story at the time, and if we’d have known his future role maybe we wouldn’t have.

He’s not a horrible player, and not a great one. He’s a perfectly acceptable two-down linebacker who does a solid job, the kind the NFL is full of, who never get that kind of attention. And frankly, they probably would never want it.

5. Chargers kicker Nick Novak is not a horrible punter.

But they’re going to need a regular one if Mike Scifres is as hurt as he looks.

Scifres didn’t return after landing awkwardly on his left shoulder in the second quarter, forcing Novak into double duty.

Novak did the best he could, despite not having punted regularly since high school. He actually got better as the night went on, after a 27-yarder on his first attempt. His next three were 33, 45 and 51 yards.

Solid. For a kicker.
___________________________________________________________________

If the Seahawks don't have the best corners in the NFL, the Patriots do, with Darrelle Revis and Brandon Browner.

One item of note re the Seahawks: WR Chris Matthews (of CFL outstanding rookie fame with the Bombers) was added to the Seahawks' 53-man squad for today's game. I didn't catch his number out there, but it's possible he was in for one or more plays. The 'Hawks need help at the WR position, and a really big guy like Matthews (6-5, 230) might be able to make a contribution to their offense--particular in the red zone. I've been following Matthews in his on and off spells on the Seahawks' practice squad. I hope he sticks with the 'Hawks. He really does have many of the measurables needed in a WR--4.57 40 speed, excellent (sub-7 sec.) 3-cone drill time, size.
South Pender
Legend
Posts: 2779
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 9:24 am
Location: Vancouver weekdays; Gulf Islands on weekends

The Monday nighter: Falcons at Packers. Funny game. Looked like a rout at the end of the first half--31-7 Packers. But the Packers' defense just looked awful in the second half, letting the Falcons hang around, and, actually, almost win. Julio Jones ran wild through the Packers' secondary for 259 yards, and had he not injured himself near the end of the 4th quarter, he might have won the game by himself for the Falcons. Final score 43-37. Had the game gone on for another 5 minutes, I think the Falcons would have won. Just very strange. We know that the defense has not been the strength of the Packers for some time, but they've looked a lot better than they did in the 2nd half tonight. Pundits have been calling the Packers the best team in the NFC lately. After tonight, I really doubt that. Cardinals and Seahawks look better at this point IMO. Here's the recap of a real head-scratcher:

http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/201412080 ... &tab=recap
User avatar
notahomer
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6258
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2002 12:09 pm
Location: Vancouver

South Pender wrote:The Monday nighter: Falcons at Packers. Funny game. Looked like a rout at the end of the first half--31-7 Packers. But the Packers' defense just looked awful in the second half, letting the Falcons hang around, and, actually, almost win. Julio Jones ran wild through the Packers' secondary for 259 yards, and had he not injured himself near the end of the 4th quarter, he might have won the game by himself for the Falcons. Final score 43-37. Had the game gone on for another 5 minutes, I think the Falcons would have won. Just very strange. We know that the defense has not been the strength of the Packers for some time, but they've looked a lot better than they did in the 2nd half tonight. Pundits have been calling the Packers the best team in the NFC lately. After tonight, I really doubt that. Cardinals and Seahawks look better at this point IMO. Here's the recap of a real head-scratcher:

http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/201412080 ... &tab=recap
I missed it :bang: Of course the MNF game that is a gem for offence, I miss cuz I assummed Packer would BLOW the Falcons out of the water. It does seem to be a thing about following NFL. Perhaps we do this in the CFL too. Just keep saying stuff again and again like Packers are the best and eventually it'll be true, I guess. Another example of this is Johnny Football in Cleveland. The pundits were just going to keep asking and poking and prodding until he got to play. Now he'll get to play by the sounds of it. If he does well: WHY WASn'T he in there SOONER? If he struggles "WHY DID YOU THROW HIM TO THE WOLVES, Hoyer was doing fine".
________________________________________________________
IMO, the Browner hit SHOULD NOT have been a flag in yesterdays game. I just don't see how a guy is supposed to play the game a certain way for years and then suddenly be asked to change. I get it, the injuries need to be addressed but IMO, he clearly hit with the shoulder, maybe that shouldn't be the rule. I don't know how you keep players safe(r) and have the game be played with contact. It was a solid hit. Maybe those hits need to be removed too but whats the rule then....?
_____________________________________________________
I still would like to see more offensive PI calls get made. At times PI gets called on offensive players but IMO, it should be called more. Offences are given the ball as a point of foul as though they made the catch. Almost surefire INTERCEPTIONS, if they are flagged, are not penalized anywhere near the potential the same way a defensive PI is penalized. I know, I know, more flags, are you NUTZ? Kinda :wink:
South Pender
Legend
Posts: 2779
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 9:24 am
Location: Vancouver weekdays; Gulf Islands on weekends

notahomer wrote:IMO, the Browner hit SHOULD NOT have been a flag in yesterdays game. I just don't see how a guy is supposed to play the game a certain way for years and then suddenly be asked to change. I get it, the injuries need to be addressed but IMO, he clearly hit with the shoulder, maybe that shouldn't be the rule. I don't know how you keep players safe(r) and have the game be played with contact. It was a solid hit. Maybe those hits need to be removed too but whats the rule then....?
Completely agree. They replayed that hit a number of times, and it was clear that Browner had intended to lead with his shoulder into the chest area of the Chargers' tight end. Any helmet-to-helmet contact seemed to be really incidental, a slight glancing blow, and not intended--and so minimal as to not cause a head injury. Here's a discussion I found on that hit (ain't the Internet wonderful?):

http://espn.go.com/blog/nflnation/post/ ... owners-hit

And here's a video of it. It's hard to make out much in real time, but at about the 1 minute mark of the video, you'll see it in slow-mo:

South Pender
Legend
Posts: 2779
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 9:24 am
Location: Vancouver weekdays; Gulf Islands on weekends

NFL Week 15 Power Rankings (for what they're worth, which might not be much):

1. NFL.com (Elliot Harrison): http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap300000 ... n-top-five

2. SB Nation: http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2014/12/9/7 ... s-seahawks

3. ESPN: http://espn.go.com/nfl/powerrankings

4. Fox Sports: http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/power-rankings

5. Pro Football Talk (NBC Sports): http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/20 ... ankings-5/

In all five polls, the top four ranked teams are: the Patriots and Broncos from the AFC and the Packers and Seahawks from the NFC.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Thursday night game might be a good one: Cardinals at Rams. The Cardinals have a much better record, but Jeff Fisher has the Rams playing terrific defense, and this might spell trouble for a less-than-great Cardinal offense and their 2nd-string quarterback, Drew Stanton. With Shaun Hill back under center for the Rams, they've improved offensively. This will be a hard-fought, smash-mouth game, I think, with a lot at stake--first place in the NFC-West for the Cardinals and respectability at home for the Rams. Here's the preview. Rams favored by 4.5 (which seems odd, but I guess is a reflection of the experts' opinions of the Cardinals' offense).

http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/201412110 ... ab=preview
User avatar
notahomer
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6258
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2002 12:09 pm
Location: Vancouver

South Pender wrote: The Thursday night game might be a good one: Cardinals at Rams. .....
I'm looking forward to it. The Cards QB is doing his best but he came into the season as a backup.

The Rams have been making TONS of news due to their ON-FIELD but still off-field issues. :dizzy: Whaddya I mean by that? Well, couple games ago it was some Rams players holding their hands up in an obvious reference to police incidents all over the US, especially in nearby Ferguson. Of course various Police Reps were CHOKED about this (no pun intended, certainly not since another one of these incidents involved a fatal chokehold). Apologies that were not apologies coming from the Rams etc....
Then last week Fisher probably sends out all the players the Rams got as a result of the RG3 trade. Snub or playful jab. If I was RG3, I'd start listening to some of those people trying to help. You've got skills that can get the job done at this level put you gotta put the work in.

As a Seahawks fan, I hope the Rams win it but I'd probably be cheering Rams anyways since I like Fisher coached teams......
User avatar
notahomer
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6258
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2002 12:09 pm
Location: Vancouver

Oops, forgot to post about Cam Newtons car accident. Apparently he was in a car accident that resuolted in two transverse bones in his lower back being broken. Amazing the talk quickly turns to "so is he gonna play" but thankfully that chatter got shut down quick. The man is recovering WITH BROKEN BONES IN HIS BACK....FOOTBALL DOES NOT MATTER!
South Pender
Legend
Posts: 2779
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 9:24 am
Location: Vancouver weekdays; Gulf Islands on weekends

And here's a somewhat funny story--really a cautionary tale about how we have to watch the words we use:

I'm sure Lewis meant no harm or insult, and it sounds as if it was a tongue-in-cheek remark about Johnny Football (who is listed at 6 ft.) Apparently, the correct term is now "little people."

Marvin Lewis apologizes for use of word “midget”
Posted by Michael David Smith on December 9, 2014, 4:01 PM EST

Bengals coach Marvin Lewis has apologized again for calling Browns quarterback Johnny Manziel a “midget,” this time acknowledging that the word is inappropriate in any setting.

Lewis initially made the comment in a radio interview on Monday night and then apologized to Manziel and the Browns for what some saw as an unnecessary insult toward an opponent. But what Lewis didn’t seem to realize, either in his initial comment or in his apology, is that the term he used is considered offensive to people who have medical conditions causing dwarfism.

On Tuesday, Lewis issued another apology, specifically to little people who may have been offended by what he said.

“I’m aware that my comment on local radio last night was offensive to people of short stature and to their families and friends,” Lewis said. “It was thoughtless on my part to use the word I did, and not excusable, and I greatly regret it. I since have read about this issue on the Little People of America website. I understand it better, and as I have apologized to Johnny Manziel and the Cleveland Browns community, I offer the same to all others who I offended, and I pledge that I will learn from this. I hope that my mistake and the resultant publicity may serve at least to help others not make similar insensitive comments in the future.”

Lewis’s mistake was one of ignorance, not of malice. Many people don’t realize that the term offends people of short stature. It’s to Lewis’s credit that once his mistake was pointed out to him, he sought to make amends.
_______________________

And here's Lewis's actual comment:

In an interview with 1530 AM in Cincinnati, Lewis was asked if the Browns’ QB decision had any bearing on how the Bengals prepared for Cleveland.

“No, it doesn’t,” Lewis told the station, according to an audio clip shared by Nate Ulrich of the Akron Beacon Journal on Twitter. “It doesn’t at all.”

Added Lewis: “You’ll get a little bit more movement if Manziel’s the quarterback, the thing that they did against Buffalo. But other than that, no, that doesn’t impact you at all. You gotta go defend the offense. You don’t defend the player.”

Lewis paused, then added: “Particularly a midget.”
South Pender
Legend
Posts: 2779
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 9:24 am
Location: Vancouver weekdays; Gulf Islands on weekends

This just in for the Hubris File:

Geno Smith: I’ve shown flashes of being a Pro Bowl quarterback
Posted by Josh Alper on December 10, 2014, 9:01 AM EST

Jets quarterback Geno Smith is worrying about playing the Titans this weekend, not about the possibility that the Jets are going to take a quarterback early in the 2015 draft.

Smith may have been benched as the Jets have spiraled to 11 losses in their last 12 games this season behind an offense averaging the fewest net passing yards per game, but he says that hasn’t shaken his faith in his ability to be a long-term answer at quarterback. Smith says he has the “utmost” confidence in his ability and a high opinion of some of his work, although he admits that the good things don’t happen often enough.

“I’ve shown flashes of being a Pro Bowl-caliber quarterback, but what we’re looking for here is consistency. The best teams have consistent quarterback play and I realize that and that’s truly what I want to show to the fans and everyone outside the building,” Smith said, via Newsday.

Those flashes have been few and far between for Smith over his first two seasons. He’s been more consistent when it comes to making poor decisions and turning the ball over, issues which may be exacerbated by a weak supporting cast on offense but can’t be easily explained away if you’re making the case that better days are right around the corner.

With so much uncertainty about who will be making the decisions for the Jets this offseason, it is difficult to know what the future holds for Smith with the organization. It’s more clear that anyone in charge of the direction of the franchise has to pursue and consider all other options in hopes of finally solving the quarterback issues that have continually sunk the Jets over the years.
_________________________________________________________________

Truth is, Geno Smith has just stunk this season. I doubt anyone can recall many flashes of adequate play, let alone Pro Bowl play.
Post Reply